Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for uploading them wrong. Im not technical at all and self taught so bear with me as im trying my best. Thank you for all the info regarding the signs, this was my thoughts as well. Yes they have changed teh signs since this happened Ill ahve to have a look back through and see if when I took the pictures they were already the new ones or I have the old ones. I cant remember off hand. With regards to Europarks running the site now, Just to make you aware there is another small retail park just across the road and Im sure they are Europarks. The shops within that park are just Aldi and B & M. The site that we received the NTK has a few more shops, Home bargains, The food Warehouse, M & S food and a few others. I put these for identififcation purposes just in case it is the other site that you were looking at. The main entrance sign is on the bend on the left as you drive in the entrance so when you drive in from the right and turn in you can see it in front of you but if you drive in from the other way as we do then you dont see it unless you know its there and as you say you would have to stop to read it al anywayl. The main thing that always jumped out at us was FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in large letters. Please find the notice of hearing date attached and an offer letter I received from the vultures DCBLegal this morning,    notice of allocation group nexus.pdf vulture offer letter re group nexus.pdf
    • Good Afternoon Stu,  Many thanks for your reply. I will do as you suggest and email them for the exact terms. I shall have a look through the Tenancy Agreement too  myself  
    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SPML Mortgage PPI Interest-Unsure what to claim because of the misselling


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i reallly need some help.

I took out a secured loan many years ago 2003 i ahve been mis sold PPI was £2460 which was added to the loan.

Only problem is the PPI i was missold i was told that it ran for the duration of the loan,when in fact i found out that it only lasted 18 months.

 

How do i work out the interst owed to me.

The loan £14,760

Cash advance of £12,000

PPI £2460

Intro fee £300

APR of 14.3% over 180 months at £186.75

 

I am still paying the loan,my problem is where do i start to claim the PPI interest do i do it for 18 months or the duration of the loan or what.

I will be using the claim money i get back to take SPML to court

And help would be great cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

total cash price of PPI / total cash price of loan X 100 = xx%

 

then workout what xx% of your PCM was - that will be the PCM PPI element.

 

then fill out the FOS CQ

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

an SOC:

This first spreadsheet is the latest version of the statutory interestlink3.gif calculator and is used for Single Premium PPIlink3.gif cases. It can also be used where rollover PPI is involved, i.e. a new loan re-financing a previous one and where PPI is included in one or more loans.

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

and a coverign letter

 

fire the lot off to SPML

 

if you type in SPML in our search top right

there are many threads to follow.

 

 

pull our string if you need help

 

there is also a red tab on the SOC, read there too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Evil at SPML forwarded me on to a broker after my first letter of complaint so im going direct to the broker.

As i say its all going on taking the Evil to court.

 

DX i have that excel sheet and i cant for the life of me work out where i am going wrong, with regards to other things i know where i am going i know what im saying i kinow what i need to fill in everything is ready i just need to know how much interest to add on to my claim.

I cant for the life of me work it out

Link to post
Share on other sites

2460 / 14760 x 100 = 16.67%.

 

16.67% of each repayment you made was for PPI.

 

£186.75 x 16.67% = £31.13.

 

In the spreadsheet list the payments of £31.13 giving the date, the description (i.e. "PPI Payment") and the amount £31.13.

 

The spreadsheet will do the rest for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So i am to list every month i have paid the £33.13 ,will the spread sheet do the rest??

 

Also even though the PPI only lasted 18 months do i still use the amount of time of the loan??

Im still confused

Link to post
Share on other sites

You enter the payments you have actually paid to date...nothing more.

 

The "claim to" date should set to today's date.

 

The spreadsheet tells you in the green box what you have paid and the 8% on top. That is what you will get refunded to you.

 

The remainder of the loan should be restructured to remove the remaining PPI which as yet has not been paid.

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep spml!!

 

go read the other threads

 

DON'T jump in blind....

 

type spml into our search top right

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already complained to Asccenden and they said i must speak to Broker who brokered the loan,i never got any insurance documents through or anything.

 

Havent even started on them jokers they are just a debt collection company.

 

So back to these jokers then or the Broker ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

who are a dca?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who are a dca?

 

dx

Sorry just my term for stating that LMC/SPML/Capstone/Ascenden are not exactly lending nor exactly conform to lending principles,IMO they are just a debt colelction comapny making sure there loan book is kept up to date.

Im reading the threads and there are a lot of them, im going to write a letter stating the Ombudsman says it is you i chase for PPI etc etc and ill just take you to court.

Can i bypass the ombudsman and just take them to court???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right quick question now that i have everythign ready to go.

The FOS i have no faith in, i have tried to get them to look at these sharks and my account for years.

I wrote a letter of complaint a year ago asking for PPI back and was told to see the broker,now i know that they have lied to me with saying see the broker, can i just send them a letter saying 14 days or taking you to court or do i have to go to the FOS,who in turn will just tell me they changed comapnies and not liable.

 

Cheers

 

 

Also does someone have the the correct link saying from the FOS saying Broker is not liable but the mortagge company is???

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you've only ever just sent a letter.

 

IMHO i would start again

 

 

send them the FOS CQ

your SOC

and

a covering letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A similar thing with SPML happened to me. I took them court in 2008 and they put a barrister on it. The judge said they had changed companies and therefore I had made the claim to the wrong company. It was originally London Mortgage Company in conjuction with Matlock bath the broker Ocean Finance. It was then bought out by SPML who said they were not repsonible for the ppi so would not pay it. The judge said I could go back and reclaim but it could cost me a lot of money if I lost, basically he was trying to put me off.

 

I am hoping to reopen the case through the FOS but think I may well get the same answer as you that because it was sold on to SPML they are not responsible! I havent got a clue if its LMC or SPML to get the money back from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A similar thing with SPML happened to me. I took them court in 2008 and they put a barrister on it. The judge said they had changed companies and therefore I had made the claim to the wrong company. It was originally London Mortgage Company in conjuction with Matlock bath the broker Ocean Finance. It was then bought out by SPML who said they were not repsonible for the ppi so would not pay it. The judge said I could go back and reclaim but it could cost me a lot of money if I lost, basically he was trying to put me off.

 

I am hoping to reopen the case through the FOS but think I may well get the same answer as you that because it was sold on to SPML they are not responsible! I havent got a clue if its LMC or SPML to get the money back from.

 

Yeah i read your thread,thats why i mentioned it in my post. Maybe we shoudl sell our loans for a £1 and then say sorry we sold the loan on we are not liable.

Is there any cases that a main company has been found guilty over its subsiduary company,everyone knows how these people operate.

But its getting to a point now where a collective force needs to bring these jokers to account.

 

Has anybody here actually succefully claimed thousands back in charges or got their PPI back??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got my money back from a main stream credit card lender but I think these monkeys, all linked to Lehmans, you dont stand a chance. Ive read the FOS is linked to the banks anyway. When you look at what Barclays are getting away with you realise its people like us who take the loans and mortgages with these type of companies who end up paying every time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...