Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No electricity meter - 8 years on we have contact from Scottish Power!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am looking for a bit of advice on electricity meters, or lack thereof!

 

We bought a small one bed flat in 2004 and we discovered that it didn't have an electricity meter we could find. This wasn't flagged up at the time of sale so it took us a few weeks before we made this discovery. At the time we thought this might be because some years earlier the communal hallway had been done out by the council. So we phoned the local council who said this was under the jurisdiction of the electricity companies. However on calling around a few of them each of them said we weren't their customer and we should contact the council if this was due to their refurbishing. So ultimately no body came out and no body followed this up.

 

As a side note, some years prior to our moving in our flat had been "built" as a once bigger flat was split into two. Therefore there was a bit of confusion over our address which took some time to be sorted out as well. When we talked to our neighbour she also said she had no meter and had made efforts previously but to no avail.

 

Anyway as time marched in we never did anything more about this issue, which on reflection was a bad move on our part.

 

We now rent this flat out to a tenant who recently informed us that a gentleman from Schneider Electric Energy, on behalf of Scottish Power, had been to look at the electricity supply in our building (there are 8 flats in total in our building) due to a power outage. I doing that he had asked to see our electricity meter and she of course informed him that there wasn't one. He then asked for the landlords, ourselves, to get in touch.

 

Whilst we are relieved that this issue might finally be sorted out, it has always been a huge source of guilt for us, we are also terrified as to what might happen.

 

Given that we purchased our flat in 2004 we have no actual evidence of our contacting the electricity companies in those initial few months.

 

Any advice as to how we should best go about rectifying this, including any legal titbits or advice, would be very gratefully received. We would be especially interested in hearing from those who have perhaps had similar things happen to them in the past, how you managed this situation and the outcome. We intend to get in touch with the gentlemen in the next few days but wanted to do a bit of research beforehand so we knew best how to handle it - forewarned is forearmed and all that!

 

Thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a Scottish Power Rep on the forums, I will send a message to him to look in on you.

 

Meanwhile I will alert site team for you as well to see if they have any advice.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing happened to us , we Brought a property that did have a key meter when we moved in and we asked our supplier to remove it which they did .

 

We totally forgot all about it after that , but 8 years after the meter was removed i received a Bill for just over 12k for the last 8 years Electric we used .

 

I rang that day to see what the hell was going on and again they demanded the 12k for the last 8 years , even sending me a final demand for the outstanding .

 

One last phone call and spoke to a Supervisor who told me the law states they can only charge me 24 months and not the full 8 years .

 

That still came to just under 2k and was given 2 years to pay back the money .

 

Sorted !

Link to post
Share on other sites

The back billing limit is 12 months, not 24 - http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/files/2010/01/Back-billing-2012.pdf

 

 

How do they calculate a figure for this if there's no meter?

Edited by AnnoyedByDCAs
add link now I have 10 posts to do it
Link to post
Share on other sites

If there are others involved, you had probably better start by getting them altogether to discuss it an to agree a course of action.

 

You will do better as a group rather than allowing yourselves to be picked on one by one.

 

The next thing is to try and find out which company it is which says that it is the supplier.

 

I think that there is no question but that you will have to pay electricity arrears as you have been using it.

 

Also, it is going to look very bad in court that you haven't sorted it out by now - 8 years since you moved into the property. You don't have much moral highground. You had better start getting some.

 

As this has gone on for 8 years, it may well be that 2 years of it is statute barred. I would keep this up your sleeve for the time-being. Don't play it yet - and frankly it might be an idea - if things get tough to offer to pay those two years as well as a sign of good faith.

 

Of course, you are helped somewhat as the electricity company has a duty also to keep on top of things and not to let this kind of thing happen. Have you any evidence in writing that you did try to deal with the electricity companies? It would be helpful if you did,

 

Your objective should be to get a meter installed and to agree a reasonable arrears and to pay it off in as reasonable installments as possible without taking too long.

If you can keep it out of court then it will effectively be an interest free loan. If it goes to court - then they will win and get interest as well.

 

Frankly, there must be a meter somewhere. Maybe in one of the flats - serving the whole building. I think that you need to get an electricity professional to hunt for it - but independent - not from one of the companies.

Find out which company thinks is your supplier.

 

You need to try and work out what your reasonable consumption has been. You may need to ask others in similar buildings.

 

At some point you will need to write to the electricity company. Explain what has happened, and start paying voluntarily a reasonable sum per month - starting off with a decent lump sum as a gesture.

Even if they won't accept it, you must try and find a way to pay so that it is clear that you are trying to rediuce the problem and that if there is any problem, it is caused by them and not you.

 

Get a meter installed for your own flat as soon as possible.

Maybe you can agree that the first metered year for you will be used as a model for calculating the previous years.

 

You need to sort it and you need to appear very committed to it because these people can react very nastily - and although they are partly responsible - I think that the main fault lies with you.

 

If you are able to pay £500 down and then monthly payments of £50 - I don't think that they could complain and I don't think that any court could fault you.

 

If you can get this underway, then if they case you problems, you will tend to have the upper hand and will be able to control events more easily

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing happened to us , we Brought a property that did have a key meter when we moved in and we asked our supplier to remove it which they did .

 

We totally forgot all about it after that , but 8 years after the meter was removed i received a Bill for just over 12k for the last 8 years Electric we used .

 

I rang that day to see what the hell was going on and again they demanded the 12k for the last 8 years , even sending me a final demand for the outstanding .

 

One last phone call and spoke to a Supervisor who told me the law states they can only charge me 24 months and not the full 8 years .

 

That still came to just under 2k and was given 2 years to pay back the money .

 

Sorted !

 

The back billing limit is 12 months, not 24 - http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/files/2010/01/Back-billing-2012.pdf

 

 

How do they calculate a figure for this if there's no meter?

 

 

Looks like you have received responses from two people with actual experience - so ignore what I have said!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too am surprised there's no meter.

 

If you don't have a meter I cant see how you have a supplier, especially if you've never received letters. It's the supplier that you pay your bill to, so if you don't have a supplier I question who you own the money too.

 

Roughly how old is the property please?

 

At the fuse board in the property can you see 2 thick round cables (meter tails)? They are likely to be the only round cables and quite thick - can you see where they go?

Please don't remove any covers or make anything potentially unsafe in the process of looking :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...