Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry but that letter needs to be much much better. you need to express that it was a stilly youthful mistake trying to be the big man and jumping the turnstile to look big infront of your peers. TfL prosecutors are on the email address on their first letter. get the court form sent back to the court , (but copy it first) stating you plead guilty and wish to attend to address the judge in person face to face to show your genuine remorse for your stupid youthful exuberance.      
    • I thought I should send the begging letter to the prosecutor. Does the hearing means the time I need to send back by? If so, it’s June 5  I plan to send the new begging letter as following, can I ask for some suggestions? Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,  Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.  I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.  I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.  Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.  I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.  I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.   Yours sincerely,
    • LoL Dx you crack me up. Thanks for the advice. I'll stay positive.
    • Utter Rubbish!! lowell dont write and beg for deals once they start court. as for your attitude, we'll thats nothing new for you.😎 you wont be quizzed, it's not like TV, simply refer to your defence/WS when answering anything the judge may ever ask. well it involves chickens. dx  
    • Thanks fk, I hope I don't have to face the court. Bless you for the reassurance. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help please Small Claims Summons (Marlin Europe) vs Me £2252 overdraft. ***Marlin close file and Court Case Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recieved a court summons to Inverness Sheriff Court in Scotland.

 

The pursuer is Marlin Europe. Return Date is 13/3/2013 hearing 27/3/2013

 

Statement of Claim states " On or about 13th July 1990 Clydesdale Bank plc suppied the Defender with an overdraft facility in respect of account number 12981775. The amount overdrawn was repayable on demand.

 

I have several letters over the years relating to a debt of £2252 to Clydesdale Bank and then to Marlin.

 

I have to the best of my knowledge never aknowledged the debt or payed anything towards it since the joint account this debt was on was withdrawn by the Clydesdale Bank on 23/5/2007 as a result of my wife's sequestration (the other party on the joint account).

 

Interestingly and key I think is the fact that I did not marry my wife until 1999 was not on this account as a joint signatory until around then. So I definately did not take out a overdraft with the Clydsdale in 1990. I banked with TSB until I married.

 

I think I have a defence here a) that I did not take overdraft being pursued in 1990. I didnt bank with Clydesdale at this time.

 

b) The CAB suggested that as I have not acknowledged or payed anything to this debt since 23/5/2007 this debt under Scottish law is Time Barred. But that's not quite 6 years.. ??

 

What are my chances of winning? . How best do I present this evidence to court, what evidence do I need to gather and how do I defend myself ?. If I lose how much more than £2250 is this going to cost me.?

 

Any advice gratefully received.

 

Thankyou.

Edited by jadis
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

b) The CAB suggested that as I have not acknowledged or payed anything to this debt since 23/5/2007 this debt under Scottish law is Time Barred. But that's not quite 6 years.. ??

 

 

Hello and Welcome jadis,

 

Under Scottish law, if a lender allows time to pass without receiving any payment for a period of 5 years any action for recovery may become barred under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973.

After a debt has become statute barred, generally no further attempts to make recovery can legally take place. The debt no longer exists as a legal right and is deemed to have been abandoned or satisfied.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome jadis,

 

Under Scottish law, if a lender allows time to pass without receiving any payment for a period of 5 years any action for recovery may become barred under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973.

After a debt has become statute barred, generally no further attempts to make recovery can legally take place. The debt no longer exists as a legal right and is deemed to have been abandoned or satisfied.

 

Thanks, I'm confused some places I'm reading say 6 years some say 5. Is it definately 5 in Scotland ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 6 years in England and Wales, 5 in Scotland, comes under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973.

 

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/52/section/6

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

This scenario pops it's head up periodically, Marlin Europe limited is based in West Sussex and the lilkeliehood is that the claim has been drafted by a member of staff with little or no knowledge of the position in Scotland. . In my view, I think you should get in now with the following letter by recorderd delivery as it may stop the hearing going ahead.

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

(Your Ref)

 

 

I refer to your correspondence dated xxxxxx, for ease of reference a copy is attached.

 

In response I would ask you to consider the following points:

 

1) This alleged debt has now prescribed under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 as the debt has subsisted for a continuous period of five years-

 

(a) Without any relevant claim having been made in relation to the obligation,

 

A relevant claim in a consumer credit contract would normally be the raising of a court action-

 

And

 

(b) Without subsistence of the obligation having being relevantly acknowledged,

Then as from the expiration of that period the obligation shall be extinguished

 

A relevant acknowledgement in a consumer credit contract would normally be an unequivocal written admission by the debtor that the debt still exists or by making payments to the debt

 

We would further advise you that in Scotland unlike England and Wales the debt is totally extinguished and ceases to exist.

 

Unless you have contrary and irrefutable proof to the above we would ask that you refrain from making any further claims. You will no doubt be aware that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued guidelines as to practices which it considers to be unfair. We feel that your continued pursuit of this debt when it no longer exists under the above legislation is a contravention of these guidelines and throws it to question your fitness to hold a consumer credit licence.

 

It will therefore be our intention, if your activity persists; to report the matter to the OFT Consumer Credit Enforcement Team

 

I look forward to your written response.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by Crocdoc
Link to post
Share on other sites

and remember to submit that you are defending the action

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Took above advice. Sent letters to Marlin and Scottish solicitor acting for them. Got a letter today from their solicitor saying they have been instucted by Marlin to close my file and they will be having the court action against me dismissed.

 

Thankyou all so much.

 

Graham

 

( I will be making a donation to the site on payday !).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you check with the courts. I wouldnt put it past them to keep the claim active so they get judgement by default.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took above advice. Sent letters to Marlin and Scottish solicitor acting for them. Got a letter today from their solicitor saying they have been instucted by Marlin to close my file and they will be having the court action against me dismissed.

 

Thankyou all so much.

 

Graham

 

( I will be making a donation to the site on payday !).

 

Game Set and Match :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb:

 

 

 

Took above advice. Sent letters to Marlin and Scottish solicitor acting for them. Got a letter today from their solicitor saying they have been instucted by Marlin to close my file and they will be having the court action against me dismissed.

 

Thankyou all so much.

 

Graham

 

( I will be making a donation to the site on payday !).

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...