Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help - before hearing!!


noli28
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a long story but to cut it short here goes:

 

A year and a half ago I parked my car on a road and went to get a ticket. I then put the ticket on my dashboard but as I did so (even though I had paid) I realised that the ticket issued was a free ticket. I therefore went back to the machine and got my paid for ticket, which I placed on the dashboard.

 

When I returned the parking warden had issued me with a fine - ignoring the paid for ticket and looking at the free ticket.:-x

 

Needless to say I disputed this by letter and heard no more. Until I was woken up by a noise outside my house at 5.30am and by a van driving away!! Equita had placed a clamp on my own vehicle with no warning whatsoever, on my own driveway.

 

I phoned the baliff to tell him that I had a valid ticket and that I had disputed this fine but he told me my car was due to be towed at 8.30 and therefore I wouldnt even be able to phone the council to prove (I still had the fine documents and ticket) that I had indeed paid.

 

I was told to pay 415 pounds or my car would be gone. As I was very ill at the time I had to beg my parents to loan me the money as I couldnt afford it and needed my car to go to hospital appointments. I was told I could claim this money back off the council.

 

I paid and then proceeded to send letter after letter, only to be ignored. I therefore felt I had no option to issue court proceedings, of which i did. I was awarded a ccj by default which was eventually set aside on a technicality of an address and I had to start again. I wasted half a day going to the original and then the set aside hearing. I am currently awaiting a new hearning date.

 

I feel very upset and paranoid about any noise outside my house and this has left me very shaken. I have kept all my documentation and in the councils pictoral evidence it supports my evidence.

 

However, out of the blue I got a letter and cheque for 415 saying that they would not pay costs or interest and they are now in belief (without prejudice) that if I had taken this to appeal in the first place that I would have won. Even though I had already done this!!!!

 

Their apparent maladministration has caused me time, costs and a lot of heart ache and I really feel angry that all this time has passed and they think it is ok now to offer me this baliff fee back with no apology or offer to pay the interest or my costs.

 

I have acted as a litigant in person throughout and have made sure that I have done anything before going to court. My question is what should I do next???? - I would be really out of pocket if I accept this money - should I send this cheque back and say that this is not acceptable? Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a long story but to cut it short here goes:

 

A year and a half ago I parked my car on a road and went to get a ticket. I then put the ticket on my dashboard but as I did so (even though I had paid) I realised that the ticket issued was a free ticket. I therefore went back to the machine and got my paid for ticket, which I placed on the dashboard.

 

When I returned the parking warden had issued me with a fine - ignoring the paid for ticket and looking at the free ticket.:-x

 

Needless to say I disputed this by letter and heard no more. Until I was woken up by a noise outside my house at 5.30am and by a van driving away!! Equita had placed a clamp on my own vehicle with no warning whatsoever, on my own driveway.

 

I phoned the baliff to tell him that I had a valid ticket and that I had disputed this fine but he told me my car was due to be towed at 8.30 and therefore I wouldnt even be able to phone the council to prove (I still had the fine documents and ticket) that I had indeed paid.

 

I was told to pay 415 pounds or my car would be gone. As I was very ill at the time I had to beg my parents to loan me the money as I couldnt afford it and needed my car to go to hospital appointments. I was told I could claim this money back off the council.

 

I paid and then proceeded to send letter after letter, only to be ignored. I therefore felt I had no option to issue court proceedings, of which i did. I was awarded a ccj by default which was eventually set aside on a technicality of an address and I had to start again. I wasted half a day going to the original and then the set aside hearing. I am currently awaiting a new hearning date.

 

I feel very upset and paranoid about any noise outside my house and this has left me very shaken. I have kept all my documentation and in the councils pictoral evidence it supports my evidence.

 

However, out of the blue I got a letter and cheque for 415 saying that they would not pay costs or interest and they are now in belief (without prejudice) that if I had taken this to appeal in the first place that I would have won. Even though I had already done this!!!!

 

Their apparent maladministration has caused me time, costs and a lot of heart ache and I really feel angry that all this time has passed and they think it is ok now to offer me this baliff fee back with no apology or offer to pay the interest or my costs.

 

I have acted as a litigant in person throughout and have made sure that I have done anything before going to court. My question is what should I do next???? - I would be really out of pocket if I accept this money - should I send this cheque back and say that this is not acceptable? Any advice would be appreciated.

 

Good evening noli28

 

What damages are you claiming for?

 

You could accept the £415 as partial payment towards the damages suffered. What does their without prejudice letter offer state, precisely. Can you post up these details minus the personal info contained therein.

 

With regards to your anxiety suffered if you should happen to hear a noise outside your home, you may be able to claim damages under the tort - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) - mental shock.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Following the set aside hearing on xxxx where the District Judge set aside the default judgement and ordered that the draft defence lodged at the court should stand as the councils defence. The judge also indicated informally, that he would hope that the Council would consider the claim further once the documentation was reviewed that was lodged at the court by myself.

 

The documentation has been reviewed and I can confirm that if this information had been received sooner the appeal would have been accepted.(6 letters were sent and proof and copies kept) I have no doubt of the purchasing of the pay and dsplay ticket but it was not displayed on the vehicle. (the councils own evidence and photos show 2 tickets clearly displayed)

 

On this basis I am prepared to offer the sum of 415 pounds without prejudice as a full and final settlement. However, am unwilling to contribute to the costs, damages or interest as these occured as a failure to appeal. (5 letters sent and ignored!!! - all sent within the timescale given and the correct procedure followed)

 

I enclose a cheque for 415 pounds and would appreciate confirmation that this is to your satisfaction.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes, I sent all documentation to the right address and have the proof I did so. The reason that the inital set aside happened was because I issued it to the address documented on the ticket rather than to the councils main address. The council did not acknowledge my appeal but as I sent documentation by registered post I have proof they got it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Following the set aside hearing on xxxx where the District Judge set aside the default judgement and ordered that the draft defence lodged at the court should stand as the councils defence. The judge also indicated informally, that he would hope that the Council would consider the claim further once the documentation was reviewed that was lodged at the court by myself.

 

The documentation has been reviewed and I can confirm that if this information had been received sooner the appeal would have been accepted.(6 letters were sent and proof and copies kept) I have no doubt of the purchasing of the pay and dsplay ticket but it was not displayed on the vehicle. (the councils own evidence and photos show 2 tickets clearly displayed)

 

On this basis I am prepared to offer the sum of 415 pounds without prejudice as a full and final settlement. However, am unwilling to contribute to the costs, damages or interest as these occured as a failure to appeal. (5 letters sent and ignored!!! - all sent within the timescale given and the correct procedure followed)

 

I enclose a cheque for 415 pounds and would appreciate confirmation that this is to your satisfaction.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

xxxx

 

Thank you for posting their WP offer up.

 

Based upon your postings here, the damages, suffered and costs incurred and distress caused is clearly because of their negligence and wrongful clamping of your vehicle. You are the innocent party in this dispute and have evidence in your possession to prove this irrefutable fact.

 

Only you can decide whether to accept their offer in full and final of this matter, how much are you claiming in damages + costs + distress?

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't want to accept this offer as I feel very angry that they have done this!! I have charged litigant in person costs ( as shown on this website) and costs for submitting this claim which amount to around 300 pounds. However, I have been told informally by the court to write back to them detailing my claims for damages and distress. I am a bit stuck here! What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't want to accept this offer as I feel very angry that they have done this!! I have charged litigant in person costs ( as shown on this website) and costs for submitting this claim which amount to around 300 pounds. However, I have been told informally by the court to write back to them detailing my claims for damages and distress. I am a bit stuck here! What should I do?

 

If you write to the council, then simply state that they had no grounds to take the action against you, they behaved like men 'turning a blind eye' to your numerous letters informing them as to the facts and reality of your dispute with them, by illegally clamping your vehicle (which was parked on private property) you suffered extreme distress and anxiety as you are unwell and needed your car to attend hospital appointments, their illegal action affected your parents as you had to ask your parents to raise the monies required in order to remove the illegally placed clamp on your car, further, their illegal action against you violated your rights to peace and enjoyment and privacy in your household under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act and as a further consequence of their illegal action taken against you, you still suffer emotional distress when you hear any noises outside your home which brings on anxiety attack (panic attack).

 

In these circumstances, you are entitled to your costs incurred for having to issue proceedings against them and you are entitled to damages for the extreme distress caused by their unequivocally illegal action taken against you.

 

As to damages for the distress and anxiety, this is difficult to quantify the level of compensation, you could ask the council to put forward any offer in this respect and if you consider the same to be satisfactory, then you will of course accept, failing which, you will seek damages for this at the discretion of the Court.

 

Have a good think about it noli28 and try and decide what you would be satisfied with as compensation in order to resolve and bring closure to the dispute.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...