Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Newbie's here :0) - claiming for multiple accounts?


TC-Lover
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

 

Newbies here saying hi and asking stupid questions :rolleyes: !!

 

Hubby and I have four current a/c's between us with Barclays and have been charged LOADS in the past six years (at one point at least £90 per month for each a/c!!)

 

We are going to phone requesting copies of statements tomorrow (won't tell them why) and I understand we should also send off to the Data Protection people for the info through them, is that right?

 

So, do we need to work out what is owed for each account and send individual letters for each? Or can we lump the amount all together and do it all on one letter?

 

Also, does anyone know on average how long this process takes? From reading the post here I gather Barclays are very slow to refund?

 

Thanks for the help - but stand by for further dozy Q's!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to CAG!! No question is stupid once you have read the FAQ's and can't find your answer! ;)

 

Firstly, go by the rule of one S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) per person , so if you have a joint account lump it with one of your personal account requests i.e the other joint account holder does not need to send for the same details on the same account, follow this principle right through your claim i.e one of you claims for the joint a/c alongisde your personal account (you can lump claims together as long as they stay under the 5k threshold, otherwise split them!

 

There is no real need to ring and request statements to be perfectly honest, that is in effect what you will be sending your data protection S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) for, the only difference is you are asking for ALL CHARGES relating to your banking histroy with them and whether they see this as a request for statements that is entirely their translation of the request (some banks will ask for as much as £5.00 per sheet of statement if you request "statements" specifically, that is why there is a process in place here to save you all this unnecessaary work!

 

Barclays are indeed one of the slower banks to comply with your request for both charges history and seem to carry this right through to your reclaiming your charges, you will most probably find that you will issue a small claim to get any joy whatsoever, they may offer you a settlement of some silly amount somewhere before issuing court proceedings but there is letters available in the templates section to deal with these offers.

Stick to your timetables, read as much as you can in this forum, especially the longer threads which will give you an insight into what to expect in terms of their responce along the way and also will give you a confidence boost when you need it!!!

 

Any questions, please stick to this thread and someone will answer you!!

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays sent the copy bank statements I requested earlier in the week and on our two joint a/c's and my sole a/c they owe us £6740!! :eek:

 

Haven't had hubby's yet as he didn't get round to requesting statements as promptly as me :rolleyes: , so we have his to add to that too.

 

So - do we have to wait until we have sent a SAR before we can send the first letter to Barclays?

Link to post
Share on other sites

does the fact the claim is going to be over £5000 mean it can't be done through the small claims court?
Yes, it does. And it's not only more expensive but also a lot more complex to use the alternative tracks.

 

You would be well advised to seperate your claims so that each comes within the £5K limit for the small claims track. If one of your accounts has fees amounting to more than the limit, then you could claim the older £5000 of fees first, then go backl for the rest.

 

And, of course, if you do seperate your claims like that, you don't need to wait to get started.

Victimnomore

By day, quiet unassuming bank customer - but, by night, .. .. .. .. ..

Barclays Case1

14/03/07 **WON** FULL settlement £3358.39

Barclays Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £187.91 back.

Halifax Case1

14/03/07 **WON** Refunded £728 (including £54 costs)

Halifax Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £268.24 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, exactly.

Victimnomore

By day, quiet unassuming bank customer - but, by night, .. .. .. .. ..

Barclays Case1

14/03/07 **WON** FULL settlement £3358.39

Barclays Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £187.91 back.

Halifax Case1

14/03/07 **WON** Refunded £728 (including £54 costs)

Halifax Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £268.24 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good luck TC. You'll probably get a standard "we are investigating your complaint" reply, and "we will get back to you some time in the next seven and a half years", but not to worry and don't let that put you off. As soon as the 14 days is up fire off that LBA and you'll be another step closer to getting back your money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sent hubby's Prelim last week (on 8th - his statements took longer than mine to arrive) and we have now both had the "we will get back to you some time in the next seven and a half years" letters.

 

My LBA is due to go off this Thursday......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just doing the LBA's so I can have them ready to post when due, but am a little confused by:

 

"I calculate that you have taken £XXXXX plus £XXX which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken. Total £XXXXX."

 

What does it mean by "overdraft interest"? How do I work that out?

 

In my Prelim I said:

 

"I calculate that you have taken £815 from a/c #50545171 plus £3025 from a/c #60228974. Total £3840."

Do I not just put that again?

Sorry to be dozy, maths is not my strong point!! :roll:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just put in the figures from your prelim again. Most people don't put in the overdraft interest figure as it is complex to work out. This interest is what you have been charged in your overdraft for the penalty charges (not the basic overdraft). In most cases it doesn't come to a large amount.

 

When you get to file your court claim you get to add 8% interest which is well worthwhile.

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've just filed my claim with MCOL for my half of the charges (we have 2 x joint & 2 x sole and they owe us over £7000 so hubby and I are doing a claim each to keep it under £5000).

 

I was wondering how long after filing my claim do you usually get your court date? (not how long until date but how long is the wait to get the date IYKWIM :rolleyes: )

 

Also, how do they let me know, do the court write to me directly? Is the claim automatically filed with your local court?

 

Questions, questions....

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, hubby got a letter this morning (approx. 7 days after we sent the LBA) offering him £1000 (he's claiming £3260). How do we go about accepting this as an "interim" payment (which I know they will then withdraw)?

 

Is it not a bit odd that hubby has had this letter, yet my LBA deadline was up yesterday and I've heard nothing? (I've now filed with MCOL).

 

Also, the letter with the offer of £1000 has a telephone number to call if we are not happy - is it worth ringing to discuss?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to the templates library - there is a rejection letter in there.

 

My advice is not to ring them. Get it all in writing.

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK, I filed my claim with MCOL on 29th November and Barclays "accepted" it on 30th November and they have 14 days from that date to reply - so far they haven't, what do I do if they don't reply?

 

Is the 14 days up on the 14th or the 15th December?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Today I got my AQ with the defence from Barclays attached which is long and involved and full of legalese.

 

Am fretting a bit as it all seems a bit scary now!!

 

Don't worry its all part of the process. See here you will be able to find a guie to completing the AQ any probs post back:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-our-forum/53241-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in section G add this:

 

"I am respectfully requesting my claim be heard via the small claims

track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and

not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the

defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed

or even reflect their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their

actual costs and I am surprised the defendant did not counterclaim

for these, as I would have paid them without argument. However,

the continuing problem is (in common with the hundreds of other

cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the

banks are refusing to reveal the details of their penalty-charging

regime, and that the charges they apply to accounts for exceeding

overdraft limits and so on are entirely disproportionate to the

actual costs the banks incur. As the banks have a fiduciary duty

towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly

and in utmost good faith. Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that

the court in this case, not withstanding allocations to the small

claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in

the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid

end to this litigation. I have attached the schedule of the charges

I am claiming for to this allocation questionnaire to show a

breakdown of the amounts for the courts perusal.

I believe the case will take no longer than 1 hour".

You will have to write small to fit it in though.

HTH

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Today I chased the court and was told that the court date for hubby's claim is 26th April :o!! My AQ has not yet been given a date but will be done shortly.

 

I telephoned the litigation department at Barclays and was told that they are contacting people in order of their court dates and therefore we won't be contacted until 2-3 weeks before our court date to see if "we can come to a solution".

 

I asked why they couldn't just discuss it now seeing as I was on the phone and was told they had to follow protocol, blah, blah....

 

For what it's worth I asked for notes to be put on both mine and hubby's file to say I had called.

 

So, nearly another two months to wait :x:eek::rolleyes:....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

When do we need to send the court bundles off and who to?

 

We've got a court date for 26th April for DH's claim but despite submitting my QA on the same day, and regularly chasing I still haven't got a date!! :rolleyes:

 

Interestingly, the letter from the Judge with the date said that "the matter should take no longer than 20 minutes as there is no real chance of success by the defendant" :grin:

 

I called Barclays with the date and they said they are dealing with them in order of the date of the hearing and will "be in touch" 2-3 weeks before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...