Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
    • I think they're inventing stuff now. They seem to know they won't be around to implement any of it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty laptop and PC Worlds response


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4215 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I was wondering if this is the forum to ask for advise regarding a laptop I purchased from PC world just over 5 months ago on March 14th of this year, the laptop has sincedeveloped a fault in which the hinges attaching the screen to the keyboard have become loose through no fault of my own.

 

The laptop is a Lenovo g570 and a quick search of google with the relevant search query throws up a lot of pages regarding this fault which is well known.

I took the laptop back to PC world and was immediately met with the response that this was obviously accidental damage and therefore my fault!, to which I replied it was indeed not my fault, the sales assistant insisted that this could not have happened on its own implying that I was indeed lying!, and actually questioned me on "how could this have happened on its own"

 

I replied could she prove it was my fault which kind of stopped that train of thought in her and made her call the manager down.

Fair enough I thought perhaps this would be dealt with more professionally now, the manager stated that as this was outside PC worlds 21 day warranty I was not able to get a replacement but that they would send it back to Lenovo who would then ascertain if the damage was accidental and therefore charge me, or if it was indeed a fault with the laptop and would be repaired under warranty, I stated I will not be paying anything at all to Lenovo and that my dealings were with PC world as they had taken my money, the manger replied that was up to me basically telling me I am now dealing with the manufacturer.

So the laptop is now in PC world and will be sent to Lenovo tomorrow morning, I received no timescale on a repair and I am very disgruntled with PC world to say the least, and will never be using their shop again.

 

I was really just needing some advise on what steps to take if Lenovo do try to charge me and I refuse. Any knowledge is much appreciated, thanks.

:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pro

 

Welcome to CAG

 

There's a similar thread here:- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?362754-Laptop-problem-hinges-broken&highlight=Lenovo

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers.

 

If you Google 'Lenovo g570 Hinges', it seems to be an inherent problem.

 

Have a read of 12 and 13 in my signature. Send off the sample letter (faulty), tell them it's been sent off to be looked at, send it Recorded. How did you pay for it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rebel, I had a look at the link, it does seem to be the same problem, and having had a look at the sale of goods act would I be correct in thinking that if the fault occurs before six months the burden of proof lies on the retailer to prove that I damaged the laptop accidently, and my consumer rights are therefore strengthened.

And to be honest I believe this fault having been inherent in these models of laptops for quite a while means they should have been recalled from retailers rather than punting them onto unsuspecting shoppers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's correct. How did you pay for it?

 

Thanks Rebel, I had a look at the link, it does seem to be the same problem, and having had a look at the sale of goods act would I be correct in thinking that if the fault occurs before six months the burden of proof lies on the retailer to prove that I damaged the laptop accidently, and my consumer rights are therefore strengthened.

And to be honest I believe this fault having been inherent in these models of laptops for quite a while means they should have been recalled from retailers rather than punting them onto unsuspecting shoppers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's been badly designed and there's an inherent fault and because of everyday use the problem has been exacerbated, so I can't see how they can say you damaged it.

 

I am presuming that PC World having the burden of proof have sent it back to Lenovo for proof of whose fault the damage lies with?
Link to post
Share on other sites

If Lenovo deem it to be accidental damage then PC world have their "proof" and I am liable to pay the repair charges which could run into a couple of hundred pounds apparantly!

 

I am thinking it is in Lenovos interests to claim it is my fault and hope they act fairly. If they state it is accidental I then have to get another opinion at my own time and cost from an engineer.

 

My whole first experience from PC world has been a bit of a joke to be honest, if calling paying customers liars and acting like you are nothing but a problem to them when things do go wrong is this companies way of dealing with its clients, then goodness knows how they survive in this economic climate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

has it already gone to lenovo?

 

if not then go to the store and ask nicely if they can book it for a "SA01" repair

 

it might be they have already booked it for this

 

however if they have then they are bulling a bit about "hundreds of pounds"

 

a SA01 goes to pcworlds own repair workshop - costs £50 which is refunded if its a manufacturer fault.

pcworld doesnt lean on the team that deals with these it does come down to engineer opinion, and i know theres alot of discusion about the hinge issues

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have already sent it into Lenovo, PC World staff were not very forthcoming with this information, on rerflection absolutely horrible experience with this retailer, really made to feel like I was the problem to them, snooty, couldn't care less attitude of the sales assistant.

Also sent an email to the knowhow email address for problems and received what looked like a stock reply, which totally shows they misread my actual email I sent to them, which shows how much they actually bothered.

 

"Thanks for getting in touch with us.

 

I'm sorry to hear about the problems experienced during your recent visit to our Kirkcaldy store. Let me assure you that this doesn't reflect our usual level of service. I have forwarded a copy of your email to the store manager and they will complete an internal investigation into this incident. They will then be able to implement any training needs that arise to ensure that this kind of incident doesn't occur again in the future.

 

You do need to arrange for the laptop to be returned to Lenovo. The reason for this is that they are the authorised repairers for these items during their warranty. I would suggest that when you send this off, you enclose a covering letter explaining the damage and the fact that this is a known fault. This should minimise the risk of Lenovo returning this to you unrepaired due to the problem with the hinges.

 

Once again, I apologise for the inconvenience caused but thank you for bringing this to my attention. Although it is always disappointing to hear from a dissatisfied customer, it is through feedback such as this that allows us to improve the services that we offer.

 

Kind regards,

 

Leigh

The KNOWHOW Team "

 

In my email I informed them that my laptop had already been sent to Lenovo by PC World, yet they seem to think in the reply I should be sending it myself?!?

Just waiting to hear fro Lenovo now :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they try and charge lots of money point out that it was them miss booking it that has caused the price increase

 

however i wouldnt worry im fairly confident that lenovo are treating these as a common issue and if you see the other thread its easy to get a third party repairer to look at it and write a report blaming the weak plastics

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Lenovo are treating this as a common issue and therefore an inherent fault, does it mean I am within my rights under the sale of goods act to ask for a refund as the goods are not fit for purpose?, I really don't want this laptop back as it seems the issue will only happen again and again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably not the SOGA allows the retailer the right to repair the goods unfortunatly

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Go here http://www.facebook.com/curryspcworld?fref=ts and vent your spleen to your hearts content :) Put off as many people as possible and spread the word, it will make you feel a little better.

 

Prob the worst place to go to in the world, morons run by morons. Stuff is overpriced and usually not the latest stuff. Used to work at Dixons and the attitude of many staff members was ridiculous.

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I had a similar problem with PC World a few years ago. They point blank refused to refund, repair or even discuss the faulty laptop they'd sold me. At the time I didn't know about SOGA, but I looked up the Directors of DSG (who own PC World) and wrote a strongly worded letter to about 8 of them.

 

Someone responded within 7 days and sent me a full refund in PC World vouchers. Obviously it means you're still dealing with PCW but at least you could choose a different laptop. Maybe give it a go. I highlighted that I had spent a lot of money with them over the years and would certainly not be doing in the future!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...