Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

had a couple of hand deliered letters, or sould i say 'removal notice' pushed through my door from excel.

the last one states 'should you choose to ignore this notice, our bailiffs will still attend to remove your goods. while we would prefer you to be present when this task takes place it will, if necessary, be carried out in your absence. additional costs will be incurred at this time.'

I have phoned the council after the first letter and was told i had to deal with excel.

i have not let them into the house or even answered the door.

my concern is that we have two cars, both on finance, 1 worth 3000 and 1 worth 8000, however both have negative equity at the moment. can they take either of these?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

had a couple of hand deliered letters, or sould i say 'removal notice' pushed through my door from excel.

the last one states 'should you choose to ignore this notice, our bailiffs will still attend to remove your goods. while we would prefer you to be present when this task takes place it will, if necessary, be carried out in your absence. additional costs will be incurred at this time.'

I have phoned the council after the first letter and was told i had to deal with excel.

i have not let them into the house or even answered the door.

my concern is that we have two cars, both on finance, 1 worth 3000 and 1 worth 8000, however both have negative equity at the moment. can they take either of these?

 

thanks

What is the debt for? if they are on HP no they cannot take them usually, but they may say they will sell them and pay the finance comapny from the proceeds, in practice if they tried this it could backfire on them bigstyle, as themotors will likely not fetch enough to pay what the finance company is owed let alone their fees and part of the debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should start paying the council using their online payment system and confirm to the council in writing what you will be paying them directly. Send a copy to the bailiffs. If you pay the council, then the most the bailiffs can charge you for without levying on anything are the 2 visit fees, which is £24.50 first visit and then £18 second visit. They can make a third visit and you would then owe a further £18, but that is the max without a levy.

 

There is nothing to force you to deal with the bailiffs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of finance do you have for the vehicles?

 

The cheaper one is on billl of sale and the other is hire purchase.

 

Just to be 100% the bailiffs have no right to force entry?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should start paying the council using their online payment system and confirm to the council in writing what you will be paying them directly. Send a copy to the bailiffs. If you pay the council, then the most the bailiffs can charge you for without levying on anything are the 2 visit fees, which is £24.50 first visit and then £18 second visit. They can make a third visit and you would then owe a further £18, but that is the max without a levy.

 

There is nothing to force you to deal with the bailiffs.

I have no problem making an arrangement with the council and paying it off but they just say I must deal with excel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be 100% the bailiffs have no right to force entry?

Thanks

 

There is NO right of entry they can NOT force entry keep them out

have they left any paperwork do they have a levy

payments direct to council

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay the council, then the most the bailiffs can charge you for without levying on anything are the 2 visit fees, which is £24.50 first visit and then £18 second visit. They can make a third visit and you would then owe a further £18, but that is the max without a levy.

 

There is nothing to force you to deal with the bailiffs.

 

I thought that the maximum payable to bailiffs for visits where they haven't obtained a levy was £24.50 first visit fee and £18 second visit fee (total £42.50). What is this further £18 charge/fee for?

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is NO right of entry they can NOT force entry keep them out

have they left any paperwork do they have a levy

payments direct to council

the only paperwork is the removal notice saying contact us, on the bottom it says the warrant will now be passed to removal bailiffs who will attend and remove your goods ASAP without further notice.

they have not been in, and there is no levy notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only paperwork is the removal notice saying contact us, on the bottom it says the warrant will now be passed to removal bailiffs who will attend and remove your goods ASAP without further notice.

they have not been in, and there is no levy notice.

 

The bailiffs can call it whatever they want but it is a liability order nothing else no right of entry

That is the normal response from the council you DO NOT need to deal with the bailiffs at all

 

Payments can be made to the council they can not refuse if they do take there name and make a complaint

Payment can be made using automated telephone service and online using correct reference numbers

 

what they mean by removal of goods is anything outside cars ect the cars should be ok if they have finance but to be on the safe side tuck them away if you can

as leaving them on the drive way is a open invitation to the bailiffs

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I've got nowhere to park them so got 1 on drive and 1 on the road.

What would they do?, clamp them or just take their details?

 

They would take the details.

 

Just deal with the council to make payments for the CT, but be aware that you will have to pay the baliffs the fees for the 2 visits. The council will have to accept the payments you make directly to them, but do it online applying the correct reference number. Do put it in writing what arrangements you will be making to pay them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not so much what the bailiff can do...it is more the case what the bailiff WILL DO!!!

 

What he WILL DO is to levy upon each vehicle, charge a levy fee and very often an "attending to remove" fee.

 

You can then pay the council direct and the council SHOULD then ensure that from any payments made that they credit the bailiff company for THEIR FEES.

 

This is because, the statutory regulations provide that from all payments made, the bailiff fees are deducted FIRST.

 

It is simply unbelievable the way in which members of the public fail to write letters to the bailiff company or the council.

 

Firstly, how does the bailiff KNOW that both vehicles are on finance?????

 

 

 

The following is a really quick rough draft that can be changed or amended......

 

 

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Reference number:

 

I am writing in connection with the above account. Yesterday we received a hand delivered notice from your bailiff to advise that he requires immediate payment of £xxx. The bailiff did not levy upon goods and a Notice of Seizure was not left at my property. It is my understanding that the fees that can be charged for this visit are £24.50 for "attending to levy" (where no levy was made). Please confirm that no other charges have been applied.

 

I would like to inform your company that I will not allow a bailiff to have peaceful entry into my home. The reason for this is that I cannot at present pay the debt to the council and I am aware that if I allow a bailiff into my home this will incur me in additional fees that I cannot afford to repay.

 

Both my wife and I have a car but both cars are subject to finance with xxxxx and this can be confirmed by your company by way of a simple HPI check. The current position with both cars is that the amount outstanding to the finance company exceeds the value of the cars. If you require a copy of the finance agreements, please let me know.

 

The maximum that I can afford to pay at present is £xxx and payments can be made by the end of each month. If you are unable to accept this payment proposal, please return the account to xxxx council and I will make payments to them direct.

 

Please note that a copy of this letter is being send to xxx council.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Mr Jo Blogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...