Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell - Interesting Situation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4133 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well I think it's interesting. I've read a lot about Lowell here on these forums and elsewhere on the web as I have been contacted by them. I do share the popular opinion of these people as **** bags but I am also going to assume that they too read these forums so forgive me if I try to "fly under the radar" somewhat.

 

They wrote to me claiming that I owe a major credit card provider over £5000. They say the debt was sold to them in June 2011. They quote an credit card account number with the last 3 digits missing. I truly and honestly do not know of this debt.

 

I don't live in the UK any more, I moved to France in 2008. It's a long story that I'll spare you but I now own absolutely nothing. I live with my partner and children in a house that was left to her. I earn my keep doing odd jobs, painting and gardening for other ex-pats. No sympathy required, I live in a wondeful place and I have a loving partner and family. I'm very happy.

 

Now this crowd are writing to me about this debt. I was paniked and scared at first. I found a template letter and wrote to them, recorder delivery, saying that I had no knowledge of any such debt. It quoted OFT rules etc. and said I ask that no furter contact be made unless they could provide evidence of my liability. I then received what appears to be their second standard demand letter. This did not answer od refer to my letter to them in any way. I replied and re-staed that I had no knowledge of the debt and this time asked specifically for a copy of the credit agreement and a full breakdown of the account including any interest and charges applied.

 

They responded that they had asked the lender for a copy of the credit agreement and said that they would reply as soon as they could and do their best to send it within the 12 days. I got another letter 6 days later saying that the lender was trying to retrieve the agreement from their archive.

 

Now I've had a letter saying "your original creditor has provided us with the attached reconstituted copy of the credit agreement you entered into with them, which they confirm you would have signed prior to the granting of credit to you. Under section 77/78 of the consumer credit act of 1974 we are not obliged to send you an exact copy of your signed agreement." Is this true? If so this in itself is outrageous. How can they get away with sending a copy of any old credit agreement and not the specific one bearing a (my) signature?

 

Anyway, this is where I'm at. I'm not sure quite what to do next. Should I respond at all. I'm in France and I've truly got nothing, I don't believe I owe the money and Lowell can't send me a signed agreement but they say they have satisfied their obligations under the act. They have completely ignored my request for a full breakdown of transactions, interest and charges. What if my identity was stolen and a debt had been run up against my name fraudulently? How would I know?

 

What should I do please? Your opinions would be gratefully received and appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cross border claims are almost unheard of as the cost would be prohibitive, they may well continue to send a stream of begging letters, however if you don't own anything there is virtually nothing they can do other than make noises, which is Lowells speciality.

 

They always evade specific written questions, therefore there is no point in writing and of course telephone contact is an absolute NO NO . In your position I would be inclined to treat their demands as JUNK MAIL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tend to agree with croc

 

However it is true they do not need to send a copy of the actual agreement,thank HHJ. Waksman for that in his judgement on the Carey v hsbc case.

 

On the agreement they sent was the address correct and does it fit to when you lived there?

A friend of mine had an agreement sent that showed an address of a house she had sold two years prior to the stated date.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can send you a reconstituted version of the CCA, but it should be as close to the original as possible. If the original credit was taken out prior to April 2007, they would need to have the original CCA to enforce the debt.

 

If they know you are in France, then they should not issue a court claim in the UK, using your old UK address. But they can try for a European Enforcement Order in a court local to you. But if this action is disputed by you which you win, then Lowells are back to having to get a CCJ in the UK, which they can't as you are absent, before trying to enforce in a French court. The other alternative is to go for bankruptcy in your absence, which they can enforce in France, but if you have not assets, then this will cost Lowells a load of money, they would not get back.

 

In this situation, I would perhaps send them a final letter saying that as they have not provided the information requested, that you will not enter into any further communications with them. Then ignore them. If your last payment to the original creditor was in 2008, then the debt will become statute barred in 2014 and will also drop off your credit record.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But why ask for a copy of the agreement anyway? It is not your account! Stick to that fact, no other. Asking for the agreement implies you know something about the account – that will just encourage them more. Which it has.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement did carry a correct address. My thinking at the time of asking for a copy of the agreement AND a breakdown of all charges was to see if the alleged debt was run up by someone else and see if I could prove that.

 

I take the point. I will now send a final letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand completely why you did that, but technically you’d be asking for data you know not to be your own.

 

Lowell tend not to respond to ‘prove it’ or ‘cease and desist’ type letters. I have helped people with phantom debts send numerous such letters to them, and none has ever received a proper response – just a ‘we are looking into it’ fob off.

 

Yes, definitely worth a final letter – can you send by some sort of guaranteed delivery, or send via a friend in the UK who can get a delivery receipt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received any previous correspondence about this?

No, this only started 2 months ago.

And have you checked your credit file?

No, I haven't

can you send by some sort of guaranteed delivery

Yes, all of the letters I have sent have been by French recorded delivery (Recommande International)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...