Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • So this is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
    • Yup, it isn't a criminal case, it's hard to prove, but take a detailed look at my thread to see how many holes there are in what they have sent me, there is a picture building.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit Fraud Help


Squirrel84
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi! Ive no idea if anyone can help me here, I had an Interview Under Caution last October about my boyfriend living with me. Their main issue seemed to be that he had signed a birth certificate for our daughter. It is clear on my bank statements (that I have to assume that they have) that all of the bills, shopping ect are paid by me, but I have had a letter today saying that they are suspending my payment:::

 

'In accordance with the Benefit Regulations becuase I require further information. Before I can reinstate your claim I require the following information by no later that 13th March 2013 otherwise your claim will be terminated from the 12th September 2011 and you will have to make a new application. This may result in a loss of benefit. I refer to the interview with Mrs _____ & Mrs ______ investigation officers on 12th October. I have considered all the information and deemed that you and Mr _____ as living together from at least 12th September 2011. In order for me to assess your benefit from 12 September 2011 I require the following:

 

I require one piece of documentation for Mr ____ to confirm his NI Number

 

A second proof of identity is also required for Mr ____ in addition to that provide for proof of their NI Number

 

Proof of Mr _____ income since 12 September 2011. As the evidence requested goes back to September 2011 I will accept a print out from his employer of all wages received.

 

Written confirmation of all bank accounts help by Mr _____ and the balances of these accounts. If your total capital is more than £5500 please supply evidence of these accounts. This maybe current and savings bank/ building society/ post office accounts, shares, stocks, bonds and any other investments. Your statements/ bank books must cover the last 8 weeks.

 

If the above information is not received your claim will be terminated from 12 September 2011 and you will be overpaid Housing Benefit of £6278 covering the period 12 September 2011 to 17 Feb 2013. If you wish me to consider reducing this overpayment by awarding underlying entitlement you must supply all the evidence as details above. If this is not provided by 13 March 2013 the overpayment will be as detailed above and recoverable from you.

 

How the heck am I supposed to get that info?? Also all of that info will show that his address was not the same as mine surely?? Aargh!!!

 

Thank you for your help in advance :( xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to appeal the decision in this letter. Basically what they are saying is they've decided that you've been living together and want to assess your boyfriend's income to see if you're still entitled to benefit during that time and calculate any overpayment and ongoing award.

 

You must write to the benefits section saying you appeal and provide proof he was living elsewhere and not financially contributing to the household.

 

When he signed the birth certificate, what address did he give?

 

Can you get help from CAB or Welfare Rights with the appeal? These types of appeals are difficult and specialist help is a good idea to help prepare your case.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

The birth certificate is the main problem as he left the room while we were going through it and no other address was given for him as the question was not asked.

However that was signed in July 2011 and the letter gives a date 2 months after this.

 

Are bank letters and bills ect showing a different address along with a forwarding address given to a different council enough or would I need more than this?

And can I request copies of all data held on me (under the councils data protection policy?)

My next step was to contact CAB on Monday morning to see what advice that they can give me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best thing is to show that he pays bills at a different address (rent/mortgage/council tax/water/credit etc), that things like vehicles and doctor are registered at the alternative address, plus any car insurance.

 

Does he sleep over at your address? Does he make any financial contribution, and if so is this financial contribution to the household or child maintenance? Does he pay for anything at your address - for instance sky tv? Does he have anything registered at your address, for instance credit agreements or a car? Does he keep anything at your address?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

The maintenance agreement that we have in place is a car that is in his name that I have use of. (My house is in the middle of nowhere and since my little girl started school this had been essential) It is in his name but registered here as it is kept here. He has his own car that I am not on the insurance for and do not drive (of course). No financial contribution to anything else, all of the bills come out of my bank account. He has been registered on the council tax at his Mums house since around November but was on no register before that (there is 2 other people at his Mums so there was no difference to the council tax hence why it didnt get done before). Im sure that I could get copies of bills ect to his Mums address and a copy of the address he is at with his doctors. There is a pair of trainers and a few t shirts here I think but nothing else, and none of his mail comes here. He stays maybe once a week if that which I told that at the IUC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it sounds like the two pieces of 'evidence' they have is a birth certificate not indicating he lives at an alternate address and a car in his name registered at your address.

 

I suggest with your appeal you provide:

 

Proof of his car registered at his address

bank statements/credit card statements for the entire period showing his address

Any bills in hills name at his address

A letter from the dr's surgery (if they'll do it, you may have to pay) confirming when he registered with them, at which address and is currently registered.

A letter from his Mum confirming how long he has lived there, that he still lives there and whether he pays board.

If he's employed, a letter from his employer confirming the home address they have for him

Anything else you can think of that would corroborate his address - for instance any contacts he's had during the questionned time period with authority and had to give his address (HMRC, police etc)

 

A covering letter, appealling the decision that you were living together from 12th September 2011 to present, explaining your current arrangements with your boyfriend and his current address - how long he's lived there etc, previous addresses for him if relevant. Seeing CAB is a good idea, they should be able to help with all of this.

 

Your benefit may be stopped if it hasn't been already and you may need to make a new application if this happens.

 

Can you remember if they had any other evidence at the IUC.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! Thank you so much for your help :) I will try and get all or the majority of that information to send along with my appeal letter. I think that the birth certificate was the main thing along with the car. Oh and that his vehicle had been seen here by a member of staff who drove past on her way to work, but unless I could confirm the dates with them of this then he may have taken the car I have use of or left that car here. (He has another car which they never asked about). (I was never shown this evidence in the IUC and that was how it was put to me).

 

He was sent a letter from the council asking him to attend an 'informal chat' about 3 weeks ago but he didn't attend so Im not sure if they have taken this as him being unwilling to confirm my version of events and therefore going ahead with sending this letter.

 

I have got a letter from the council that he was under prior to moving to his Mum's address stating that her address would be his new address so I will include this as well.

 

Am I able to request all of the evidence that they hold in order to have a better understanding of what I should provide them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...