Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Re: Benefit Overpayment and Tribunal


scotsbabe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I shall try and keep the story as short as i can.

Over a year ago i went for a Caution Interview with Dwp, regarding having a partner stay with me, I ended up with a substantial overpayment which i have been appealling. My health deteriated and have had mental health issues. I got a lawyer, who took on my case, got legal aid through mental health grounds, had my tribunal hearing the other day but did not win, Facts, was told by lawyer everything the dwp had was circumstancial, no evidence at all, had staements and witnesses at tribunal, i.e. ex partner, their partner of 2 years, neighbour, landlord. Expartner whom is now a very close friend has tenancy agreements going back many years, he did stay the odd night at mine purely to care and help with my disability, however at tribunal, no paperwork was handed in, lawyer handed this in on the morning when my hearing was, should have been in weeks prior, did not state anything regarding my mental status and severe anxiety and that was why he was there, so during my interview i did get confused at times, and because of my confusion declined my case being successfull . I have done nothing wrong except letting this good friend of mine use my home for mail purposes only. I am at my witts end with worry, dont know what i can do next, but also have the problem where the council have now followed suit going only on the basis of what the dwp have told them and now have a large overpayment from them, there is no links no hard proof whatsoever just all circumstancial, oh and also because he was a named driver on my mobility car which was due to me not knowing anyone else that could take me to appointments etc and could drive

PLEASE HELP AND ADVISE!!!! Feel as if the lawyer did not have a clue as to what he was doing, should have also mentioned did not get all witness in

Edited by scotsbabe
forgot to add a bit in
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask the upper tier tribunal for permission to appeal the first tier tribunal's decision if there is an error of law. Before you do this, you need to write to the tribunal to request a statement of reasons. You must do this within one month of the tribunal. You may find it helpful to seek free representation for this. Some CAB's offer representation and some local councils have Welfare Representation units. Also as Nystagmite suggested contact RNIB - they may be able to offer help or refer you to a rep.

 

If your solicitor has not acted in your best interests you can complain. Initially you should complain to the firm that he works for.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops! I think both Nystagmite and I got your thread mixed up with another on here.

 

The remainder of the advice stands.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

scotsbabe

 

in a social security tribunal, the level of proof required is "balance of probabilities" - therefore the council do not need to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

 

where the evidence is circumstantial, it is still relevant - enough circumstantial evidence against you and the tribunal will find against you

 

was your partner your husband, ex-husband or an ex boyfriend? as the rules vary depending upon whether you are married or not

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your reply, my partner was my husband but we separated over 14 years ago, he has had his own partners same with myself, i did inform the council however that i had someone stay the odd night maybe 1 or 2 nights a week some weeks never as he had his own place,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, as you have mentioned separated rather than divorced, am i right to assume you remain legally married?

 

If you are married to an alleged partner, the test that is applied is whether you living in the same household

 

As ErikaPNP advised previously, the first thing you should do is write to HM Courts and Tribunals Service an obtain copies of : -

 

  1. the Record of Proceedings (these are the judges notes from the hearing)
  2. the Statement of Reasons (this is a more detailed explanation as to how the judge came to his/her decision)

 

 

As soon as you get these documents, you need to speak a Welfare specialist who can assist you with trying to identify an error of law.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am now divorced, but for the period they have claimed back money yes, i was still married but being honest did not even cross my mind as to being married as i lived a single life for over 14 years which is a long time, is his tenancy agreements not proof that he was not living with me? Also dont know if you can help inn this matter, but can the lcoal council evict you for rent arrears?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, with tenancy agreements and also of his former partner for 3 years and his now partner of 18 months, problem is he used my address for mail purposes as he was having probs at his first tenancy where he was renting a room within a flat shared by another 4 people and found my home to be safe for this purpose and also because he near enough was at my house checking on my because of my illness/disability

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at my witts end here, as i now have lost first tier tirbunal have a very large overpayment of more than £10,000 for something that i have not done, i have never taken money from him, only stayed the odd night sometimes never, are totally indepaendant and non dependant of each other, all evidence was there, but because my head is not where it should be and i get stressed, confused so easily and mix things up, i loose my case..........does not seem fair, judge at tribunal only spent about ten minutes listening, now that council are also following suit without investigating me, have that overpayment also, and call today saying about court because of rent arrears, i am in fear of loosing my house, can this happen ? I dont even get £100 pw have been on benefit for years as i cannot work

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you appealed against housing benefit and council tax benefit overpayments?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i have not appealed against them yet, was just told that they overpayment from them was because of what they dwp said, (as in that i had a partner staying with me for ? period of years) which as i have stated is not true, all i have done is ask them for a statement of reasons for their decision but as yet have not had a reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry should have also said that, the phone call i goty today about court proceedings regarding rent arrears are just from feb this year till now....... hence i am on benefit of under £100 a week had to fill in another housing benefit form dont know reason why back in february and as yet they still have not decided if they are going to allow me housing benefit, a few weeks ago they had asked for"as they call, my so called partner" his address, which i gave them but thought it was none of mine or their business as i have nothing to do with him and now legally divorced . But i have been waiting now 4 months now to see about my housing benefit and they still not come to decision but was told today i should have been paying rent which is £80pw which would leave me £12pw to live on and pay bills etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

if hb/ctb were not part of your previous tribunal, you have a separate right of appeal against those decisions, in which case you should appeal, a different judge might reach a different decision

 

in respect of your latest claim, assuming you have provided all the evidence requited, the council should have made a decision within 14 days, if they have failed to do so, submit an official complaint addressed to the chief executive

 

in relation to dwp overpayments, you need to get specialist advice to see if you can challenge the judge's decision

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...