Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Trust Deeds Scotland - utter pests!!


exRAF
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had these idiots bombard them with phone calls?

 

They are based in Glasgow and call themselves Trust Deed Scotland.

 

They call and ask to speak to me, I don't confirm my name and simply ask who they are and what they want.

 

I normally get some cock and bull about "new money legislation" at which point I cut their narrative short and ask for my number to be removed from their system.

 

However they can be pretty aggressive and try to get me to confirm my name etc.

 

My thoughts are they are either a DCA trying it on, or are just plain stupid.

 

Can I complain to anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

133 Finnieston Street, Glasgow, G3 8HB

Registered in Scotland: SC369406

Data Protection Registration: PZ2205958

Consumer Credit Licence : 637870

 

They do have a web page, use their name all in one word + .net Apparently they are a debt advice company that will arrange trust deeds but no doubt at a price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name & Registered Office:

KELSOM LTD

133 FINNIESTON STREET

GLASGOW

G3 8HB

Company No. SC369406

 

 

 

 

Status: Active

Date of Incorporation: 01/12/2009

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC):

82990 - Other business support service activities not elsewhere classified

Accounting Reference Date: 31/03

Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/03/2011 (TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)

Next Accounts Due: 31/12/2012

Last Return Made Up To: 01/12/2011

Next Return Due: 29/12/2012

 

http://companycheck.co.uk/company/SC369406

 

Current Directors

Mr Jon Paul Kelly

Mr Mark John Sommerville

Link to post
Share on other sites

These compamies are becoming desparate to muster up businness, there is new legislation on the way in Scotland in the next couple of years, which will almost certainly make Trust Deeds a thing of the past. People who are in a position to make monthly contributions towards their debts will be directed to DAS as an alternative (Hence the current advertising campaigne). DAS unlike Trust Deeds can be accessed free of charge through the charity sector and protects assets, therefore the gravy train will grind to a halt.

Edited by Crocdoc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone had these idiots bombard them with phone calls?

 

They are based in Glasgow and call themselves Trust Deed Scotland.

 

They call and ask to speak to me, I don't confirm my name and simply ask who they are and what they want.

 

I normally get some cock and bull about "new money legislation" at which point I cut their narrative short and ask for my number to be removed from their system.

 

However they can be pretty aggressive and try to get me to confirm my name etc.

 

My thoughts are they are either a DCA trying it on, or are just plain stupid.

 

Can I complain to anyone?

 

 

dont touch them with a bargepole!!

 

are you on TPS that should stop them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking time out to reply guys. I've no intention on using their 'services' rather I was curious if they were a DCA using tactics....... Seems they are just telephone vultures preying on people. Sadly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

These idiots will not stop calling me. Here's an example:

 

"Hello"

 

TD - "Hello can I speak to Mr x please"

 

"May I ask who's calling"

 

TD - "Mr X it's Trust Deed Scotland"

 

Now it's clear at this point they think they're speaking to me, despite me not confirming this. They then become argumentative if I tell them I'm not interested in what they have to say. They also fail to acknowledge that I have not confirmed my identity, yet they continue to call me by my Christian name. I am royally fed up of them. I owe them nothing and have no desire to use their services, yet they're hell bent on calling me for an argument!

 

Today I just said hang on after answering then sat the phone down for five mins before ending the call. I think I'll invest in a whistle next......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I came here wondering about the same thing. I had a phone call from them and they were really annoying, wouldn't take no for an answer. Apparently they do charge.

 

If I remember correctly it was slightly different than a DAS also, not too sure of all the legality of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ex RAF-the old methods usually work best. First have a loud whistle beside the phone and blow it hard at them when they phone. Then

replace the receiver without speaking to them. Do not speak to them ever again once they have identified themselves. Never get drawn

into an argument just blow the whistle and put the phone down.

Even the dumbest will get the picture and try someone else-if only to give their ears a rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yes, it would be obviously better if one could use the sound of a mark 2 Victor with full afterburners blasting down the phone at them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

but in the absence of that perhaps a Snowdrop could lend one of their whistles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

or better still do not hang up but do put the phone to one side (or under a pillow) and carry on with other things and let them waste their money. one added bonus of this is that they will be furious at this because you will be wasting their time rather than them wasting yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi, I have a question regarding Trust Deed Scotland debt text messages.

 

I dont ever remember signing up to a list to receive these other than when I used a credit scoring agency last week to see my current score. Message states:

 

Got debt problems over £10k? Trust Deed Scotland can help you write them off using government legislation. To become debt free reply HELP. Calls may be recorded.

 

Is this a [problem], should I ignore it? I have a couple of issues with debts and do not feel I want to go down this road which seems to be some kind of bankruptcy. Also I really dont want anyone to accidently see my problems in a text message - should I call trust deed scotland to ask them to remove me from the list or is it better to ignore the text message?

 

Any good links for where I get good debt advice in Scotland?

 

TY

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...