Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Carer Work Activity


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My son is Scizophrenic and receives DLA middle rate care and low rate mobility him and his partner have 3 children they have been on income support for 13 years my sons partner as been depressed for a few years and gets low care DLA and low care mobility. My sons partner gets the underlying entitlement to carers allowance for looking after my son.

 

ESA sent forms 6 months ago my sons partner had a medical with Atos and was placed in the WRAG group 4 months later she as had to fill another ESA form in and as heard nothing yet mean while she as been sent for to go to see an advisor he said she would be hearing from Ingeus Uk about going on a weekly work related activity.

 

Everything I have read up on states that anyone receiving care allowance who is a full time carer will not have to take part in the work related activities I am so confused, my sons partner told her advisor that she is a full time carer and he said this made no difference. My son`s partner explained to her advisor that she could not leave her partner alone so he said "Bring him with you" my son as been so stressed and agitated about all this and he can become quite challenging. All this sounds quite unacceptable to me, my son is in a state and his partner as been in floods of tears as she does not know how my son is going to react about all this.

 

Have the rules suddenly changed to carers having to go on work related activities? as there is nothing on the internet that states this:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The requirement to carry out work related activity applies to those in the work-related activity group. The following are not required to take part in work related activity;

 

those in the ESA support group

lone parents on ESA with a child under the age of 5; and

ESA claimants who also receive carers allowance or a carer’s premium.

 

From here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Laura

I think a complaint to the JCP manager should be done. It seems the 'advisor' didn't know much about WRAG rules and in my opinion giving out misleading information just adds to distressed disabled people.

We complain about Atos but it seems the JCP advisors are just as bad. I was put in WRAG and was asked what I would do when my ESA stops in a years time. I'm on income based, not contribution, and as far as I know will continue as long as I pass the 'medical'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son`s partner as claimed income support for the family since 1999 as my son does not read or write and as mentioned as severe mental health, my son`s partner must be on IB though I am not sure about this as she was originally on it as she had a child under 5 not because she had ill health herself she then became my sons carer and claimed carers allowance and receives the underlying entitlement to it.

 

Their benefit must have gone to ESA? really confused but she had a call from these people she as to meet and she retold them she is a carer and they just said "That doesn`t matter surely you can leave him for half a hour" my son`s partner told them it would be a hour on the bus then the time with them where do they get half a hour from?

 

I rang someone at the unemployed workers centre and they said it`s complicated that DWP are now interpreting that if you can do the chores of caring you can manage a work programme, this is ludicrous as if you are a full time carer for 35 hours or more how can you also be on a work programme? and caring can come in all forms just making a cup of tea or talking to someone is classed as caring!!!!

 

not sure what to do next but if she takes my son with her his safety will be at risk as so will the staff were his partner as to go to as he is likely to kick off and it is not very pleasant when he does you cannot calm him down all this wants sorting it is making the mentally ill much worse with the stress

Link to post
Share on other sites

U/E is paid because IB was in payment then. They have now been transferred onto ESA, but are now subject to the rules of the WRAG.

Another option is using the U/E to Carers as condition of entitlement nip back onto I.S.

CA would be put back into payment but benefit entitlement will remain the same.

No WRAG rules on I.S, just an option

Link to post
Share on other sites

It`s not an interview it is work related activity she had a letter today to say she must bring a cv along to it the building is 2 bus rides away she is depressed herself exasperated by the pressures of living with my son she does not need this she would have no idea how to do a cv.

 

Yes heard about remaining on IS why didn`t they leave this as it was so she just a carer what can we do to sort this? I am puzzled why it says carers do not have to take part in work related activities to then be told this makes no difference:???:

Edited by Laura Cooke
Link to post
Share on other sites

they didnt leave her on I.S because at the time her main condition of entitlement to it was her IB, she could have chosen to stay on I.S but would have had to declare this at the time. So when IB ceased they shifted her to ESA and closed her I.S

 

If she really cant attend these activies she should go back onto I.S. There are WFI on I.S but bear no relation to ESA WFIs.

 

I suppose they look at it like this, she is on ESA and in the WRAG so she has to attend these meeting. do they know she has u/e to CA.

She should be excempt according to this,

 

The requirement to carry out work related activity applies to those in the work-related activity group. The following are not required to take part in work related activity;

 

those in the ESA support group

lone parents on ESA with a child under the age of 5; and

ESA claimants who also receive carers allowance or a carer’s premium.

 

but I am not ESA trained so they may be other sets of rules that apply :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

they didnt leave her on I.S because at the time her main condition of entitlement to it was her IB, she could have chosen to stay on I.S but would have had to declare this at the time. So when IB ceased they shifted her to ESA and closed her I.S

 

If she really cant attend these activies she should go back onto I.S. There are WFI on I.S but bear no relation to ESA WFIs.

 

I suppose they look at it like this, she is on ESA and in the WRAG so she has to attend these meeting. do they know she has u/e to CA.

She should be excempt according to this,

 

The requirement to carry out work related activity applies to those in the work-related activity group. The following are not required to take part in work related activity;

 

those in the ESA support group

lone parents on ESA with a child under the age of 5; and

ESA claimants who also receive carers allowance or a carer’s premium.

 

but I am not ESA trained so they may be other sets of rules that apply :(

How would one know to stay on IS instead of going on ESA DWP do not advise you of this and every where on internet states carers do not have to do the work related programme yet she as been ignored when she as told DWP this

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wouldnt know to stay on I.S. The IB to ESA transfer has caused loads of problem, the offices who do the transfers dont look fully at the cases, they just change the claims over to ESA from I.S. If the customer fails the medical even though they may have another COE they close the claim.

It drives us mad as we have to reopen the effected claims it makes a lot of work and frustrating for the customer.

 

If they are aware she is a carer and still insisting then she may have to consider going back to I.S

I will have a look at the rules again for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may have to :( Carers claiming ESA may be able to postpone interviews and work-related activity because of their caring responsibilities.

 

but have found this site which looks useful and you can ring them for help and advice on this

 

www.carersuk.org/help-and-advice/help-with-money/benefits-a-tax-credits/other-benefits

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was on IB and carers premium on pension credits as my wife get DLA MRC, when I got the phone call about moving to ESA I said I wanted to move to carers allowance and have my wifes pension credits raised.

 

I was told to fill out the ESA50 and take it from there. I filled out the form and was put into the support group. I am now worried sick that when Universal credit comes out we'll be put on the couple rate and subject to all the working age benefit caps, and my wife will lose pension credits and her pension will be counted towards UC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The changes to welfare benefits is surely making people ill and adding to peoples fears shame this government were not as ruthless in other quarters I think "The poor, vulnerable and disabled have nothing to fear" these are the very people they are persecuting and causing untold misery to I hope all this back fires on them because I have never seen such hate for the disabled and people reliant on the welfare state, they are deemed the lowest form of society by this Lib Dem/Con government yet it is quite easy to land on benefits and to become unwell in today`s society this is just my point about anyone can fall on hard times http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/may/29/benefits-system-fit-for-work

Link to post
Share on other sites

will Universal Credit sort it out, we will find out soon, very soon :)

 

Well surely things cannot be made much worse or can they I would not put it past this government to bring back work houses they seem to have no limit on what they intend to do to crush the vulnerable, and strangely change the rules or move goal posts to get their way, how they sleep at night is beyond me

Link to post
Share on other sites

If my sons partner stops her ESA and asks to go back on IS what will this entail? will she lost the carers premium or will that just be reinstated in her IS and any idea how long this procedure takes as they cannot live without money indefinately and then their rent with the council will be messed up too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nystagmite, Welfare Rights said to make a claim for IS again and to stop the ESA you just had to ring up a number they gave we did this took a hour on the phone then after this he said my son`s partner as got to go into the benefits agency on the 11th June to sort the claim? thought that`s what we had done by phone? so the ESA as been stopped so god knows when they will get money again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did the phone claim, but you still have to go into JC just to sign the forms, only took 10 minutes for me as it's all on their system, then they send it off to your appropriate claims office, just to point out, as I have just been thru this, although I did the phone claim, it's actually dated from the day you go into sign, and does not get looked at until the benefits office dealing with your area get it, so it does delay things. As mine took 8 days from me doing the on phone application just to get to them, then I was told it could take upto 3 weeks from them getting the paper work, delayed also by the bank holidays, I'm looking at no money for at least a month.

 

they could be in for a long wait if they are not signing the forms till the 11th.

 

good luck with it all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cocoriver really appreciate this info makes you laugh it taking so long to get into JC if it was to their advantage they`d have you in pronto my sons partner got nearly 2 week just to get in to sign, suppose next think Council will write to say they not getting their rent/council tax covered oh the joys of being dependent on welfare

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your welcome, it's a good thing to have this site to get some help from others in the same situations, I'm sure your the same, I have had so much conflicting info from DWP call centre etc, I come on here to get a clearer idea from people who really know from experience.

 

good luck with it all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh so true this site as been a life saver to me I have a brain damaged husband, a scizophrenic son and a bipolar daughter without this site I think I would have lost all hope I have been to hell and back at times. Only today I was saying no wonder so much money lost in mistakes by DWP far more than fraud. Every time you speak to DWP you get conflicting advice each time and to be fair that seems to be the norm in most places HMRC are just the same as my sister was in HR till she died in 2010 leaving me her 3 orphaned sons one being diabetic and autistic she had been widowed 7 years. Wish my family could get a break in all the bad luck we have had over the past few years.

 

Good luck yourself and to all thise unfortunate enough to be reliant on benefits as you are demoralised now being dependent on welfare

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...