Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
    • Not at all.  The onus is on them to ensure that their invoice respects the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to establish keeper liability.  Which it can't as the area is covered by bye-laws. Spot on. Irrelevant as to whether you entered into a contract with VCS to pay them £100 if you didn't obey what was written on their silly signs. Who cares?  What about their ridiculous generic Particulars of Claim where they deliberately mix up driver and keeper. And where do they mention this?  You haven't shown us anything. Of course you have to prepare a Witness Statement and you'd better get on with it. This is the problem here - you've disappeared for months & months, haven't kept us updated and presumably haven't read other VCS threads.  That needs to change - now. Otherwise you will lose - simple as that. For a start - please upload the court order which fixes the hearing date plus plus where "VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet".  We're not mind readers.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Redundancy Help - Urgent!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone can help.

 

I've been with a company just under 2 years. 2 years as of **th June. They started redundancy consultation today and informed me that I have no right to redundancy pay way there is a PILON clause in my contract.

 

I'm being made redundant because I applied for flexible working hours etc so I know this is going to Employement Tribunal but I'm not due to see my solicitor until Thursday.....the redundancy stuff has happened since the last time I spoke to my solicitor. I've also been off sick due to the stress of it all and I've made a complaint about the way I've been treated since my return.

 

How do I holt the consultation until I've spoken to my solicitor? I don't want to say anything in the consultation that will harm my tribunal case but I don't want to be seen as unreasonable by refusing to have the next consultation. I'm also trying to reduce the stress of all of this. Having to go to a consultation before I'm ready is very stressful.

 

My solicitor could only breifly speak to me over the phone and (quite rightly so) refuses to give too much advice over the phone. But did say that them forcing me to meet when I'm not ready and not giving me adequate time to prepare for the consultation will only go against them.

 

Advice please? I'm trying to avoid going off sick again, as I'm sure they'll try to use it against me even though I've got a great employment record.

Edited by dmlferguson
Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware, the fact that you have a contractural PILON should not prevent you from receiving statutory redundancy pay ( you can read more about this on the Directgov website)

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dml,

 

Sorry to hear about the proposed red.

 

There's lots of issue in your post. You seem to be on the potential most valuable one - if you can link the dismissal to the statutory right (the flexi working request). No doubt your solicitor will give you more details about this.

 

Remember to get stat redundancy pay (SRP), you need to have been working for 2 years at the effective date........ and you are not at 2 years continuous employment - yet....

 

There is no 'real' relationship between what you are entitled to if made red, and notice pay whether PILON or not.

 

Just to be clear an employee with 2 years continuous service at the date they are dismissed for reason of red is entitled (at least) these to 3 things:

 

1) SRP - max £430 per week - calculated on a scale that relates to age and length of service

2) Notice pay - u may have to work to get this, but should still get this if you not allowed to work it. It should be at least 2 weeks in this example.

3) Accrued but untaken hol pay.

 

As for trying to delay the consultation, u need to tell us a bit about the employer's rationale for the redundancy.

 

Hope this is some help.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help.

 

Because I have PILON in my contract my redundancy starts at the day I am given notice. So if before the 2 years then I do miss the cut off. Not that this makes a difference because its unfair dismissal anyway.

 

The reason for redundancy is restructuring of the department due to reduced fees....which I contest. Also due to no new work coming in....although the current workload is too much to handle as it is. I've been advised to formally ask for the consultation to be extended in order to speak to my solicitor. They've already said no when I asked informally.

 

Do you have any advice??

 

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do you stand with redundancy consultation and compassionate leave? To add to the stress I've now had a bereavement in the family. I obviously need to take some time off but where does this leave me with the consultation phase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do you stand with redundancy consultation and compassionate leave? To add to the stress I've now had a bereavement in the family. I obviously need to take some time off but where does this leave me with the consultation phase?

 

Hi dml,

 

Very sorry to hear about this on top of the problems at work. You may know that the death of certain people can trigger a legal right to some unpaid time off work for what they normally term, 'Dependant Leave' see http://www.unitetheunion.org/resources/equalities_2011/equalities_-_legacy_content/equalities_resources/employment_rights_for_working/your_right_to_dependant_s_leav.aspx

 

There are various reasons an employee could be legitimately absent from work, such as the above or because of sickness etc... . But the point is that I'm not sure that even absence from work is going to stop your consultation continuing. An employer could do all they could to keep an absent employee 'in the loop' during the consultation process (e.g. send minutes of meetings ask for written representations, offer to elect a rep etc) and the eventual dismissal might be fair.

 

In fact if your employer's rationale for the redundancy was to to save costs then assuming sufficient time for genuine consultation, a semi-legitimate aim of theirs may be to ensure that consultation is concluded as soon as possible to minimise the costs they have to pay to employees in terms of statutory payments.

 

In your case your employer almost certainly has realised that to dismiss you before your 2 years service will save them money, and I'm sure they will try to do this if they really do make you redundant.

 

Perhaps a grievance might throw a spanner in the works, but this culd be equally fruitless. You should ask your solicitor for more advice.

 

Best of luck

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...