Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I thought the LibDems were going to table a motion of no confidence? I haven't heard anything about it for a couple of days.
    • Sorry for late reply dx been away and appreciate your replies. Yes he has paid the original borrowed amount off but obviously interest on top in which is owed and offer to write off. I know it is only a small amount owing but I didn't know whether to attempt to pursue with reclaim of previous paid amount plus interest. Or just to accept their offer and have removed from Credit File.
    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder   We may be looking forward to a vote of no confidence in the Guv by the newly majority labour party as early as next week has allegedly been overheard
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Oakwood stalling and eviction due 01/10/12 **WON**


Eitha22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OK, so we can't say you have reduced the arrears since the court case in 2008 as they have actually increased. Perhaps you'd better not include these statements with the N244. I know it's a bit of faffing about, but I'll take the reference out of the statement and repost it - this of course means that the copy letters and budget sheet will now be Appendix 1 (letters) and Appendix 2 (budget sheet) so unless you have some tippex to cover the numbers and re-write over it, you will have to reprint/copy I'm afraid.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I'm sorry Ell -enn I don't explain myself well enough- really sorry for the added nuisance. Do people normally attach these and will Oakwood use this as a challenge. It doesn't look good does it? Obviously I know there were genuine reasons each time, as do Oakwood, but in black and white it's still an increasing debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's no trouble :)

 

Most people don't have their mortgage statements (didn't keep them/can't find them etc) and in the majority of cases they are not affixed to the N244, so don't worry about that. The new statement is just fine - as I said before, judges don't take people's homes away when they have an income and can show they are able to make payments going forward - they usually like to give people a second chance. You had a reason for missing the payments and the judge will see that .

 

Amended statement affixed.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok ok *breathes again* I'm getting severely on my own nerves now. Thanks for the amended statement - I'm going to print it off and then staple it all tomorrow. I'm now going to collapse face down on my bed, thanks for getting me through today Ell -enn, couldn't have formulated my thoughts and actions without you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try and get some sleep, things always look better in the morning when you're rested. Take your time putting the pack together for court (don't forget to change the Appendix numbers). Try and concentrate on the thought of how relieved you will feel when you come out of the court, knowing your home is safe :)

 

Let us know what date your hearing is and we can go through the process.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I promise I will take my time and check and recheck! I Feel more calm tonight than I have in two weeks so I think I will be fast asleep by about 8.00pm, rock'n'roll eh? And yes.. I have allowed myself to think about it all being over and sorted..just a little bit :)

 

I will be back when the court date is on us - in the mean time..as ever..thanks. *gives you a hug*

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, let us know tomorrow how you got on at the bank with those letters to stop paymemt to PDL's

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell -enn - ALL DONE AND DUSTED (the submission of forms not my kitchen cupboards pffft!)

 

1. Court date for Wed next week.

 

2. Santander were fabulous - actually called PDL companies 'swines' and said they had had 6 similar CAP cancellations from customers this week alone ( how depressing is that?) They even asked if we had copies they could stamp as proof of receipt before we could ask ourselves :!:

 

3. Phoned Co-op. Sorted no problems whatsoever.

 

4. Telephoned Oakwood to update them...lol...their reaction was hilarious. Suddenly they said *if* they agree to our proposals our actual mortgage would be £50 less now and that we didn't have to worry about paying this months arrears payment as we 'will take your good will payment in lieu of that'. Asked my children's ages and then started to talk about the joys of teenagers. I got off the phone and actually laughed. She urged me to ring back on Friday to see if there was any updates on our case (took all the court details and specifically asked if we had included our budget sheet and if we'd had any legal advice)

 

:whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow - you've had a good day :) well done! Told you things would be much clearer today.....

 

Aha, Oakwood don't like the thought of having to go to court - they know you'll win - bet they cancel the eviction notice. If they do tell them to take the £40 you spent needlessly on the application off the arrears - see what they think of that!

 

Now you have a "parachute" account with the Co-op it gives you the option to move money into it if you need to - even if it's only £5 every now and again - you'll feel you are achieving something.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, any news from Oakwood ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell -enn :-)

 

They requested I call them back today for an update. I was met with Friday afternoon apathy. Admin staff from litigation dept told me 'all our lines are busy, can we call you back'. Paranoia set in about bad news etc *sigh*. However... the girl asked 'what is it concerning' and replied someone will call you back before 6.

 

You will be hugely surprised to hear I have received no phone call. Useless gonks.

 

Thanks for asking though - I appreciate it. Feels like you are holding my hand!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checking :) To be honest I expect it will be Tuesday before they ring you to say they have cancelled the eviction, these companies don't seem to be able to get their act together until they realise the hearing is almost upon them. Try not to worry over the weekend - it will be OK.

 

Trust you are managing to sleep better ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The night after speaking to you I slept like a log (I intend that as a compliment!). I accept I'm trapped in a cycle of crap sleep until I know this is sorted for definite. I have taken your advice and am trying to find lots of displacement activities and it helps (I've sorted *that* cupboard everyone us has, the one you have to hold your foot against to shut the door)

 

Re: Oakwood. I accept they are a business and have to protect their own interests, I accept this situation however unavoidable is our own fault and responsibility, but I struggle to accept what I see as downright malice and manipulation :suspicious:.

 

Anyhow - nowt I can do now the office is shut, hope you have an enjoyable weekend Ell-enn - I promise I will tackle the cupboards tomorrow :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

So this morning at 9.00am I spoke to Oakwood.

 

They said after all this time and stalling that they were going for the eviction. They said the account was in poor state, that they weren't convinced we were in a position to keep up repayments. Then said something about soing another income/expenditure form and wanting £200 pm off the arrears and they may reconsider.

 

I asked hypothetically if we were to agree to £200 w9ould the eviction be suspended and they said no. I don't understand any of this. they also said even if the judge suspended the eviction they would still be requiring £200.

 

If someone could go through what I need to do worse case scenario here I'd be very grateful. They have lead us on for nearly 4 weeks believing they were genuinely negotiating with us and that the eviction would be cancelled and now we have no time to get anything in place. Can judges give us more time given the circumstances of Oakwood stringing us along to make arrangements? it says on the court forms not having someone to live is not a reason that the judge will consider. Technically we have had nearly 4 weeks but oakwood kept telling us if you just send this in or that. They have had our budget sheet since 04/09 so I don't understand why they think we sudden;y can't afford it when they could have said that nearly a month ago. I am absolutely scared witless they are going to be aggressive at court. it won't be hard for them to make us look awful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, please try to stay calm. You have an income and can make payments towards the arrears. Judges won't take away people's homes if they can show they are able to pay. Oakwood are one of the despicable sub prime lenders and are running true to form. As to them being aggressive in court - they will send someone from a local law form who will no doubt get the paperwork the night before and just be told to oppose your application.

 

Do you know if your court has free duty legal advisors on Wednesday ? if you haven't already - ring them to find out.

 

...and stay calm..... it'll be OK.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn - we checked when we submitted the n244 if anyone was available from the duty legal team but guess what ? The only day they aren't there is Wed. The admin clerk asked if we wanted Thurs instead but we felt that if things went against us it would be one day less to sort something out :( Do you think not having someone else to speak for us will go against us or that the Oakwood rep will attempt to run rings around us? I have visions of them bringing up the transactions on the bank statements, all of which are genuine and in no way feckless (bloody hell I wish) but I wondering what I can take to challenge all this. I find it perplexing that they say we can't afford it and then demand more money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt very much if the Oakwood rep will run rings round you - he/she will most likely have very little paperwork (they never seem to be in possession of all the facts) . I think you need to be telling the judge that they sat on your offer of payment for weeks and then said you couldn't afford it, but if you offered more money each month they would consider it !!!! irresponsible or what!

 

Loads of people don't have anyone to speak for them and they do just fine :) judges are usually very good with people who are in your situation and will guide you through the process.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I so hope you are right - I've lost all faith in anyone listening to and considering the actual facts, even a judge. Believe it not , despite the nerve bag I am at the best of times never mind faced with this - I go icy calm when I'm really up against it. I think I'll be able to convey what the sequence of events/circumstances has been etc but fear of the unknown ie the mood/personality of the judge and the level of challenge from oakwood. I think I was quite suprised at their action this morning - it's thrown me somewhat as to what to expect.

 

What stuff do we need to take with us at the hearing Ell-enn? Do we need to take all our documentation banks statements etc? I know you keep telling me it will be ok but can you please tell me if the judge decides against us would we get any extra time to make arrangements ie to see if we could borrow from a relative (unlikely) it's just even if they could we would have just two days, it's simply undoable. The person we might have to ask doesn't even live in the UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would advise to take the lot, just in case, then you can immediately put in an appeal if it does not go your way.

 

Remember, judges these days are becoming wise to the greed of companies like Oakwood.

 

Good luck, it is 6 complete years next month from when I was evicted and both those companies are in administration and haven't received anything from me they allege I owe (all fees after a sale which they claim lost £5,000, £4,000 of that total is an Estate Agent management fee which has been contested and they cannot provide paperwork to back their claim... only a single page which has the amount on which is not on letterhead.).

 

Good luck and hopefully common sense will prevail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the information the judge needs is in your statement which went with the N244, and he will have read it before the hearing so will be in possession of all the facts. You should take your copy of the N244 (and supporting documents) and any other documents you feel might help (although unlikely you will be asked for them).

 

If you read your statement you will see that the reason for the arrears was out of your control - the judge will see that.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I just wanted to give you some comfort. I went through a hearing last Friday. What Ell-en says is true! It was a local rep that was not issued with the facts.

 

The stated that since they had initiated the proceedings a back payment had been made by the DWP to the sum of just under £1500 and yet they still wanted to go ahead.

 

They said that I had not contacted them at any point but I have a letter saying that no more agreements would be entered into without decree and all my letters.

 

I had them with me but the rep was tongue tied when I started citing cases etc,. and she immediately asked for a 4 week continuance.

 

I told the judge I had all the proof with me and had prepared a bundle for each of us. Nobody wanted to see it! In Scotland hearings are in public court, in front of lawyers etc., In England it is very different.

 

The hearing are in private and the judge gets your bundle before going into court so knows a bit about the case.

 

The judge agreed the continuance and told me to bring everything I receive from them from now until then - on the day - together with all the relevant documents.

 

Remember, you are in the right...they are in the wrong. If the judge doesnt see this then you can appeal.

 

The sheriff was non-committal in my case but I got a few cues that he may have been on my side and it gave me great pleasure to see the face of the other side's rep when I categorically refuted everything she was saying. These people are at a disadvantage...they don't know the case....you do! You will be great. You have the passion to keep your home.

 

I couldnt get over the number of cases that were undefended...and that's what they want! They don't want you to be there defending. 70% of the cases that called on Friday were sub-prime.

 

Its disgraceful. I am now looking at my charges, insurance fees etc., which have been added to my balance increasing my interest. They provided them as separate accounts in court to let the judge think they were behaving fairly....but I could prove they were not if asked!

 

Shocking behaviour. They are trying to get people's homes by lying. If you defend they don't get away with it. Go get them and show them you are not to be reckoned with. Good luck. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you gemspan - and so happy for you. Reading people's experiences on here, there seems to be no end of different tactics these companies will use. I know I'm probably a little bit over emotional at the mo :wink: but I genuinely believe you would have to be somewhat psychopathic to treat people like this when it's so needless. I'm just about to start getting things together - taking printouts of any other evidence such as emails etc ..lol I'm sure it's all pointless, but I'd sooner go in expecting a fight and be surprised than under-prepared.

 

Hi all, can I just check some things before tomorrow if anyone is around?

 

I'll be taking -

 

My copies of the n244 and attached appendices.

Copies of emails sent to Oakwood from July onwards with attachments of wage slips, council tax letters etc which they totally ignored.

Copy of online bank transactions showing payment at beginning of sept.

Sequence of events on dealing with Oakwood this month to support why we didn't apply for a suspension sooner.

 

Some last minute Q's...

 

  • is there any chance the Oakwood rep will try and approach us before the hearing? They said they were going to pursue £200 would we have to prove we can't pay this above what is written on the budget sheet?
  • Does it matter that some details on the budget sheet submitted to them are different to the one submitted to the court (not vastly, just tweaked) would the judge question us over this?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...