Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and MBNA


Americanmuscle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3964 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My letter from MBNA states....

We've transferred ownership, together with the rights to collection, of your debt in relation to the above credit card account to MFS Portfolio LTD. You should await further information from MFS Portfolio as to what will happen next. Until you receive new payment instructions we'll process any payments made into our bank and transfer them on your behalf.

If you have given us details of your financial circumstances we'll provide this information to MFS Portfolio together with your recent payments (if any).

 

I am also sending MBNA and Reston's a letter asking what happens with the Charging Order as there has been no mention of it.

 

That's strange - they should be referring to the judgment rather than the credit card account.

 

As said earlier, the new lot are NOT allowed to collect until they are replaced as claimant.

 

 

Agree with DB - plus there simply cannot be any new payment arrangements other than a change of bank details as the payments have been set by the court. Until the original claimant has been replaced on the Judgment order, then I dont think they can actually collect anyway.

 

This looks like it is going to be quite interesting :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Agree with DB - plus there simply cannot be any new payment arrangements other than a change of bank details as the payments have been set by the court. Until the original claimant has been replaced on the Judgment order, then I dont think they can actually collect anyway.

 

This looks like it is going to be quite interesting :)

 

My payments were not set by the court when the CCJ was issued, Restons legal bod asked the judge about payments after she had issued the CCJ but the judge said that was a different matter as that court sitting was just to issue/decline the CCJ, I wrote to Restons the following day with an income/expenditure form and an offer of payment which they accepted and which I have kept up with ever since (even paying extra when I had available funds)

The Charging Order was applied for by MBNA/Restons 4/5 days after the CCJ was issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MBNA are being a bit presumptuous, in my view, in simply assuming you will just pay someone else.

 

When a judgment is involved, only the terms of the judgment count - if you're happy to pay, you could continue to pay MBNA. There is currently no requirement for you to change payee - stick only to orders if the court.

 

It's up to MBNA what they do with money you send, but don't pay the other lot until they seek and get the court's permission to be replaced as claimant.

 

A CCA request will, rightfully, be refused, as there is now no credit agreement in force. If you thought there was anything iffy with the account, it should have been challenged at the time, or a set aside should have been sought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Restons/MBNA put the terms of payment in writing?

 

Ok, have just found out the letter from Restons in reply to my letter with a monthly amount I have offered and it reads...

 

Due to the sizable balance and poor repayment history the claimant requires the security of a Final Chraging Order against your property. They do not require this for the purpose of requesting an Order for Sale but merely to ensure repayment of the judgement debt by way of a sale or remortgage at some point in the future.

On the basis the Final Charging Order is granted the claimant is prepared to accept repayments, as offered at the rate of £xxx per month, subject to reviews.

 

I'm as confused as the OP to why MBNA would sell off the debts they are guarenteed to get?! The only thing I could think of was to balance the books in this financial climate that is screwing everything!?

As I mentioned in an earlier post ref Charging Orders, would I be correct in saying MBNA can NOT just hand over the Charging Order with the account they have sold?

 

 

 

I was going to start my own thread but as I appear to be in the same position as the OP I thought it best to keep it all here as any replies would benefit us both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

americanmuscle, you don't really need to start a new post, it's reading to me that our situation are almost identical, I haven't heard anything from MFS yet but will sort a letter to MBNA/Restons tomorrow, had 12 hour shift today so no chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, have just found out the letter from Restons in reply to my letter with a monthly amount I have offered and it reads...

 

Due to the sizable balance and poor repayment history the claimant requires the security of a Final Chraging Order against your property. They do not require this for the purpose of requesting an Order for Sale but merely to ensure repayment of the judgement debt by way of a sale or remortgage at some point in the future.

On the basis the Final Charging Order is granted the claimant is prepared to accept repayments, as offered at the rate of £xxx per month, subject to reviews.

 

I'm as confused as the OP to why MBNA would sell off the debts they are guarenteed to get?! The only thing I could think of was to balance the books in this financial climate that is screwing everything!?

As I mentioned in an earlier post ref Charging Orders, would I be correct in saying MBNA can NOT just hand over the Charging Order with the account they have sold?

 

 

 

I was going to start my own thread but as I appear to be in the same position as the OP I thought it best to keep it all here as any replies would benefit us both.

 

Did I not read somewhere that MBNA is coming out of the UK Credit Card Market ?

 

If I am not having a senior moment and the above is correct, then that is probably why they are dumping anything that is not making them a profit.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/aug/16/mbna-jobs-risk-uk-ireland

 

Up to 4,000 jobs are at risk in the UK after Bank of America's decision to exit its MBNA credit card business. Another 1,000 jobs are under threat in Ireland, where the company has aggressively pursued market share since opening 14 years ago.

 

Phew.. no senior moment.. it is true. They are exiting.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so i sent a letter to both MBNA and Restons (to clarify I have been making all my payments to Restons) asking what happens with the CCJ and the CO, today I received their reply which reads....

 

RE Marlin Financial Services LTD v Yourself

The sale of the account affects neither the CCJ or FCO. We remain instructed in this matter. Our client would like to take this opportunity to review your financial circumstances with a view to obtaining an increase in instalments. We are also aware that you have received a refund of PPI premiums amounting to £1400.

To this end, please find attached a financial statement for your completion, may we please be in receipt of the same within the next 7 days.

 

 

I can assume from the above that Restons are now working for MFS Portfolio, and I think they have a bloody cheek asking for more money every month!

Well the mistake MBNA made was sending me the cheque for the PPI as that was cashed and used to pay off my mortgage arrears, my mortgage has been increased by 1% since last month and it also due another 0.5% increase in September so the chances of me paying more are slim to none! :roll:

 

I think my first response to Restons will be an updated income/expenditure sheet along with a letter directing them to their letter confirming they will accept £xx amount per month if they obtain a Charging Order (which they did) I will also point out to them that I have also always paid more per month than first agreed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Restons fib. MFS MUST be replaced as claimant. That's one for the SRA and OFT - deliberately misleading a debtor.

 

If that is the case i will ask in my letter if MFS have applied to the court to be replaced as the claiment for the C.O!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have deliberately misled you in their letter. They are saying you need to do nothing. That is rubbish. If the account has been assigned and there is a CCJ, they MUST apply to the court to be substituted as the claimant. And then they must tell you this has happened.

 

Suggest you contact the court on Monday to see if any permission has been sought.

 

Without permission, the CCJ is not collectable by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE Marlin Financial Services LTD v Yourself

The sale of the account affects neither the CCJ or FCO. LIE. We remain instructed in this matter.

 

Moreover, if they want to change the amount you pay, they will have to ask the court about that, too. Simply tell them your position has changed and you need to lower your payment (IF they get round to substitution).

 

They are implying that because they are still acting, nothing has changed. The judgment is not in their name, so ... Restons are liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE Marlin Financial Services LTD v Yourself

The sale of the account affects neither the CCJ or FCO. LIE. We remain instructed in this matter.

 

Moreover, if they want to change the amount you pay, they will have to ask the court about that, too. Simply tell them your position has changed and you need to lower your payment (IF they get round to substitution).

 

They are implying that because they are still acting, nothing has changed. The judgment is not in their name, so ... Restons are liars.

 

Leopard doesn't change its spots then.

 

Had a brush with them some time ago regarding an old MBNA account, (signed 1998).

 

CCA'ed them and first got told.

 

1. They don't need to pass this on to MBNA because they are solicitors not MBNA's agents. Oh really

2. They can bring action without complying. True, as I understand it, but it won't get them anywhere as MBNA no longer have the agreement.

3. They can reconstruct the agreement if it's no longer available. Not on a 1998 agreement.

Sent the request back to them and they ceased activity.

 

As an aside, uncommon for a firm of solicitors, if you ever see a pic of the Warrington office it has internal security grills on all the ground floor windows and a large external pull down roller door covering the main entrance. Expecting visitors?

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE Marlin Financial Services LTD v Yourself

The sale of the account affects neither the CCJ or FCO. LIE. We remain instructed in this matter.

 

Moreover, if they want to change the amount you pay, they will have to ask the court about that, too. Simply tell them your position has changed and you need to lower your payment (IF they get round to substitution).

 

They are implying that because they are still acting, nothing has changed. The judgment is not in their name, so ... Restons are liars.

 

I think what I will do is send a letter with my updated income/expenditure form, and inform them that due to the 1% increase in my mortgage payments

I will be reducing the amount I pay each month, I will however point out that it will still be more than the initial agreed amount.

Wonder what they will have to say about that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who do you actually pay the money to at present? Is it MBNA?

 

Ever since the CCJ obtained by MBNA my payments have been made to Restons, there was/is no court order on how much to pay, as in an earlier post the amount I offered each month was accepted by Restons/MBNA on account they obtained a Charging Order against my property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created on MBNA CCJ/transfer

please keep to your own threads.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever since the CCJ obtained by MBNA my payments have been made to Restons, there was/is no court order on how much to pay, as in an earlier post the amount I offered each month was accepted by Restons/MBNA on account they obtained a Charging Order against my property.

 

Was this a formal agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...