Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA, Recordings and Payment while appealing


WhyOhWhy13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, just wondering is these the new changes?

 

As I'm sure I'll get the dreaded form soon and after the last time, they lied through there teeth I want to be prepared for the changes.

 

So we cannot ask for a recording now?

Also if we lose it and don't get the 15 points, can we not get the basic rate while appealing?

How long is that for etc?

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
So far as I know, nothing has changed over recording ESA assessments or payment of assessment rate whilst appealing.

 

So nothing is changing? Have I been reading the wrong bits?

As worried about getting the assessment rate while appealing, but hopefully won't have to go through that as I want a recording, not going in there without one

 

Thanks

Edited by WhyOhWhy13
more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can ask for a recording. Also, you can legally make a covert recording for yourself as long as you don't post it up on YouTube or anything like that.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So nothing is changing? Have I been reading the wrong bits?

As worried about getting the assessment rate while appealing, but hopefully won't have to go through that as I want a recording, not going in there without one

 

Thanks

 

 

I thought I read on rightsnet recently that the appeal rate is to be stopped after October this year, and after that you have to apply for a reconsideration from the DWP (on no money of course) If they don't change their minds then you can appeal to the tribunal service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I read on rightsnet recently that the appeal rate is to be stopped after October this year, and after that you have to apply for a reconsideration from the DWP (on no money of course) If they don't change their minds then you can appeal to the tribunal service.

 

Oh so that is def happening in October? How can they do that? The appeal's take AGES

 

So were supposed to live on no money? Crazy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh so that is def happening in October? How can they do that? The appeal's take AGES

 

So were supposed to live on no money? Crazy

 

As things stand, the DWP does an internal reconsideration and, if that doesn't go in your favour, it sends the case off to the Tribunals Service. Obviously if the recon does go in your favour, there's no decision to appeal and no need for a Tribunal. You were not paid until the adverse recon was recorded and the case was sent for appeal.

 

The new change will mean that you can't request both an appeal and a recon at the same time. You will have to write for a recon first, and only when you are formally notified of the result can you then appeal to Tribunal. Once the Tribunal accepts your appeal, your payments will restart and continue until the appeal is heard, so the change is one of procedure, not policy.

 

Of course, there are a couple of problems. Last time I checked, it wasn't known whether payments would be made while the recon took place (I'll assume not, but don't know for sure). And also there was no specified target or limit for how long the DWP's internal recon should take. It's hard to escape the conclusion that the sole purpose of this change is to discourage ESA appeals and coerce sick people into claiming JSA instead.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As things stand, the DWP does an internal reconsideration and, if that doesn't go in your favour, it sends the case off to the Tribunals Service. Obviously if the recon does go in your favour, there's no decision to appeal and no need for a Tribunal. You were not paid until the adverse recon was recorded and the case was sent for appeal.

 

The new change will mean that you can't request both an appeal and a recon at the same time. You will have to write for a recon first, and only when you are formally notified of the result can you then appeal to Tribunal. Once the Tribunal accepts your appeal, your payments will restart and continue until the appeal is heard, so the change is one of procedure, not policy.

 

Of course, there are a couple of problems. Last time I checked, it wasn't known whether payments would be made while the recon took place (I'll assume not, but don't know for sure). And also there was no specified target or limit for how long the DWP's internal recon should take. It's hard to escape the conclusion that the sole purpose of this change is to discourage ESA appeals and coerce sick people into claiming JSA instead.

 

Oh of course it is, just to put us off appealing, and get us off any benefit or go to JSA. Disgusting really

 

Though I've been through the process twice and won appeals twice, 1st time at the recon stage, and 2nd time at tribunal

But next time I want a recording (didn't know about them before)

Had to do a full on complaint last time, because the whole report was a lie, said I did thing's when I didn't. Told me I may have something (ovary cyst), but in the complaint, he of course denied every saying such a thing :jaw:

 

Though obviously wasn't surprised, as all they know is to lie

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard to escape the conclusion that the sole purpose of this change is to discourage ESA appeals and coerce sick people into claiming JSA instead.

 

Just another example of the dirty tricks being used on the most vulnerable by this loathsome bloody government. I hope the whole lot of them burn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you won't get JSA; because you're unfit for work.

 

Well, yes. Or rather, you can go and apply for JSA and point out that you shouldn't be denied because ESA found you fit.

 

So then you get sanctioned because of availability/ASE doubts. It's genius, it really is.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^ quite so. All the more reason for anyone expecting an ESA50 to start planning before hand. Gather and file any and all medical supporting evidence. The more you send with your form the better chance you have of not needing a physical assessment. And remember, evidence isn't just Consultant and GP support. It can include your latest prescription and even a condensed digest of information relating to your illness and it's affects that you have compiled from online sources. Amidst mine, I even included a standard peak flow chart from the manufacturers and annotated it with my score. It's up to the DWP DM to sort the wheat from the chaff. You cannot compile and send too much info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...