Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cobbetts Cpr part 18 request/CPR part 16.4.1


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 425
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

all

 

I am coinsidering the action below following the LACK OF RESPONSE FROM COBBETTS in respect to my application for CPR 18 request for further information

 

 

REQUEST FOR THE NatWest DEFENCE TO BE STUCK OUT

1. It is respectfully requested that an order be made striking out the defence in this action as an abuse of process

2. The basis for this is the fact that the Defendant is continuing to settle all claims of this nature where Claimants are seeking reimbursement of bank charges, with no claims proceeding to a contested hearing.

3. The Defendant cannot and not give reasonable grounds to object to this request as the claimant submitted and gave reasonable time to respond to an application under CPR 18 request for further information.

The defendant has failed to respond within the requested timeframe. Further the defendant made great efforts to submit CPR 18 to the plaintiff and further requested that the Courts order Direction to enforce the Plaintiff to respond to application under CR 18, it is of note that the defendant has duly complied with this order of the court. It is of note that the Court took the Defendant on face and Order the Defendant to comply with this CPR18 so as to prepare their defence. It is also noted that the direction hearing of the 25th May 2007 contained sufficient information to the defendant that the plaintiff would be filing a request for further information to the defendant. The court acknowledge that this would probably be the case and hence order a second Direction Hearing Date.

The plaintiff rather than wait for this date to have the court formerly give Direction to the Defendant to answer the request under CPR18 submit the aforementioned with the view to reduce costs and avoid the waste of the Courts Valuable time.

This request, for further information CPR18, was submitted to the defendant on the 31 May 2007 with a response date of the 15th of June 2007.

It is now clear that the defendant wishes to delay the outcome of this application and waste the courts time and subsequently increase the costs suffered by both the court and the Plaintiff in this delaying action.

It is therefore requested that the Court Strike out the Defendants DEFENCE and grant to the plaintiff settlement and costs in this case.

StevePM

If anybody has any view on this I would appreciate it

StevePM

 

If you find this useful please tip my scales

 

First win £5k+ another five on the go all with NatWest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote 3. The Defendant cannot and DID not give reasonable grounds to object to this request as the claimant submitted and gave reasonable time to respond to an application under CPR 18 request for further information.

 

Need to add 'Did' or 'has not gave'

 

otherwise,think it sayswhat it needs to

 

CM

  • Haha 1

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

After initially refusing to reply to Cobbetts CPR 18 request I have now been ordered by the judge to do so. Am I right in just reproducing the document on page20?

 

Also, my case has been listed for a Case Management Conference and allocation hearing. Is this normal? If it's happened to anyone before can you let me know if the defence turned up and what happened either way.

 

thanks,

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could Martin Moderator please empty his storage space, i need to PM something

 

CM

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Court may order claimants to comply with CPR16 4.1

Cobbetts are known to have asked for this in particular where claimants have not followed guidelines or stuck to well tried and tested POCS.

Here is an overview.

Check the points and make sure your claim form has addressed them all.

 

 

 

 

CPR 16.4

 

top_icon.gif

Contents of the particulars of claim 16.4 (1)Particulars of claim must include –

(a)a concise statement of the facts on which the claimant relies;

(b)if the claimant is seeking interest, a statement to that effect and the details set out in paragraph (2);

©if the claimant is seeking aggravated damages (GL) or exemplary damages (GL) , a statement to that effect and his grounds for claiming them;

(d)if the claimant is seeking provisional damages, a statement to that effect and his grounds for claiming them; and

(e)such other matters as may be set out in a practice direction.

(2)If the claimant is seeking interest he must –

(a)state whether he is doing so –

(i)under the terms of a contract;

(ii)under an enactment and if so which; or

(iii)on some other basis and if so what that basis is; and

(b)if the claim is for a specified amount of money, state –

(i)the percentage rate at which interest is claimed;

(ii)the date from which it is claimed;

(iii)the date to which it is calculated, which must not be later than the date on which the claim form is issued;

(iv)the total amount of interest claimed to the date of calculation; and

(v)the daily rate at which interest accrues after that date.

 

(Part 22 requires particulars of claim to be verified by a statement of truth)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, i have just completed reply to N R request for more info part 18.Anybody care to run the evil eye over it

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/96972-celicaman-northern-rock.html?highlight=celicaman+vs+northern+rock

 

Appreciate any comments

 

CM

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh nearly forgot, Also sent them a request for more info part 18 CPR, asking for how they work out their charges etc. should be fun seeing how fast they reply to that (never)

 

CM

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry .

Lots of claimants have expressed concerns that Cobbetts were requesting the part 18.

We know they read this site,and several claimants have warned they will referre the matter to the court.

I know of 1 claimant who has made a complaint to the law society and I think Cobbetts are aware of the implications of this.

So maybe they will refrain from using these practices in the future I hope they do,as many claimants patience is wearing thin.

 

 

Hi Martin

Hoping for help

Received defence from cobbetts today, and realise i have made a few errors. i have made my claim through MCOL and have not stated my account number. second i havent forwarded a schedule of charges to the court although sent to the bank. Finally 3 of the charges go outside the 6 year limit.

Should i send an ammended schedule or stick to the origanal as the ammended will not add up to the figure given to MCOL.

Cobbetts have requested more info persuant to CPR part 18, asked to provide a response to CPR 18 in 12 days or they will request an order striking out the claim in view of the deficiences in the way the claim is pleaded.

 

Is all lost

 

Thanx to all who help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joe28,

dont panic, all is not lost

Im going out soon, so cant advise yet, will be tomorrow. If you have not done so, start own thread and put in it exactly what you have sent and exact wording of what they have asked for.

I have just had same thing Re Northern rock and we have filled in what they wanted & also sent them the same part 18 request for proof of their costs in charges, they have to reply in same 14 days.

Its pretty daunting when you get it.

We and you do not have to supply it, but we have, and told them so in the reply, however by sending it we are able to send our request to them, they will not answer it so we will be able to apply to have their claim struck out instead :)

 

I got 5 mins here so first look.

1. Dont worry about amending details, they know the correct amounts and will not pay what you are not entitled to.

2. You could fight 3 charges outside of 6 years using the limitations act, how much are they worth ?

3.account number, well its got this far, they know who you are.

 

This is all scare tactics, dont worry.

You do need to send the court a copy of your summary sheet and another copy exactly same to cobbets ASAP

 

The Court Manager,

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

Or change this adress if you have a transfer of proceedings letter with the address of the new court

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(Your Name) –v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges taken from me by the defendant, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

And this one to cobbets

 

Dear Sir,

 

(Your Name) -v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my schedule of charges relating to the above claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

will check your thread later. Dont worry its all goingto plan

Celicaman

 

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i see you have started own thread. Fill in what you can.

At which point did you not put your account number on.

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted on your thread troubled2.

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, court hearing on Wednesday and heard absolutely nothing from Cobbetts. They havnt even filed papers with the court. Surely if I hadnt filed my court bundle in time, this claim would have been thrown out - shouldnt that be the case with the bank too? I have everything ready to take to court on Wednesday. Is there anyone else that has had to attend the hearing? Can you tell me what I might expect? I know its fairly informal with DJ at head of table and claimant and defendant/cobbetts on the other side (if they turn up). But will the DJ just start off by putting the ball in my court (soz about the pun!) and asking me to explain why I think the charges unfair? Losing sleep now - wish this whole thing was over and done with! Jhamb - Have put this on my own thread but wasnt sure exactly how this system works and whether people can see you have posted new message! Soz if repeating myself too much - its probably nerves!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

have started MCOL back in 13th May07 ,got the standard Cobberts letter pack on 15th June & still awaiting a letters from the court & a date. Mean while charges for me overdraft are still pilling on at £28 plus the intrested (i pay them £360 a mth they add another odd £60 in charges).

Do i take this on the chin or write again to Natwest /cobbert & the courts to add this to my total claim. :mad::-x :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Swampy, please start a new thread in the nat west forum - that way we can advise you properly on your claim.

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, New to this site and have just received CPR part 18 request from Cobbetts. Thanks so much for the helpful advice so far as didn't have a clue what to do until I joined up. Will let you know how things proceed!

Cheers

 

Charlieparly, as per above, please start a new thread in nat west forum.

Advise reading up on this, you can send same CPR10 request back to cobbetts for full disclosure of how the banks arrive at their costs, but read up on it first.

On your new thread put on what you have done so far then peeps will be able to see and advise on your claim better as its all together.

 

Celicaman

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all ,

 

When I received the Part 18 request from Cobbetts, I just went ahead and replied in detail to Cobbetts and filed a copy with the court. Now I ahve received a judgement form the court allocating to fasttrack and also ordering me to answer the Part 18 within 14 days. Now My question is this: How many out there have actually been ordered by the judge to answer the Part 18 , even after sending Cobbetts our " bog standard" reply to their request?

It seems to me that we may be better off with either a more detailed claim from the beginning or just to answer the Part 18 as a matter of fact?

 

Any thoughts?

18/04/07 1st letter sent (again)

19/04/07 letter received by Stuart Higley

25/04/07 Usual blabla letter from NatWest "investigating and so on and so forth" received.

08/05/07 LBA sent

09/05/07 LBA received by Natwest

25/05/07 Claimed online by MCOL

Claim served on the 4th of June

Acknowledgment of service received 18th of June

Cobbets defense and Part 18 request received 05 July

Notice of Transfer of Proceedings received 06 July

19/07/07 Allocated to small claims track, refer back after 21 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Help!!

 

I have received the defence from NatWest this morning and similarly to some others, stated " This request is served pursuant to CPR Part 18 alternatively with regard to CPR Rule 27.2 (3). What does this mean? Should I send the letter that has been shown previously in this thread? I sent the court copies of the charges by post even though I registered my claim online, do you think this means that the charges weren't filed with my claim, or are Natwest stalling? I have been through the process to the letter using the templates, so Natwest have previously received 2 copies of my charges.

 

What's my next best step, I have until 22nd August to respond.

 

PS. I'm suprised that they have entered a defence since the latest ongoings with bank charges, is this a good sign or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gemhew,

 

Click on the link in my signature for Nat West Claimants and follow the advice re: CPR part 18 requests.

 

Also, start a new thread in the nat west forum so that we can keep track of your claim and support you along the way :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all ,

 

When I received the Part 18 request from Cobbetts, I just went ahead and replied in detail to Cobbetts and filed a copy with the court. Now I ahve received a judgement form the court allocating to fasttrack and also ordering me to answer the Part 18 within 14 days. Now My question is this: How many out there have actually been ordered by the judge to answer the Part 18 , even after sending Cobbetts our " bog standard" reply to their request?

It seems to me that we may be better off with either a more detailed claim from the beginning or just to answer the Part 18 as a matter of fact?

 

Any thoughts?

 

The Defence brought my CPR 18 non compliance to the attention of the judge at the first hearing, the judge then made an order which i complied with.

 

I think there's a new POC posted yesterday by Zootscoot that should keep the wolves at bay.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...