Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My other received a letter from Marstons saying they are coming round to remove goods.

 

Now, I know they can't without gaining peaceful entry....or can they?

 

As far as the oh is aware this is for parking fines from 2001

but they state in the letter that they have the right to use a locksmith.

 

I'm pretty sure they can't but I just need some clarification.

Is it just one of their many scare tactics?

 

They haven't been round to see us yet despite the letter (dated 18th May) that they would attend within 7 days.

 

Trying to find out exactly what he owes the money for is nigh on impossible.

The letter gives no clues other than HMRC Kent.

They aren't particularly forthcoming through written communication and phoning them is a no go.

 

I won't be letting them in, the oh does not own a car (it's in my name),

they can't get in through open windows as we are in a flat (unless they are spiderman or bring ladders with them).

 

However, they need to get through the main door to the block first before getting to my door

and this seems to be a grey area.

 

If they get through that main door can they then use any force to enter my flat as they have,

I suppose, gained entry to the premises (even if I don't let them in, they can just buzz someone else).

 

Not too worried as I have already seen them off for another matter by simply ignoring them.

 

Also, my oh works 6 days a week so he wouldn't be here when they attend anyway, unless they are lucky.

 

I will be alone, with a 10 month old baby and they will be very "frightening and intimidating" (:roll:).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither.

He owes no tax as he has always been PAYE and I can't think why he'd owe VAT.

It definitely says HMRC Kent on it.

 

He did have another one with Marstons for the DVLA but that was returned to the court and sorted.

 

This is for something else (different amount).

 

He has never committed crime so it's not a fine, never been self-employed etc.

He can only think of parking fines.

 

In 2001 he was living on the site where he worked so it can't be related to council tax, water rates, electricity etc., etc.

 

Like I say, they won't tell us and HMRC Kent does not exist.

..there are lots of courts in Kent,

but not one called HMRC Kent.

 

No court number, had nothing from any court...nothing.

 

Anyway, he wasn't living near Kent at the time.

 

e was in Wales.

 

I am totally clueless, but I just wanted to know, for sure, that they won't be breaking in anytime soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they send a bill for allegedly underpaid PAYE when they cocked up last year as they are chasing people who have never been within a million miles of self assessment, for this allegedly underpaid tax?.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It says HMRC but i'm wondering if it's a typo and should be HMCS...

 

The oh did get a letter about underpayment of tax but that was for 2008/09. We paid it months ago (it was only about £120). Definitely not that as this is for a higher amount from 2001.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget if their records show 2001 it could be another underpayment for that tax period and they are saying they sent you letters by invisi-mail that you never got?

 

If your letter says HMRC then it is definately tax/insurance related. We all know they are only interested in saying they are right but very reluctant to prove it?

 

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a root around and found another letter from them from months ago. It's for the same amount but it says HMCS Kent. That one has no information either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you contacted all the courts in kent, I know that this is a huge task, but if marstons are not telling you what court then perhaps you would need to have a hunt yourself.

 

I would also place a complaint into Marstons and see where you get from there.

 

http://www.marstongroup.co.uk/assets/Complaints-procedure-.pdf

 

[email protected] close any gaps

 

Subject it as Formal complaint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Huge task indeed. As we have no court reference number and have no idea which address the oh was even living at at the time. Still confused about it being Kent when he lived in Wales and still wondering about this locksmith business....I am presuming it's a scare tactic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it possible that is a parking fine from before PCNs were decriminalised

 

been having a look round and found this thread from December 2011

 

HMCS kent surrey and sussex finance centre

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?331920-Marston-and-fixed-penalty-collection

 

 

this is the closest i can fined but its a place to start

http://212.137.36.113/HMCSCourtFinder/Search.do;jsessionid=9B2D998818AC3E29B544E99BD900D59B

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...