Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As one of you mentioned above I've been in a mess for nearly 20 years now and I'm ready to sort my credit report out now - the main reason I got into second round of debt is my kids being unwell and the state considering them not unwell enough for extra help so despite my son being in hospital for 3 months in one year we got extra zero help and I eventually lost my job and got into debt to just so I can be تا my sons hospital bed at his time of need - my life basically fell apart and all these debts got me again 
    • Gosh mate I've woke up this morning with half the worry I had last night when going to sleep!.  I can't believe how much this forum has helped me over the years and I don't  have the words to explain the gratitude I feel towards you guys -  Now that I've slept on it I feel ready to reject this company and my plan is to make them an offer to accept payments to date as full and final settlement - I will I think write them a letter once my review is completed or maybe just send it now whilst they are reviewing explaining my kids are unwell for which reason I'm struggling to survive and if I can politely request for them to accept payment to date as a full and final - I'll mention I don't have any cash or anyone to borrow from to offer a full or even part amount of the remaining balance of the iva and therfore am unable to make a offer of payment.   If they agree to at least even put my offer to the creditors then I feel it's better I hang in there and that way I won't have to deal with any possibilities of more defaults and ccjs    Right now the only adverse effects on my credit report are the iva that is now 3 years old and 2 Ccj one coming of this July and one thus October.    But I am worried new action will begin and new defaults and Ccj may start to appear because I've paying into an agreement im under the impression the 6 year rules starts again so yes I have lost of mixed feelings about this but I'm not going to lie you guys have put some life back into my breath this week as for the last 3 years I've felt caged like an animal and this morning I feel freer I can't explain how much but certainly my soul feel lighter today thanks to yin because I'm now viewing this review totally different to I do yesterday thanks to you guys 
    • Court name UNKNOWN Case number ********** Amount N/A Confirmed by Insolvency Service Date issued May 2021 Type Voluntary Arrangement Notes If you have questions about voluntary arrangements you should speak to the Insolvency Service.     I started this in 2021. So it's been about 3 years I've been paying. 
    • Thanks @lookinforinfo@Nicky Boyi sent across the agreement earlier in this thread. No mention of financial reward to the MA. But, I wouldn't be surprised if it was done on the sly. As I said earlier, the owner of OPS is a convicted criminal, with a very shady reputation around these parts.
    • The average high street easy-access account pays 1.7% interest - but savers could earn 5% if they moved their money elsewhere. We look at which banks have the top rates.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC - Compliance Check - Help...


hyper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4102 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

 

i have recevied a letter from hmrc stating they are reviewing my 'income tax position' and wish to do a 'compliance check' ('make sure customers are paying right amount of tax and receving right allowance & tax relief') as i am listed as director on 2 company's.

 

the 1st company was already un the process of closing and the 2nd only opened a few months ago. all company accounts are upto date have been submitted & all tax payments to them have been paid.

 

however the letter states they wish to update thier records and confirm source's of income for upto the last 3 or so years.

 

I have never come across these type of checks and not sure why they would be doing this & not sure if thier is anything to watch out for.

 

has anyone else been through this ? what should i do?

Edited by hyper
update
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not heard of this either. I don't think you have anything to worry about as long as you are honest with them.

HMRC are desperately trying to collect revenue these days and seem to be coming up with all kinds of new tricks to catch you out.

If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to worry about though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you'll be fine, although i'm not sure why they are targeting people that are registered with them. They should be starting to go through places like eBay & get in touch with the sellers on there that aren't registered with them. Like they do in USA, over there Paypal notifys their tax office when someone earns over a certain amount in sales. In my business I am not making enough yet to even pay tax, but there are numerous others been doing the same thing longer & fetching at least a couple of grand a month on there & not paying tax.

That does rile me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the supportive feedback guys.

 

here are one of the lines on the letter

 

'we are undertaking review of your income tax position because you are currently director of 2 business's and according to record you ceased employment in x year. so therefore to update my records and ensure they are accurate pls confirm source of income since that date'.

 

i understand this really, i have updated them already, so not sure why they are doing this, and wonder if they are trying to catch me out, even though thier is nothing to catch.

 

just annoying cos naturally you begin to get worried and i have always filed all my accounts and any monies owed to them in good time.

 

:-(

 

just a little stressted and annoyed with them at the moment. ruined my weekend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am afraid I can't give you the reason why you have been chosen for a review, but I can hazard a guess!

HMRC have many compliance projects on the go at the moment; one of them is directorships of close companies ( less than 5 directors and/or family run)

The reason for this project is that directors control the purse strings of the company and can manipulate those purse strings (not that I am for one second accusing you if this)

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, the OP is a director of a Ltd company.

Directors of Ltd Co. are classed as an employee of that company. The Ltd Co is a separate legal entity from the director.

Sole traders are in a different position. There us no separate legal entity from them.

If they go under they could end up losing everything.

The losses for a Ltd Co will be limited to the amounts that the directors put in to the company.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, the OP is a director of a Ltd company.

Directors of Ltd Co. are classed as an employee of that company. The Ltd Co is a separate legal entity from the director.

Sole traders are in a different position. There us no separate legal entity from them.

If they go under they could end up losing everything.

The losses for a Ltd Co will be limited to the amounts that the directors put in to the company.

 

hi,

 

thanks for your response

 

so what would this mean for me then ? in laymans terms pls ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am afraid I can't give you the reason why you have been chosen for a review, but I can hazard a guess!

HMRC have many compliance projects on the go at the moment; one of them is directorships of close companies ( less than 5 directors and/or family run)

The reason for this project is that directors control the purse strings of the company and can manipulate those purse strings (not that I am for one second accusing you if this)

 

Hi,

 

thanks for taking time to respond.

 

ok - but i have submitted all accounts for the business...and they would have access or able to obtain this information? or not? (i.e they already aware of the account information about the company, but want me to confirm it to them directly?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, although you are an employee (because you are a director of a Ltd Co) you are in a unique position, unlike ordinary employees, whereby you are in a position to manipulate payments to the company such as a directors loan account, goodwill payments etc

Payments such as these may constitute wages but may not always have tax/NI deducted.

This is what HMRC are interested in; the question they ask themselves is this, is the payment a reward for services past, present or future and if they are then tax and NI should be deducted

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to your second question, it is possible that some of the expenses/deductions might appear (to HMRC) to be non business related and they want to check to make sure.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I see what your saying, I spoke to the accoutant earlier as they are more in tune with this, so have got a appointment with them and will go through this. all the expense side of things are all backed up with the paper work, so if this is all this is about then it should be fine...I just hope they havent changed a rule and they are trying to catch me out on it.

 

thanks for your feedback guys. :-0)

 

In answer to your second question, it is possible that some of the expenses/deductions might appear (to HMRC) to be non business related and they want to check to make sure.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes these checks are just random and mandatory so don't stress too much.

Im sure your accountant will go over everything at the meeting so if there are any issues he/she will be able to advise you on them.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes these checks are just random and mandatory so don't stress too much.

Im sure your accountant will go over everything at the meeting so if there are any issues he/she will be able to advise you on them.

 

Thanks very much Gbarbm you have been very helpful !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hello again,

 

a little update so far,

 

I spoke to the accountant and they simply stated figures will need to be provided to the Tax Compliance team over the periods they have requested, this was confirmed and supplied to the Tax Compliance team.

 

A few weeks later, I received a response back from the Tax Compliance Team & they are now requesting

 

- actual amounts received for those periods

- employers reference

- bank statements for those periods

 

and they also state

 

'director will typically receive benefits in kind' ....

 

I am not sure if thier is some hidden agenda here at all....and what do they mean by employers ref & what a cheeky comment they made 'director will typically receive benefits in kind' thats a little out of order I thought....at the end of the day I am just a 1 man team & feel they are un-necessarily stressing me out.

 

im just putting together my bank statements...is their anything I should be weary about at all

& has anyone else gone through this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just supply the information they've asked for.

Make sure that all the items are business related and that you have receipts/invoices to back them up.

If you have put private items through the business then they should have been reimbursed; if that's not the case, then all you would need to do would be to disclose that to HMRC and pay the duties thereon.

I agree, the wording is a bit cheeky, there's no need for them to say it quite frankly!

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi

 

Can I have any update on your situation regarding the compliance check please....??

one of my friends received compliance check. We are not sure why this is sent to him as he does not own a company not he is a PAYE or contractor. He is on permanent role at a company and only earns one salary and no other household income. He pays tax promptly which is looked after by the employer who pays his salary. Donno why he was chosen for the complaince check as I assume the compliance checks are done for self-employed or a business.

 

your experiences and inputs will be of great help.

 

Thanks in anticipations

 

hi,

 

i have recevied a letter from hmrc stating they are reviewing my 'income tax position' and wish to do a 'compliance check' ('make sure customers are paying right amount of tax and receving right allowance & tax relief') as i am listed as director on 2 company's.

 

the 1st company was already un the process of closing and the 2nd only opened a few months ago. all company accounts are upto date have been submitted & all tax payments to them have been paid.

 

however the letter states they wish to update thier records and confirm source's of income for upto the last 3 or so years.

 

I have never come across these type of checks and not sure why they would be doing this & not sure if thier is anything to watch out for.

 

has anyone else been through this ? what should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...