Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thread title updated. so a sold debt. who are the solicitors? TM legal? why didn't ovo do this themselves as they do but chose to sell the debt on for 10p=£1? funny debt you state you reived a letter of claim, why did you not reply too it.? also is there is no indication of the date this bill comes from on the claimform? how do you know its from 2022? what other previous paperwork have you received? please scan page 1 of the claimform and bothsides of ALL previous letters upto one mass pdf read upload carefully. .................. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Thank you again. I'm hoping it will come out in the wash and will endeavour to check my online account. I'm a bit unsettled by not hearing from Booking.com but the host is sounding helpful at the moment. HB
    • I've just remembered that a friend of mine had bookings cancelled on Booking.com about a month ago - and the good news is that all worked out in the wash. I'm at work now but will scribble properly in a couple of hours with the full tale.
    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 22 May 2024  Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. 2. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. 3. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300 and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984. What is the total value of the claim? £385 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier What was the date of your last payment? Never  Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Combined Parking Solutions ticket


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4212 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am the Registered Keeper (RK) of a vehicle that has received a parking ticket from Combined Parking Solutions.

 

Although this is my first post I have been reading through various previous threads and, following the advice on the forum, have ignored the ticket.

 

I've now received my first letter so it's always worth clarifying the considered opinion here on the forum.

 

How likely is it that this company will issue court proceedings?

 

I understand that should this go to court it is up to the company to prove that the RK was the driver; it is not the responsibility of the RK to help them in any way.

 

Can they go to court simply on the basis that the "balance of probabilities", in the absence of any further evidence, the RK was the driver at the time?

 

The vehicle in question has more than one named driver on the insurance.

 

I own another vehicle registered at the same address.

 

This too has more than one named driver on the insurance.

 

There is a third vehicle in my household registered at the same address.

 

I am one of the named drivers on its insurance.

 

I drive all 3 vehicles on a regular basis, occasionally all in one day.

 

How do they identify the driver of the subject vehicle to the court's satisfaction?

 

Regards, PA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful what you post on here or other forums this company do monitor this forum and others.

 

If you were not the driver then they have no cause of action against you, if they did want to go down the track of trying to convince a court that in all probability you were the driver at the time, their case would be weakened by you using other vehicles and others being entitled to drive the vehicle in question.

 

This company have been known to try their hand at court and claim victories, whether they are genuine or not only they and the defendant knows. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful what you post on here or other forums this company do monitor this forum and others.

Yes, I quite understand. As I said, I am the Registered Keeper of the vehicle and they have written to me.

 

If you were not the driver then they have no cause of action against you, if they did want to go down the track of trying to convince a court that in all probability you were the driver at the time, their case would be weakened by you using other vehicles and others being entitled to drive the vehicle in question.

 

This company have been known to try their hand at court and claim victories, whether they are genuine or not only they and the defendant knows. :wink:

 

I'm interested to know from an impartial viewpoint what they would need to convince a court that a Registered Keeper must have been the driver in the absence of any other identifying evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I'm interested to know from an impartial viewpoint what they would need to convince a court that a Registered Keeper must have been the driver in the absence of any other identifying evidence.

 

The two I have heard about have been when they have evidence that the person was actually the driver, one were he said he wasn't and then posted on websites he was, the other when he said he wasn't the driver but had him on CCTV.

 

If they have no evidence I don't think any one could convince a court that the RK was the driver. However if you were the driver it would not be a good move to tell a judge you were not!

 

As stated just ignore them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who was driving is only a very small part of the debtate, that is whyl keeper laibility which has been introduced under the Protection of Freedoms Act (Excluding Scotland) will make no difference whatsoever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It's been another 2 months (so over 4 months since the allgeded infraction) and I haven't heard anything beyond the first letter - the one littered with threats of legal action yet having no signature block at the bottom, just an illegible scribble from an unnamed person. I'm almost feeling neglected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't this company been suspended from the DVLA database?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Perhaps I spoke too soon. I've now received a "Final Demand"; (in red ink, no less), bizarrely for £200. No explanation where this figure comes from either as this is only the second communication I have received from CPS and its debt recovery service. The letter is from Daniels Silverman. I'm sure they have form here on these forums with other members.

 

I wonder if CPS have time on their hands since being suspended from Keeper Records access by the DVLA to go through their backlog of people so far not intimidated to pay their specualtive invoices? They promise they "will take final recovery action through the courts" if I fail to pay.

 

I will be following the forum advice of "file and forget". I'm sure I can count on forum members' advice if they are foolish enough to issue a county court claim.

Edited by Parking Alf
Paragraphing
Link to post
Share on other sites

With reference to Combined Parking Solutions,

 

I found the following posted on the MSE site:

 

 

======================================

 

So let me get this right!

 

Combined solutions UK Ltd T/A Combined parking solutions.

Became Combined parking solutions Ltd on 18/06/12

When Mike (perky) Perkins registered as the director of Combined parking solutions

 

Then said Mike Perkins became a member of the BPA AOS board and was congratulated by Combined parking solutions on their website.

 

Shortly after Combined parking solutions were banned from accessing the DVLA for misconduct!

 

Then Mike Perkins resigned as a director of Combined parking solutions Then it is rumoured that he has also resigned from the AOS aboard, although the Combined parking solutions website is still carrying their congratulations.

 

OOPS sorry I see Combined parking solutions have now taken the congratulations down!

 

I wonder if that means he is no longer at Combined parking solutions as their strategies advisor?

 

==========================================================

 

It would seem that Combined Parking Solutions need to have a good look at how they behave!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Continue to ignore

 

Information

 

Daniels Silverman have sent out a lot of letters to Timeshare Owners but I suspect they haven't followed any through.

 

http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2011/04/diamond-resorts-sends-in-debt.html

 

Not motoring but it may give you a flavour of how they operate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
And now the "Notice of Intended Court Action" has arrived. And filed in my "Notice to Vigorously Defend" folder.

 

I intend to win the lottery expect neither of the two will happen:wink:

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...