Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

barclaycard debt sold to Lowell - chasing BC debt


Hacked_Off
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you for your email.

 

So that I may trace your complaint and forward to the relevant team, I would be grateful if you could provide the complaint reference number for the PPI claim.

 

Kind regards

 

Peter Ross | Customer Relations Manager

Barclaycard | Executives Office | Pillar 1A3

Massey Road | Stockton on Tees | TS17 6EX

United Kingdom | [email protected] | Mail van 42

Telephone +44 (0) 1452 825576

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 367
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Undoubtedly SB looms Lowell Panic!!!

 

When in 2007 was the last payment, you can make a rough estimate by going back 4-5 months prior to the default date.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Undoubtedly SB looms Lowell Panic!!!

 

When in 2007 was the last payment, you can make a rough estimate by going back 4-5 months prior to the default date.

 

I've no idea to be honest. I wad made redundant in 2007 and for a while used "in control debt solutions" which didn't work. I know for sure I have never paid a dca even though several have tried (wescot, 1st credit, fredericksons etc) id know for sure if Barclays would stump up the statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that given the history of this debt that it might be a good idea to send a statute barred letter, the one below I have used a lot it does NOT acknowledge the debt, but will send a DCA in to a panic finding proof that it's not SB and very often turns up ''unavailable'' documents that you need.

 

Send RD to the Data Controller

Lowell.

 

Ref: use the one on their letters.

 

 

Sir,

 

I have been researching my credit history and in particular a debt for £ xxx .xx which Lowell allege is owed by me, this debt is said to originate from an acount with xxxxxxx, please note I do NOT acknowledge any debt to Lowell or any company you may claim to represent.

 

From my research I have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred, therefore I will not now or in the future make any payment or offer off payment in regard to this debt.

 

If Lowell are minded to dispute this matter I remind you that the onus of proof that the debt is not statute barred lies entirely on Lowell it is not for me to prove any thing.

 

I have been made aware of the OFT Guidance 2003/2012 and thesections regarding statute barred debt.

 

For clarification and the avoidance of misunderstanding this letter is NOT any admission or acknowledgment of any liability to Lowell.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that given the history of this debt that it might be a good idea to send a statute barred letter, the one below I have used a lot it does NOT acknowledge the debt, but will send a DCA in to a panic finding proof that it's not SB and very often turns up ''unavailable'' documents that you need.

 

Send RD to the Data Controller

Lowell.

 

Ref: use the one on their letters.

 

 

Sir,

 

I have been researching my credit history and in particular a debt for £ xxx .xx which Lowell allege is owed by me, this debt is said to originate from an acount with xxxxxxx, please note I do NOT acknowledge any debt to Lowell or any company you may claim to represent.

 

From my research I have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred, therefore I will not now or in the future make any payment or offer off payment in regard to this debt.

 

If Lowell are minded to dispute this matter I remind you that the onus of proof that the debt is not statute barred lies entirely on Lowell it is not for me to prove any thing.

 

I have been made aware of the OFT Guidance 2003/2012 and thesections regarding statute barred debt.

 

For clarification and the avoidance of misunderstanding this letter is NOT any admission or acknowledgment of any liability to Lowell.

 

Would this suffice by email? My printer died :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes fine make sure it's saved and print off a copy when ever you can, request an acknowledgement of the e-mail.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

.... and do not sign it ..... print your name

 

Please Please be rid of this myth of not signing docs it's nonsense these days BUT as this letter is to be e-mailed it is irrelevant anyway!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought it was best not to sign anything going to a dca via the post.

A good few years ago there were allegations made that a DCA had ''lifted'' a signature and ''forged;; an agreement using it, not sure if it was ever proved, I can say in many years of dealing with DCAs and debt problems I have never seen any such happening, if you require information from a company DCA/Creditor a signature will be needed to verify the ID of the person making the enquiry (DPA).

 

It's like printing your name on a cheque and expecting it to be honoured.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the score with ppi? I got a refund of Barclays a while ago? Shouldn't that refund come off what Lowell's are claiming?

 

Looking through the old paper work the figures seem dodgy anyway and I suspect this is why Barclays won't hand over all the statements. In 2009 I've got a mountain of letter from several dcas all with differing amounts an bare in mind nonpayment was made. There's 230,390,370,430!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a threatogram in the post of lowlife:

 

"Despite the fact we have offered you numerous opportunities to resolve the debt it remains outstanding.

 

Unless we recieve payment in full or a part payment with proposed payment plan within the next five days we will have no alternative but to instruct our solicitors to look to begin legal action against you. This could result in us applying for the value of the debt to be secured on your property or applying to recover the money you owe by making deductions directly from your earnings along with court costs and interest. Alternately we may arrange for an agent to visit your address to negotiate settlement.

 

You can still avoid further qction being taken by contacting our collections department now."

 

Good look with that Lowell, I have no property owned by me and I'm an unemployed student!!

 

I think they may have turned up yesterday, someone was singing my doorbell for ages. People who know me know to txt me first or it gets ignored because I'm on the top floor!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Hacked Off,

 

Lowell do love their threats, the wording here is quite funny I think. ''No alternative but to instruct solicitors''. BUT

''we may alternatively send our man in a dirt mac to see you''.

What a load of BOWLOCKS.

 

Ignore or ''plead poverty'' and tell them their secret squirrel can get lost.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to have the same cycle. Send me nice letters offering "generous" discounts and "we want to help" then threats then they go quiet for a bit!! Quite amusing really. I'm low on toilet paper today so thanks for the letter Lowell :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to laugh at their missives, I wonder sometimes how they could possibly think that anyone ever takes them serious?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...