Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Had medical but now been sent a IBM270(more info)letter????


Riggsby
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just need ESA to use my DLA award! :D

 

 

Interesting rae,

you have been on a merry go round for ages i can remember! what level of DLA you got now. mines hrm lr-care indefinate for now anyway....your not still awaiting appeal are you..:-(

My advice is based on my opinion and my experience. It is not to be taken as legal advice as I am not legally qualified

If my advice has been helpful, please take a moment to click on the scales

on the bottom left hand side of my profile :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Libro, indeed I am still on the assessment rate (almost 4 years but who's counting?). My last (current) application was Nov 2011 and I've not seen an ESA50 yet. My next move is to write in to a DM and see what we can do, I've got all my supporting evidence including a full report from my GP. My DLA award was an indefinate HRM and MRC which will now go in with all my bumpf. As we all know, indefinate isn't as long as it used to be. But it has eased the financial pressure a bit. Hope you're doing ok and nice to see your posts ... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Libro, indeed I am still on the assessment rate (almost 4 years but who's counting?). My last (current) application was Nov 2011 and I've not seen an ESA50 yet. My next move is to write in to a DM and see what we can do, I've got all my supporting evidence including a full report from my GP. My DLA award was an indefinate HRM and MRC which will now go in with all my bumpf. As we all know, indefinate isn't as long as it used to be. But it has eased the financial pressure a bit. Hope you're doing ok and nice to see your posts ... :)

 

Rae,

4 years what a joke,

It fails to amaze me how these idiots get away with..as for this room charging i have had it with this life as being disabled aint enough and living on a small amount of money. what is next i beg to wonder.:mad2:

My advice is based on my opinion and my experience. It is not to be taken as legal advice as I am not legally qualified

If my advice has been helpful, please take a moment to click on the scales

on the bottom left hand side of my profile :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a point to mention related to ESA & DLA.

 

Well people just to verify they do use ESA for DLA see ny proof of my award......

 

img009 copy.jpg

 

 

You can see that as clear as day on my DLA form

:whoo:

 

does seem rare tho, is much more stories of people with negative results having evidence from other benefits been ignored or even worse been told they not admissable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so glad you mentioned that. Yes they will use any other evidence for a different benefit.

 

It is not unknown for the DWP to question a DLA award and eventually take it away from someone on the strength of a failed ESA assessment, even if the claimant manages to get it overturned at appeal.

 

My 3 year Support Group review will be coming up anythime now. I also get HRM & MRC. I am seriously considering giving up my ESA claim for that very reason. I don't want a DLA review.

 

I'm very surprised that they haven't re-visited your DLA award on the basis of the repeated failures to get ESA awarded. Mind you if you do send a copy of the DLA award notice to ESA, they will as likely contact the DLA people to put them in the picture of you being found nothing wrong with you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very surprised that they haven't re-visited your DLA award on the basis of the repeated failures to get ESA awarded. Mind you if you do send a copy of the DLA award notice to ESA, they will as likely contact the DLA people to put them in the picture of you being found nothing wrong with you!

 

This is not correct. DLA and ESA are awarded for totally different reasons. It's possible to receive DLA without asserting that one has limited capability for work, something that is not true for ESA.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not correct. DLA and ESA are awarded for totally different reasons. It's possible to receive DLA without asserting that one has limited capability for work, something that is not true for ESA.

 

Why then are DLA awards reviewed in the light of evidence that someone has failed their ESA claim?

 

It happens all of the time, and you only have to read the posts on this site to confirm that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why then are DLA awards reviewed in the light of evidence that someone has failed their ESA claim?

 

It happens all of the time, and you only have to read the posts on this site to confirm that.

 

That may be true, but the fact remains - DLA has nothing to do with whether or not you can work.

 

ESA does. They are awarded for different reasons.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That may be true, but the fact remains - DLA has nothing to do with whether or not you can work.

 

ESA does. They are awarded for different reasons.

 

I am aware ot that.

 

I only made the comment as a warning that because the poster has failed 3 ESA assessments yet receives DLA, it is probable based on what has been mentioned on this site previously that the DLA award my be revisited in the light of those 3 failures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have received an IBM270, asking the same. I responded to this and have received a response a week later, following the 17 days deadline, that my ESA assessment had scored 9 points. I needed at least 15 points to qualify for ESA. I am now going to appeal and ask them to continue paying me ESA or Incapacity Benefit until my appeal is decided. The decision letter has given me one month to appeal and also states that my current benefit (Incapacity) will terminate in 23 days time, so it looks like I will receive another two fortightly payments of Incapacity Benefit until it is stopped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just phoned ESA and they are sending me a form GL24to appeal and I need to send in a medical certificate with my appeal. Not sure what a medical certificate is. They have said that I would then go on the basic rate of ESA until my appeal is decided. Does this sound correct? I thought that I would remain on the rate I am currently receiving, until my appeal is heard, rather than being moved onto a lower rate which would be about £35 less per week than I receive at present.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...