Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone can help. Last year I left a business I had been helping run which is now closed.

 

I left due to stress etc although nothing official but it was have a serious impact on my health. Anyhow the council tax was stupidly in my name and now they are chasing me at home.

 

I dont deny the bill and I am not against paying it. So when Bristow and sutor contacted me I sent them and email asking to pay £50 per week which they replied in a letter I could do for 5 weeks but wanted details of my benefit but I hadnt claimed after leaving the business so had nothing to send them, so I just kept on paying.

 

Then a few weeks ago I got another letter saying Failure to pay, this I thought was a comp error as I was still paying.

 

Then today there was a letter through the door saying a bailiff had called 'A BAILIFF REMOVAL TEAM VISITED TODAY TO REMOVE YOUR GOODS FOR SALE BY PUBLIC AUTION' its titled with the details for the bailiff and the line 'THE INITIAL CHARGE FOR TODAYS VISIT IS £180'

 

Now i have paid religiously for the last 12 weeks the £50 per week. I tried emailing them direct but they said the wont talk to me as the bailiff was involved and wont agree a plan.

 

My question is where do i go from here I really hate these people and their bullish tactics what would happen if i stopped paying them and sent the money direct to the council instead.

 

Please help :(

Edited by citizenB
spacing for easier reading
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were paying and can prove this, then there is something very wrong.

 

What type of benefit are you on - can you be classed as vulnerable ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not on benefits, I chose not to claim after the business. My husband works so he pays for everything atm. And im not classed as vulnerable no. I have kept all records from the payments made to these people 12 regualr payments made every Friday. I just wanna pay the council direct, i dont want to deal with these people but not sure of the consequences.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then today there was a letter through the door saying a bailifflink3.gif had called 'A bailifflink3.gif REMOVAL TEAM VISITED TODAY TO REMOVE YOUR GOODS FOR SALE BY PUBLIC AUTION' its titled with the details for the bailifflink3.gif and the line 'THE INITIAL CHARGE FOR TODAYS VISIT IS £180'

 

if they haven't got a levy on your goods then he cant remove your goods or charge a fee for todays visit

Link to post
Share on other sites

No attending to remove fee without a prior levy B & S come on don't be muppets

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they levy without you being here, sounds a dumb question I know but one i had to ask

 

 

they can and do levy on vehicles parked in the street or on you drive they also levy on garden furniture these thing they can levy without you being there because they are not in your house

 

If someone let them into your house they can levy

 

all of the above can be done without the debtor being present

 

but if they have made a levy then they legally on the day of the levy they must leave a notice of seizure of gods and inventory listing the goods levied

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they make a levy on goods the value of those goods must cover removal and storage costs, auction fees and realise a substantial portion toward the debt.

If the goods seized cannot cover these fees then the levy and subsequent seizure and sale of them can be argued to have been made purely for the bailiffs financial gain...if you owed £250 they would need to remove goods that would realise a minimum £2,500 when sold at auction.

 

That you are paying this CT without fail yet still being harassed by bailiffs being greedy then in my opinion you should pay the Council direct and raise a formal complaint with the Council using the argument you have no confidence in their appointed agents methods of collection and every reason to suspect they are creating a scenario that cannot been seen to exist in order to apply illicit fees.

 

Have you followed the golden guide to getting this started...asked the Council:

 

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

and asked the bailiffs to provide a breakdown?

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

Ref: Account No: 123456

Dear Sir

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

I require this information within 14 days.

Yours faithfully

Ripped off customer"

 

Until you get the facts you are not able to see the bigger picture...start with the above and paying the Council direct online, then you can tackle the bailiff misdeeds.

 

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they levy without you being here, sounds a dumb question I know but one i had to ask

 

 

I would agree with hallowitch, but it could be worth getting hold of the bailiff's Code of Practice or contract between the council and bailiff firm, as I came across this:

 

 

South Oxfordshire District Council's Code of Practice

 

 

7.4 Distress cannot be levied unless the debtor (or other responsible person in respect of NNDR debts) is present on the premises.

 

[EDIT]

 

Just noticed this relates to NNDR (business rates). Don't know why though?

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant remeber now or not whether they did stick a siezure notice through my door (I havent opened the door to them so never spoke to them) but the only thing on the drive would be a car which is in my husbands name and on hire purchase so they cant touch that right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may well have levied the car, and will argue that as it ia on the drive it is fairm game, and they will take it unless you prove they can't so be prepared for some paper tennis regarding the motor, if it has been seized, which of course once they are told of it's status, becomes an invalid levy, so associated fees must be removed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is vitally important to WRITE to the bailiff company ( any copy to the council) to make a complaint regarding the level of fees being charged by their agents.

 

A bailiff can charge a fee of £24.50 for "attending to levy" (where no levy was made). Alternatively , if a levy is made, the bailiff can INSTEAD charge a levy fee. You need to state that it would seem that a levy was made on a vehicle but that "levy" was done without making any enquiries and that in fact, the vehicle is not yours and instead, is your partners and furthermore, is subject to finance. Provide some evidence and request that all fees associated with this levy are immediately REMOVED.

 

This same complaint was recently the subject of a highly critical report from the Local Government Ombudsman were the Ombudsman made it clear that a levy should NOT be made without first checking ownership and that if the car is not owned by the debtor that ALL FEES should be removed.

 

I would suggest that you also ask the council WHY they are permitting THEIR AGENT to charge a sum of £180 at an "initial" visit as such a fee is clearly an "attending to remove" fee which can ONLY be charged if a VALID PRIOR LEVY had been made on goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok im going to send this to Bristow in response to their email do you think its ok?

 

Thank you for your reply I gave up work due to stress and what this was doing to my health. I do not claim benefits, I am being supported by my husband at the moment.

 

I have not refused to pay and have for the past 12 weeks paid £50.00 per week to clear this debt.

 

Details listed below:

 

Date Value Outstanding B&S ref

30/03/2012 50 1471653472 06/04/2012 50 1471661289 13/04/2012 50 1471666449 20/04/2012 50 1471674546 27/04/2012 50 1471679613 04/05/2012 50 1471688298 11/05/2012 50 1471694058 18/05/2012 50 1471699356 25/05/2012 50 1471708522 01/06/2012 50 1471713986 08/06/2012 50 1471720057 15/06/2012 50 1471724949

 

I feel the tactics being used by your company are nothing less than bullying someone who has paid regular payments for the last 12 weeks and would have continued to do so to clear the debt.

 

It would seem that a levy was made on a vehicle on our property but that levy was done without making any enquiries and that in fact, the vehicle is not mine and instead, is my partners and furthermore, is subject to finance.

 

I therefore request that all fees associated with this levy are immediately removed. I will today be lodging a formal complaint with Dudley Council and will commence payments with them directly tomorrow, the same day of the week I had sent through to you the last 12 payments.

 

Please find also enclosed a letter that will be sent to you recorded delivery tomorrow: Mrs Hxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxl xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx Bristow & Sutor Bartleet Road Washford Redditch B98 0FL 21st June 2012 Ref: XXXXXXXXX Dudley Council Ref: XXXXXXXX Dudley Council Ref: XXXXXXXX Dear Sir With reference to the above accounts, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes: a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee. b - the reason for the fee. c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged. d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at. e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject access request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information. I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully Mrs H xxxxxxx Any further dealings with your company will only be entered in to via written correspondence copies of which will be forwarded onto Dudley Council. Mrs Hxxxx xxxxxxxx

Edited by citizenB
spacing for easier reading
Link to post
Share on other sites

meh failing on the layout trying to fix :S

 

 

I have popped some spacing in for you. Unable to sort out the formatting for you though.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

THe letter looks fine :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok im going to send this to Bristow in response to their email do you think this is ok?

 

Thank you for your reply I gave up work due to stress and what this was doing to my health.

 

I do not claim benefits, I am being supported by my husband at the moment. I have not refused to pay and have for the past 12 weeks paid £50.00 per week to clear this debt. Detail listed below: (inserted here is 12 weekly payments with dates and their references).

 

I feel the tactics being used by your company are nothing less than bullying someone who has paid regualr payemtns for the last 12 week and would have continued to do so to clear the debt.

 

It would seem that a levy was mad on a vehicle on our proerty but that levy was done without making any enquiries and that in fact the vehicle is not registered to me and is in fact my husbands and furthermore is subject to finance.

 

I therefore request that all fees asocaited with this levy are immediatley removed.

 

I will today be lodging a formal complait with Dudley Council and will commence payments with them directly tomorrow, the same day of the week I had sent through to you the last 12 payments.

 

Please also find enclosed a letter that will be sent to you tomorrow recorded delivery. (inserted here is fee breakdown letter)

 

Any further dealings with your company will only be entered in to via written correspondance, copies of which will be forwarded onto Dudley Council. Yours xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Edited by citizenB
spacing for easier reading
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol i dunno whats happening with the spacing, retyped it all but thanks you for coming back to me so quickly really appreciate it

 

Very odd.. are you using something other than a PC/Laptop to post up?

 

I have found that sometimes you need to put an extra carriage return for paragraphs..

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all, Quite a weird thing happened, I have the letter I enclosed above ready to go out today recorded delivery. Was going to send it as an email then thought better of it (or so I thought). I must have sent the email without realising it as I have just recieved this email from Bristow & Sutor

Dear Madam,

 

 

RE: Outstanding debt recoverable under the Non Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations & outstanding Council Tax Arrears due to Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

 

We write with reference to the above and further to your recent email.

 

Firstly we apologise if you feel that you have reason to complain, our intentions are not to cause upset. However as we explained in our previous email to you 20/06/12 the arrangement of £50.00 per week was temporary only, as you didn’t contact us once this had expired with a further offer of payment we had no choice but to cancel the expired arrangement and continue with recovery action.

 

We have attached statements of your accounts to enable you to view the charges that have been incurred.

 

We are unable to breakdown these charges any further and can confirm that they have been charged in accordance with schedule 5 of The council tax (administration & enforcement) regulations 1992 (as amended) and schedule 3 of The Non-Domestic Rating (Collection & Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations 1989. The bailiff information that you have requested is as follows:

 

Date & time attended: 02/02/2012 07:50 Bailiff name: Miss xxxx Court and date certificated: Worcester County Court 04/04/2011

 

Date & time attended: 06/02/2012 12:48 Bailiff name: Mr xxxxx Court and date certificated: Worcester County Court 22/02/2011

 

Date & time attended: 28/02/2012 07:54 Bailiff name: Missxxxx Court and date certificated: Worcester County Court 30/08/2011

 

Date & time attended: 09/03/2012 14:39 Bailiff name: Mrxxxx Court and date certificated: Worcester County Court 23/01/2012

 

Date & time attended: 30/03/2012 13:36 Bailiff name: Mr xxxxx Court and date certificated: Worcester County Court 04/04/2011

 

Date & time attended: 20/06/2012 11:20 Bailiff name: Mrxxxxx Court and date certificated: Worcester County Court 22/11/2010

 

Regarding your comments relating to the levied vehicle, we will now make enquires into the ownership of the vehicle. Should the third party claim be proven we will then be able to review the charges incurred for the levy.

 

Further to your comments we would suggest that you pay Bristow & Sutor directly as payments made to the council will not prevent further recovery action, unless we are otherwise instructed by our client.

 

With the above in mind we would also suggest that you make a further offer of repayment to our offices by the 29/06/12, as your current offer of £50.00 per week to clear the total balance of £2447.65 is not acceptable.

 

Failure to comply with the above may result in further recovery action being taken against you, this may incur additional costs of which you will be liable for.

 

We trust that this clarifies the situation.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

Miss Nxxxx

 

Recovery Officer

 

Bristow & Sutor

The have also sent me account statements for the balances outstanding showing payments in and charges etc. There are 2 different accounts and the thing is I have made payments direct to the council this morning as I had stated in the email/letter. What do you suggest I do next?

 

I havent lodged the complaint with the council yet that was next on my list to do.

 

Thanks again for you help

 

(BTW regards the spacing issue im getting around it now by inserting manually the html break code, im on a normal desktop and never had this issue before, its weird. But least I can make it readable now.

Edited by seanamarts
names taken out
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the levy is invalid, which is very likely then all you owe is for two visits @ £42.50.

 

Why was the council tax in your name?

 

If you are no longer working in the business have you made enquiries to when the amount owed is for the time you were there. Is it for the correct amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...