Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you honeybee if you would my head is mashed now. You guys our savers.  H
    • You can edit the answers to be in red or would you like me to do it? HB
    • Apologies dx100uk  I did not put the answers in red  Thank you all for your patience. H
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton  Name of the Claimant ? Overdales solicitors  How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  13 may 2024 What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account 4546384809766042. The defendant faild to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. The dbt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?   Not to my knowledge. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  Online but it was for a smaller amount they kept on increasing this with me asking Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  It was assigned to a debt collection agency  Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  Yes I also made offers to pay original creditor a smaller amount but was not replied to Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant and got a less paid job I also spent some time on furlough during covid and spent some 3 months on ssp off work. What was the date of your last payment?  May 2021 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes at the time I communicated with all my creditor's that I was running out of funds to pay the original agreements once my redundancy money ran out that was when my accounts defaulted. I then wrote to all my creditor's with pro rata offers of payments but debt collectors took over the accounts.
    • Just an update for all. I received about a letter every other week, increasing in threat levels. Then I hadn't had one for a about two weeks, then Saturday received a carbon copy of the very first letter they sent me in February. Made me laugh, rinse and repeat. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vinci Car Park - Roxburgh - Graham White


Hayley vc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4255 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well I was correct with the first line.

Possibly wrong with the second - apologies.

 

Hayley. Sadly you or you Father have fallen for the ongoing multi million pound Private Parking Contractor Sсam.

 

To explain -

If there was a legally binding Contract (which is questionable) and accepting you are in breach of it, all they can 'win' in Court is their actual loss (ie. the unpaid parking fees). Only Courts, Police and Local Authorities can impose penalties and what these con-artists are seeking areclearly penalties. Courts don't like 'civilians' assuming their powers and will not endorse a penalty imposed by private individuals/companies.

Alternatively, if there was no contract, under Trespass Law all they can seek is (again) their actual loss caused by you leaving your car there which is lost revenue that others might have paid but were prevented by your car occupying space.

Getting more technical - only the land owner can take action in most circumstances.

 

But the parking firms don't play fair and rely on peoples ignorance and fear.

 

Sadly you and your Father fell for it making unprincipled rich people richer.

 

Love your Father, don't distress him further by pointing out he did the wrong thing.

As a Father myself I would say to you, please learn from this and don't leave things to fester without first finding out - and don't be intimidated by people who make threats. Learn your Rights and stand up to bullies. It's your money - your choice.

Good luck.

TP

Link to post
Share on other sites

why is it that now im getting lots of replys

saying i shhould have done this or should have done that

 

..i was asking for help in the first place because i dont understand these things.

 

..and if you sad enough to think i work for those companies

 

you send me your contact telephone number by private message

and i will call you and tell you more about myself and the awful nightmare this has created for me and my family

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for you apology tony you sound like a nice man...i have to put this all behind me and concentrate on getting my degree..I have learnt a lot from this...law and rights and politics and stuff is not really my thing and have promised my dad that somehow i will get part time work to pay him back

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont know where my original post is. this thread was created by the forum person after i replied to an original thread about these companies...there was no advise thats why i got so upset

 

 

 

Hayley

 

You joined on 22nd September

 

Your first post was post #1 in this thread - made at 20:54

 

You then posted the same thing in different threads at 20:57 and again at 21:01.

 

At 21:07 that evening you posted again which is now post #2 in this thread.

 

The above posts which were dotted here and there were all pulled into this one thread as per my post above.

 

You asked for no other advice than what is published in this thread and ALL of your posts are now in this thread.

 

ALL of your subsequent posts have been in this thread.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please post up the judgement please

 

so WE CAN help others...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You asked for no other advice than what is published in this thread and ALL of your posts are now in this thread.

 

ALL of your subsequent posts have been in this thread.

 

But I do strongly think the thread was moved to the wrong place.

 

She would have been better served if this matter had remained in the Motoring section, where I first found it.

I, and probably many others, only use this Site's Forums that have particular interest or knowledge for us - ignoring all others. I have never looked at 'Debt - Legal Issues' before, despite running up 600+ posts in 4 years

As Jamberson said, this sort of matter is very, very frequent in the Mororing Forums.

 

But we are where we are. .

The girl has learned and will respect her Fathers love all the more, the more she learns

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please post up the judgement please

 

so WE CAN help others...

 

dx

 

I will do this for you because i dont want anyone else to go through the nightmare that i have had..

.please give me till tomorrow to get it to you or send me your email address in private message box and i will email you these awful people have to be stopped..

 

..is it too late to try and change things?

 

my dad borrowed some money and then paid graham white over the phone using his card.

 

.can we hold up the payment somehow and do this differently?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please post up the judgement please

 

so WE CAN help others...

 

dx

 

There is no Judgment. The Court appearance is in 4 (or 3) days time.

They caved in through ignorance or lack of sufficient knowledge or advice.Notwithstanding it would have happened anyway.

 

And I am sorry to say (and will probabably be moderated for this) ims21's post is pure Site Team arse covering.

Yes, the link was there but not the detail for others to get involved with - that was earlier transferred away.

 

(I'm holding out my hand for the smack!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do this for you because i dont want anyone else to go through the nightmare that i have had...please give me till tomorrow to get it to you or send me your email address in private message box and i will email you these awful people have to be stopped....is it too late to try and change things? my dad borrowed some money and then paid graham white over the phone using his card..can we hold up the payment somehow and do this differently?

 

This opens a whole new ball game - if it gets in the correct forum!

 

It is possible to effect a 'Chargeback' for Credit Card transactions.

But that would still leave the Court hearing to deal with and if already withdrawn, possibly raise further complications about cancellation of Court procedures by 'deception' (see why I contain myself to Motoring?).

 

I am sure this is nothing new to Graham White who cave in or fail to attend at almost every Court appearance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do this for you because i dont want anyone else to go through the nightmare that i have had..

.please give me till tomorrow to get it to you or send me your email address in private message box and i will email you these awful people have to be stopped..

 

..is it too late to try and change things?

 

my dad borrowed some money and then paid graham white over the phone using his card.

 

.can we hold up the payment somehow and do this differently?

 

you can stop the payment

 

use http://whatconsumer.co.uk/visa-debit-chargeback/

 

as for post stuff hayley

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

or

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

.

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates.

.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

 

 

tony...

 

 

legal was the correct move

a link is good enough

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And I am sorry to say (and will probabably be moderated for this) ims21's post is pure Site Team arse covering.

Yes, the link was there but not the detail for others to get involved with - that was earlier transferred away.

 

(I'm holding out my hand for the smack!)

 

 

Nope...no smack and no covering either. I'm not like that.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just phoned my dad and explained what im trying to do he gave me a rather stern lecture and told me not to bother...my dad is not an easy person to talk to on thesee things (we are involved in the arts my dad is a musician but has very bad arthritus so cannot work.. and as i said this legal stuff dont come easy to us) much as i would love to stop this i would need his help to cancel things...which i dont think he would be prepared to do unless it was very clearly shown how to do at such a late stage

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court papers issued, It stays in legal Tony :)

 

Having just picked up on this thread from the Private Land Parking Enforcement board I would respectfully suggest that the above post might have created something of a problem in the sense that a simple unqualified reference to this thread didn't attract my attention - and it would seem that applies to others.

 

One can understand the logic: MCOL claim issued that properly qualifies for the thread to stay in "legal" but in so doing, in some respects, the expertise on the private parking board was excluded. That being said at 4 days out the OP was up against it although I believe there was still time for them to make an application for an adjournment and then to prepare and submit a full defence. Our experience is that Graham White's have folded in the past in the face of coherent defences and it is something of a first because, courtesy of the FOI, we know that Vinci Park have never issued proceedings before.

 

The fact that it was the OP's father who made the payment on behalf of the OP may assist in the charge back process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just picked up on this thread from the Private Land Parking Enforcement board I would respectfully suggest that the above post might have created something of a problem in the sense that a simple unqualified reference to this thread didn't attract my attention - and it would seem that applies to others.

 

One can understand the logic: MCOL claim issued that properly qualifies for the thread to stay in "legal" but in so doing, in some respects, the expertise on the private parking board was excluded. That being said at 4 days out the OP was up against it although I believe there was still time for them to make an application for an adjournment and then to prepare and submit a full defence. Our experience is that Graham White's have folded in the past in the face of coherent defences and it is something of a first because, courtesy of the FOI, we know that Vinci Park have never issued proceedings before.

 

The fact that it was the OP's father who made the payment on behalf of the OP may assist in the charge back process.

 

Excellent point and well made snowy (and Tony in an earlier post)

 

Thankfully (for me) there was little chance of success as the OP had left it to late. I live and learn and will make sure that anything like this is left in Motoring.

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...