Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • now do you want help or just come here to rant at the 1st chance. is this indictive of why you have this issue with BG? there isn't one really just you being pedantic? now give us a chance to decide lets have some info. we don't accept .jpg picture files as they are displayed directly to screen whereby anyone members or not can see them, hence we require a multipage pdf properly redacted. theres a good upload guide to read on that. so ball is your court... we still would help our worst enemy regardless . dx
    • doh sorry was on phone screen. i think thats all ok,  let @AndyOrch confirm 1st please. dx  
    • Same date as poc then i dont like the agreement either, it just smells to me, but i can't find a like one of that era to compare against. this is only 10yrs old, so weight that up, i'd say enforceable & most are from the ear as a whole here. it cant be a recon as they must state so, and it wouldn't/doesn't need to have a tickbox+typed name to be so either. >80% loss if you go fwd, unless you can pay the CCJ within 30 days of judgement in FULL, might be time to consider a tomlin/consent, as much as i hate link, if you don't want to gamble on a very small chance of a win or can't pay within 30 days if you lose. what date is the hearing? dx    
    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Calor gas- can I get my money back?.


jackieB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Our estate is quite rural hence calor gas tanks. An engineer turned up one day saying he had come to install the telemetry. I had no idea that 1.He was coming 2. what the hell was it?.

He explained it connected to my phone line and when the tank capacity was down to 30% it would trigger calor gas company to come and fill it. I agreed saying I didnt know its was coming. He said I should have received a letter, I didnt.

Well after a few weeks, I realised it was interferring with my computer and disconnected it myself, rang and told them I didnt want to have automatic top up. I would let them know when I wanted the tank filled up.They said ok.

In january while I was out they came and filled the tank without me asking them!!.

My next invoice from them then claimed for the gas and my bill shot up from the existing £300 to a whopping £700 !!.

I cancelled my direct debit with them when I paid that bill.

I know await another supply of calor gas this morning. I rang them the other day and said I didnt want a full tank as I may be moving within the nexr few monthes. The chap on the phone said they would not give me less than 70% of gas. I will hover over the delivery man this morning to check, as I dont trust them.

 

Can I ask for the £400 back, which I didnt ask for?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don;t see how - it's not as if you didn't benefit from receiving the gas you were billed for. I can understand that from their point of view, if there's a tank on the premises, it makes sense to fill it, and the way prices are going they're not really going down (in the retail sector). I'm assuming you're being billed for bulk propane? The last time I looked the cost of this shot up when the delivered amounts were reduced by the consumer (it still costs the same amount to send the lorry). So are you really trying to get out of paying for the gas the company filled your tank with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I did not want any and told them I would have let them know when I did want some. There are many folks here who does not have a account with calor gas and their tanks stand empty. My account should have said no automatic top up as I asked them to.

As a friend says, if I had a coal fire I would order as much coal as I want, when I want, should be the same.

Its the fact they took it upon themselves to fill the tank without asking me first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you haven't answered the original question. Irrespective of whether you asked for the gas or not, are you attempting to keep what you received without paying for it? The same scenarion would hold true if you went to a filling station and set the pump to dispense £10. Due to a fault, it filled the tank and the cashier wants £70. The error was due to the pump, but that still does not mean you can keep what was dispensed in error, that would be theft. (My solution would be to reach an agreement where, in the absence of there being any mechanism for the retailer to take the supply back, that a price be reached based on the retailers actual cost of the supply, and the the reluctant purchaser accept this (reduced) charge).

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an ex-calor employee I know about these automated devices. I also know calor will deliver 100 litres if that's what the customer requires, you will find they will probably only deliver it on a day when they have a nearby delivery though, as okonski states it still costs the same to send the truck.

 

As far as I recall all the depots have at least 1 truck capable of pumping the gas back out. You could try the route of "you delivered it without me asking for it, so come and get it".

 

Good luck as I know they are not the easiest company to deal with

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'm not the only one thats happened to here, my neighbour had a delivery at 08.30 saturday morning while they were in bed and they too didnt ask for a top up. They said their tank was three quarters full already!.

 

Good answer though about' its your fuel come and get it!'.

The point is, to me, that I had told them before ,I didnt want automatic top up yet they did .Then expect me to pay for it!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just ordered a grocery delivery from Tesco and I dont expect more than I ordered, isnt that the same thing?.

 

No - beacue they would have taken full payment before delivery for a card. If they delivered more than you ordered, then they should take it back and refund the difference. However, you appear to have fuel that you haven't paid for, so to keep it would be classed as theft, you either have to give it back, let them collect it, or reach an equitible arrangement for a compromise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...