Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

natwest KEEP letting CFO drain my A/C using an OLD DEBIT CARD - SHAME ON THEM!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4078 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This has to be one of NatWests biggest foul ups for a long time.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

glad i brought it to your attention.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we are, nearly 8 months later.

 

CFO never responded or attempted to dispute my "dispute" on the money being returned to my account.

 

Today however, using their usual tricks of attempting mass multiple withdrawals for amounts such as £25 and £13

 

they have again emptied my account of my DLA (starting to think they attempt these things on known benefit payment days?)

 

So, using debit card details that are around 2-3 cards out of date,

so they certainly don't even have accurate card details or a card security code having their last mass transactions disputed,

but not even responding to that dispute,

 

Natwest has again let them walk into my account, with extremely questionable practices,

I mean come on, multiple payments of varying small amounts to 1 company at 5am isn't normal is it....

 

It would appear that Natwest offer no protection to its customers at all.

 

Again, no food/electric, and they refuse to do anything till the payment has "properly left my account"

 

So its going to be the identical big arguments on the phone tomorrow.

 

This time, I say Natwest itself is liable for refunding, and its their own problem whether they chase CFO or not

- I would say an unchallenged payment dispute from 8 months ago is pretty clear evidence that there is no sort of Continuous Payment Authority

desire or permission in operation, and Natwest has breached the regulations.

 

I am wondernig whether to take this via the fraud route this time?

 

Again, if CFO genuinely believes it is lawfully owed money, and can prove this,

why did it not challenge my Dispute of 8 months ago,

which it had every right too, and which Natwest assured me, CFO would.

 

So thinking Fraud.

 

I don't mean to be funny but as you know they will attempt to take money from any account of yours they have details for and can use cancelled cards why are you still using thataccount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=41_payday_loans

 

There are detailed instructions on cancellening CPAs in the National Debtline Fact sheet - linked above.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mean to be funny but as you know they will attempt to take money from any account of yours they have details for and can use cancelled cards why are you still using thataccount.

 

Because once told that you withdraw your permisson for the CPA to continue - both the bank - card provider - PDL are supposed to honour that !! Please see post #104

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason the payment is taking forever to actually clear, and until it does Natwest will not initiate a retailer dispute and return the money to me, could be tomorrow or even friday!Best thing is though a call centre person explained to me yesterday how Natwest actually deals with withdrawal of CPA - ie, they don'tWhat happens is an account is flagged, so if the flagged retailer attempts to take a payment a message will flash up saying "your CPA has been withdrawn.. Do you wish to continue YES/NO"So, Natwest complies with banking legislation by allowing someone who's CPA has been withdrawn to continue to draw payments by giving them the option to ignore the withdrawal of CPA. So Natwest, knownig this company has absolutely no authority to withdraw funds will continue to allow them.I fail to see how this even remotely fits in with the banking reg's requirement to honour the withdrawal of CPA by a customer.Natwest Fraud Unit is refusing to take a fraud claim which would get my money quicker because they understand CFO to be a loans company, and such a company would never ever commit fraud, is what the telepaths in the fraud centre are telling me.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt need to clear. They can cancel a transaction in progress.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...