Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I’m worried that if uni will expel me after knowing the shoplifting thing. I feel shameful about what I’ve done and I was kind of out of mind when I need money to survive. I will never do this again. 
    • There won't be any more amendments but please do upload The final version because other people who need similar help might find some of the contents useful
    • Thanks for the feedback. I have added the new paragraph 47 to my version of the WS / court bundle as per the feedback. I won't be uploading an updated version of the WS / court bundle here, given there is no other changes needed to the previous WS / court bundle uploaded yesterday (post #244). I will now get 2 copies of the updated final WS / court bundle printed and ready to post to the Court and to Evri. For reference, the date for filing the bundle is 24th May at the latest - this is 14 days before the hearing date of 7th June. I'll keep you all updated on if Evri reaches out to me before the trial date. 
    • Hi. I think you already know that stealing isn't the way to live in the UK. You could ask for advice from the student welfare people at your university who should be able to tell you about how to deal with this and refer you to legal advisors if you need them. HB
    • I did call the police both in the UK and in my country but both of them said no way to get the money back now. I tried my best not panic but it indeed influenced my life in many ways, the only thing I could do is start therapies. It happened around February- March, so I started to do this shoplifting thing to cover my rent and everything from the end of March, it’s been a month now… today it my first time to get caught. I know it’s very very bad, I seriously didn’t want to do this at all. But luckily I just saw an message from HR, they asked me to have an online interview next week. I’ll stop this behaviour and wish my messed up life back to normal soon 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Portfolio/JD Williams


debpayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Last year I received a letter from Lowell saying I owed a debt to JD Williams and

I sent a "prove it letter" which they acknowledged and then I didn't hear anything for a couple of months.

 

Now I have received a letter saying the debt was sold to them on 20/12/12

which I am sure is a while after their original letter to me,

I have unfortunately put the original letter away safely and now can;t find it!

 

Nevertheless this letter saying they bought the debt from JD Williams on 20/12/12

also says that before selling the debt, JD Williams checked their records and can find no reason why it should remain unpaid

and they have also included a letter on JD Williams headed paper informing me that JD Williams sold my account to Lowell and advises me of the balance.

 

Is this letter from JD Williams enough proof?

 

I have also received a few emails from Lowell stating

 

" We are not aware of any reason why your debt should remain unpaid.

It is therefore very important that you contact us as soon as possible so that we can agree repayment.

If you cannot afford to pay back the money in one go we are willing to let you pay this monthly by direct debit.

 

You could be entitled to re-pay as little as £1 per day should your circumstances warrant it.

If you cannot afford £1 per day then please let us know what you can afford.

Please call an account manager today so that we can bring this matter to a close or follow this link and securely set up a direct debit."

 

Please could anyone advise whether I should pay this or take it further

as I am 99% sure I cleared this debt several years ago and have even opened a new account with JD Williams since.

 

Unfortunately as it was such a long time ago I cannot find any of those details.

 

I had a similar experience with Lowell a few years ago when they said they were chasing me for T Mobile debt

which I knew wasn't owed so I persevered and eventually they backed down as they could not provide me with any details/proof.

 

Many thanks for any help that anyone can give me

 

Thanks

Deb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Yes the JD letter is proof (notice of assignment).

 

OK Deb, logical steps and information.

 

Check your credit reference files for this debt.

My guess is that this is statute barred or nearly so and is probably charges.

 

Statute Barred = 6 clear years with no payment or written acknowledgment of the debt.

 

Do you know when you last paid anyone for this debt?

 

If you are even reasonably sure it's more than 6 years ago I'll draft a letter for you to get rid of them. IT will NOT restart the 6 year clock and does not acknowledge the debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is a catalogue debt with a CCA, then send them a CCA request. The chances are that they won't be able to provide one. In the letter, advise them that you believe this account was settled with JD Williams as you are still a customer of theirs.

 

Lowells now appear to own this debt and therefore it is up to Lowells to check into this. Make sure you keep all correspondence from now on.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both.

 

I cannot remember how long ago it was and yes it is a catalogue debt.

 

I can not be sure that it is 6 years ago.

 

Ill try to get on experian later on to check my credit account.

 

The first letter from Lowell just turned up out of the blue, I hadn't heard anything from JD for years.

 

I have 2 catalogues with the JD Williams group running at the moment and I've had these a couple of years.

If JD only sold the debt to Lowell in December last year I really don;t think JD would have allowed me to have a catalogue account with them again.

 

Is it worth me sending a CCA anyway or should I just swallow it,

pay up and kick myself for not keeping any payment details etc?

 

Thanks again

 

Deb

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved ti the cat forum.

 

had loads of those letters

 

have you checked your CRA file to see if this shows

see below.

 

safe to say yo prob owe nowt!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no do not pay them

 

they are NO BAILIFFS

 

and have no such legal powers.

 

have you ever been hit with £12 fees?

 

most cat debts are full of them & PPI.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...