Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Moorcroft chasing barclays/ old egg debt


inacorner
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3918 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been making payments to these guys for sometime now, possibly unecessarily, but its been keeping them off my back I get a letter asking for more every so often but just say I cant afford it. Anyway since joing CAG I've learned a lot and am wondering if its worth sending a CCA request but dont want to stir up a load of hassle and potentially court action

 

Reading some Egg threads it sounds like their agreement are now deemed ok following a test case, but I suppose there is a chance that Moorcroft wont have the agreement - any views on this liklihood or their track record in relation to them coming up wiht the goods.

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say you have nothing to lose by sending a CCA request, especially where EGG accounts are concerned, what test case are you referring to?

If the agreement was taken out pre Apr 2007, then get it in to Moorcr@p.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, you mean Alexandra Slater V Egg

 

It doesn't mean that all their agreements are enforceable, each should be viewed on their own merits, just that if your going to question the correct wording of 'approved credit' or approved limit, then their needs to be another avenue of non-enforceable argument.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers I'm waiting on putting a Citi/Cabot in dispute in the next couple of days then I'll hit Moorcroft with a CCA - cant be doing with all these things going on at once!!

 

Any thoughts if they'll likely come up with one?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I sent of a CCA request which they saiid they'd refer to Barclays the original lender and have now said its not available.

 

They say that the debt remains payable and want my proposals and that they will continue to report to debt collection agencies and that whilst the law says that whilst there is no formal agreement that this isnt to say there was no agreement and I am expected to pay. Are they just trying it on or can they take more action.

 

Should I reply and if so with what

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the CCA isnt avaliable, then the debt is not enforceable through the courts. They can still mark your credit file and send letters, but in reality, if you dont want to pay it, theres nothing they can do to make you pay.

 

Read what they actually wrote to you. They are trying to lay a guilt trip on you and basically say you have a moral obligation to pay.

 

Regarding your credit files, if its got this far, chances are its already on your file anyway. After 6 years from the date of entry, it gets removed, and you can confidently tell the DCA's to go play with traffic.

 

Im guessing the debt is pre April 2007 as after that date, they can come back with a reconstituted agreement which is much easier for them to produce.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say the same Daniella, but add "Thanks for saving me a sizeable amount of cash!"

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much!

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys good to hear...

 

They did say they were ...sorry to inform me... I bet they were

 

They also asked for immediate settlement or proposals to repay

 

I wiil respond acknowledging their cnfirmation

 

For the record this was a former egg account

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Dear moorcrap. Thanks for your recent letter. My budgie said it made good flooring for his cage."

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are, but you equally are allowed to ignore them - and that's what I would most certainly do.

And although they can chase, this does not entitle them to seek to enforce the purported debt in court .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they still allowed to continue to chase the debt

 

Unfortunately yes. The only thing a CCA allows them to do is pursue you through the court system. They can still pursue you through letters or marking your credit file. However, if there is already a default on your file from the debt, then its there to stay for 6 years anyway, so other markers wont matter much since they get removed 6 years from the date of the entry on your file. If they persist in harassing you, then you can make a full complaint to the OFT and FOS. This is why many debts with no CCA get sold on and passed around instead of being written off.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs,

Please beadvised that under OFT rules you can only visit me at my home if you make anappointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied licence under English Common Law for people to be ableto visit me on my property without express permission - the postman and peopleasking for directions, etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B.per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke licence under CommonLaw for you or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do sothen you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will betaken including, but not limited to, police attendance.

As you havebeen given this notice, should your representative then come to my property andcause any embarrassment which results in financial loss to me you will also beliable for damages.

Send this to them, and keep a copy by your door so if anyone ever does turn up you can hand it to them and shut the door in their face. They have no legal right whatsoever to speak to you, or enter your home.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...