Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
    • Not at all.  The onus is on them to ensure that their invoice respects the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to establish keeper liability.  Which it can't as the area is covered by bye-laws. Spot on. Irrelevant as to whether you entered into a contract with VCS to pay them £100 if you didn't obey what was written on their silly signs. Who cares?  What about their ridiculous generic Particulars of Claim where they deliberately mix up driver and keeper. And where do they mention this?  You haven't shown us anything. Of course you have to prepare a Witness Statement and you'd better get on with it. This is the problem here - you've disappeared for months & months, haven't kept us updated and presumably haven't read other VCS threads.  That needs to change - now. Otherwise you will lose - simple as that. For a start - please upload the court order which fixes the hearing date plus plus where "VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet".  We're not mind readers.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell death letter?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4097 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, a friend of mine has had numerous letters and txt messages from Lowell for a while regarding an old catalogue bill. Yesterday, she received a letter from them which was addressed to her estate and saying that they were sorry to hear of her death and that they had trained people who would speak to the family with sensitivity, and to call to discuss probate!

 

Has anybody else had anything like this, is this a tactic used by this company? It has definitely come from them but could somebody else have told them she's dead as a joke?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to CAG,

 

I seem to recall that there was a time when this occurred a few years back.

 

I cannot see how a third party has been able to notify Lowell of her ''demise'',

unless she has moved house and someone as opened mail sent to an old address.

 

Has your friend actually got an outstanding catalogue debt?

 

I can if needed draft a letter to Lowell for her.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou, I can't believe they do this! She has threw the letter in the bin as she thought somebody was playing tricks on her but she doesn't know how they would know she had dealings with Lowell. She thinks the catalogue debt is from years ago. I've told her to get the letter out of the bin

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a matter that will need reporting to the OFT onec we can get the actual

debt situation clarified, my current thought is that it's statute barred, so we need

to know when the last payment and or written acknowledgment was made.

 

Also she should check credit reference files to see if this debt shows there.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou so much, I'll see if she can find out. She was really spooked yesterday as she's having quite a bad time at the minute and she'd convinced herself that someone must have told them she was dead in order to threaten her in some way. She was racking her brains thinking who it might be. I still can't believe they would sink this low.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou so much, I'll see if she can find out. She was really spooked yesterday as she's having quite a bad time at the minute and she'd convinced herself that someone must have told them she was dead in order to threaten her in some way. She was racking her brains thinking who it might be. I still can't believe they would sink this low.

Get the information asked for the we'll go from there.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, the letter is from Phillips & Cohen Associates on behalf of their clients Lowell. The only debt my friend can think of is possibly a catalogue years ago but it is over 6 years. The amount they want to retrieve from her so called estate is £209.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, so 6 clear years with no payment or written acknowledgment of any debt.

 

So send the following to Messer Phillips & Cohen,

 

ref:as on their letter.

 

Sirs,

 

Re: The estate of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and Phillips & Cohens claim to be acting on behalf of Lowell regarding an alleged debt for £xxx.xx first of all no liabiity is acknowledged or accepted for any such alleged debt.

 

Secondly research has revealed that any such alleged debt is statute barres therefore no payment will be made now or in the future.

 

Thirdly until a registered medical practitioner certifies otherwise I am still alive and well.

 

As said this matter is statute barred and no payment will be made.

 

A complaint is being made immediately regarding the conduct of both Phillips & Cohen Associates and the Lowell Group in relation to this matter no doubt the OFT will be most interested in this underhand and distressing method of ''debt collection'' which amounts to emotional harassment with intent to coerce an individual to make contact.

 

I would suggest that Phillips & Cohen now closes the file on this matter and returns it to its client with the suggestion that they do the same.

 

send by RM recorded delivery.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I refer to a letter dated

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to say after many years dealing with DCAs nothing surprises me now.

 

Please keep us posted on developments.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted to play with them a little:

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxxx.

 

I understand that it is considered good practice amongst lawyers to wait until an individual has actually died before making a claim upon their estate, even where, as in this case, the debt in question is statute barred.

 

Take note that I will not dignify any further incompetent and unprofessional communication from you with a reply.

 

However, I have filed your claim in my records so that when I eventually die it can be considered by my executors, though it will of course remain statute barred.

 

I remain, still breathing,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...