Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC - Compliance Check - Help...


hyper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4102 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

 

i have recevied a letter from hmrc stating they are reviewing my 'income tax position' and wish to do a 'compliance check' ('make sure customers are paying right amount of tax and receving right allowance & tax relief') as i am listed as director on 2 company's.

 

the 1st company was already un the process of closing and the 2nd only opened a few months ago. all company accounts are upto date have been submitted & all tax payments to them have been paid.

 

however the letter states they wish to update thier records and confirm source's of income for upto the last 3 or so years.

 

I have never come across these type of checks and not sure why they would be doing this & not sure if thier is anything to watch out for.

 

has anyone else been through this ? what should i do?

Edited by hyper
update
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not heard of this either. I don't think you have anything to worry about as long as you are honest with them.

HMRC are desperately trying to collect revenue these days and seem to be coming up with all kinds of new tricks to catch you out.

If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to worry about though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you'll be fine, although i'm not sure why they are targeting people that are registered with them. They should be starting to go through places like eBay & get in touch with the sellers on there that aren't registered with them. Like they do in USA, over there Paypal notifys their tax office when someone earns over a certain amount in sales. In my business I am not making enough yet to even pay tax, but there are numerous others been doing the same thing longer & fetching at least a couple of grand a month on there & not paying tax.

That does rile me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the supportive feedback guys.

 

here are one of the lines on the letter

 

'we are undertaking review of your income tax position because you are currently director of 2 business's and according to record you ceased employment in x year. so therefore to update my records and ensure they are accurate pls confirm source of income since that date'.

 

i understand this really, i have updated them already, so not sure why they are doing this, and wonder if they are trying to catch me out, even though thier is nothing to catch.

 

just annoying cos naturally you begin to get worried and i have always filed all my accounts and any monies owed to them in good time.

 

:-(

 

just a little stressted and annoyed with them at the moment. ruined my weekend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am afraid I can't give you the reason why you have been chosen for a review, but I can hazard a guess!

HMRC have many compliance projects on the go at the moment; one of them is directorships of close companies ( less than 5 directors and/or family run)

The reason for this project is that directors control the purse strings of the company and can manipulate those purse strings (not that I am for one second accusing you if this)

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, the OP is a director of a Ltd company.

Directors of Ltd Co. are classed as an employee of that company. The Ltd Co is a separate legal entity from the director.

Sole traders are in a different position. There us no separate legal entity from them.

If they go under they could end up losing everything.

The losses for a Ltd Co will be limited to the amounts that the directors put in to the company.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, the OP is a director of a Ltd company.

Directors of Ltd Co. are classed as an employee of that company. The Ltd Co is a separate legal entity from the director.

Sole traders are in a different position. There us no separate legal entity from them.

If they go under they could end up losing everything.

The losses for a Ltd Co will be limited to the amounts that the directors put in to the company.

 

hi,

 

thanks for your response

 

so what would this mean for me then ? in laymans terms pls ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am afraid I can't give you the reason why you have been chosen for a review, but I can hazard a guess!

HMRC have many compliance projects on the go at the moment; one of them is directorships of close companies ( less than 5 directors and/or family run)

The reason for this project is that directors control the purse strings of the company and can manipulate those purse strings (not that I am for one second accusing you if this)

 

Hi,

 

thanks for taking time to respond.

 

ok - but i have submitted all accounts for the business...and they would have access or able to obtain this information? or not? (i.e they already aware of the account information about the company, but want me to confirm it to them directly?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, although you are an employee (because you are a director of a Ltd Co) you are in a unique position, unlike ordinary employees, whereby you are in a position to manipulate payments to the company such as a directors loan account, goodwill payments etc

Payments such as these may constitute wages but may not always have tax/NI deducted.

This is what HMRC are interested in; the question they ask themselves is this, is the payment a reward for services past, present or future and if they are then tax and NI should be deducted

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your second question, it is possible that some of the expenses/deductions might appear (to HMRC) to be non business related and they want to check to make sure.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I see what your saying, I spoke to the accoutant earlier as they are more in tune with this, so have got a appointment with them and will go through this. all the expense side of things are all backed up with the paper work, so if this is all this is about then it should be fine...I just hope they havent changed a rule and they are trying to catch me out on it.

 

thanks for your feedback guys. :-0)

 

In answer to your second question, it is possible that some of the expenses/deductions might appear (to HMRC) to be non business related and they want to check to make sure.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes these checks are just random and mandatory so don't stress too much.

Im sure your accountant will go over everything at the meeting so if there are any issues he/she will be able to advise you on them.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes these checks are just random and mandatory so don't stress too much.

Im sure your accountant will go over everything at the meeting so if there are any issues he/she will be able to advise you on them.

 

Thanks very much Gbarbm you have been very helpful !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hello again,

 

a little update so far,

 

I spoke to the accountant and they simply stated figures will need to be provided to the Tax Compliance team over the periods they have requested, this was confirmed and supplied to the Tax Compliance team.

 

A few weeks later, I received a response back from the Tax Compliance Team & they are now requesting

 

- actual amounts received for those periods

- employers reference

- bank statements for those periods

 

and they also state

 

'director will typically receive benefits in kind' ....

 

I am not sure if thier is some hidden agenda here at all....and what do they mean by employers ref & what a cheeky comment they made 'director will typically receive benefits in kind' thats a little out of order I thought....at the end of the day I am just a 1 man team & feel they are un-necessarily stressing me out.

 

im just putting together my bank statements...is their anything I should be weary about at all

& has anyone else gone through this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just supply the information they've asked for.

Make sure that all the items are business related and that you have receipts/invoices to back them up.

If you have put private items through the business then they should have been reimbursed; if that's not the case, then all you would need to do would be to disclose that to HMRC and pay the duties thereon.

I agree, the wording is a bit cheeky, there's no need for them to say it quite frankly!

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi

 

Can I have any update on your situation regarding the compliance check please....??

one of my friends received compliance check. We are not sure why this is sent to him as he does not own a company not he is a PAYE or contractor. He is on permanent role at a company and only earns one salary and no other household income. He pays tax promptly which is looked after by the employer who pays his salary. Donno why he was chosen for the complaince check as I assume the compliance checks are done for self-employed or a business.

 

your experiences and inputs will be of great help.

 

Thanks in anticipations

 

hi,

 

i have recevied a letter from hmrc stating they are reviewing my 'income tax position' and wish to do a 'compliance check' ('make sure customers are paying right amount of tax and receving right allowance & tax relief') as i am listed as director on 2 company's.

 

the 1st company was already un the process of closing and the 2nd only opened a few months ago. all company accounts are upto date have been submitted & all tax payments to them have been paid.

 

however the letter states they wish to update thier records and confirm source's of income for upto the last 3 or so years.

 

I have never come across these type of checks and not sure why they would be doing this & not sure if thier is anything to watch out for.

 

has anyone else been through this ? what should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...