Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Many thanks for your response. You are correct it is Royal Barn Road that is stated on the PCN.  Where i was was Royle Road. I originally came from the Tesco side, was initially parked across the road where there are parking bays, then moved over to side where the double yellows are.  I did check the entire street from Tescos on, and there are no signs for restrictions at all. Also, the friend who owns the house asked the building company sales office today, who also believe the double yellows are old (some of them turn into peoples drives), and said there should be none.  - Obviously if the council have them as current thats besides the point. SO the big question is, given the PCN states very incorrect information, Location, and type of contravention, can it be challenged? Thanks
    • Please see below for the Witness Statement from UKPC received in the post on Friday, 3 May.  The letter is dated 1 May 2024. I am also including Exhibits 1, 2 and 3.   The remaining exhibits relate to the PCN's and other correspondence already posted on this thread.   The most glaring mistake for me is in Exhibit 2 (UKPC's OWN copy of their signage), NOT SHOWING that parking is not allowed between 22:00 and 08:00.  Note that this restriction IS showing on the draft sign approved in the contract between UKPC and their client.   Also, the site plan in Exhibit 1 shows signs against the wall of the building (depicted by a "W"); whereas the picture in my witness statement clearly shows no signs visible on that particular wall.   I look forward to hearing everyone's feedback on this! UKPC WS.pdf Below are the Exhibits UKPC EXHIBIT 3.pdf UKPC EXHIBIT 2.pdf UKPC EXHIBIT 1.pdf
    • Street did his best by removing any trace of the Tories from his campaign literature, as you say it's a shame for him. I see Sunak is clutching at the only poll that shows the Tories in not too bad a light, the hung Parliament one. The boss of Ipsos and Sir John Curtice have both said it's flawed. 'Sir John Curtice, the polling expert, also projected the Conservatives nine points behind in the national vote share but advised against using this ­data to estimate Westminster seats. He told BBC Radio 4’s Today ­programme: “It’s quite long been the case, certainly since the late 1980s, that the way that people vote in local elections doesn’t necessarily exactly mirror the way that they would vote in a general election.” '
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

B&S DCA chasing old HB 'debt' already been to a court - given a conditional discharge.


netsniper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi no he isn't telling anyone and I will take you advice so thank you.

 

Never a good idea to pass on or sell a phone with the original sim card for just this reason.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update,

I was contacted by B&S who asked me to make some proposals to pay this debt off,

I have been to the CAB but they weren't that helpful and told me to contact them with an offer of £1.00 per week which I did ,

 

I also sent along a budget sheet that I created myself showing them that I only have £9.00 per month left from my benefits as I am already paying them back at a rate of £40.00 per month for council tax that I owe which is being deducted by the DWP.

 

The reply I got from B&S is below which is clearly asking for a figure I just can not pay and with further threats,

as you can see below I don't have much time to reply.

Can anyone please give me some advice.

 

Thank you

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

With reference to the above

we write to advise that your proposals for payment are unacceptable.

 

We would however be prepared to accept payment as follows:

 

£3.55 required by the 31ST May 2012 followed by 11 payments of £3.55 per week

 

Documentary evidence of your benefits must have been received in our offices by the time the above arrangement expires.

 

Please note the above arrangement will not clear your total outstanding balance. This is a temporary agreement only.

 

If you fail to make payment of any of the instalments detailed above, or to supply the documentary evidence requested, the agreement will be cancelled and the full sum will become due and payable.

 

Further action will then be taken for the recovery of the balance outstanding.

If necessary, proceedings will be instigated which may result in the grant of a County Court Judgement.

This will severely affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

What a load of baloney, your benefits are for you to live on not to pay non priority debts.

 

May I suggest the following.

 

Same addressee as before.

 

Ref:XXXXXXXX

 

Dear Curr or Madman,

 

I refer to your letter regarding the level of payment you ''require'' for this debt.

 

You should be aware that it is I who decides what I can afford to pay towards non priority debts such as this.

 

Your threats of ''Further Action'' have little impact and are of no interest to me,

as you will no doubt know should you decide to escalate this matter to court action the most likely conclusion would be that a judge would award £1.00 per month because of my financial status and dependence on benefits.

 

I am however prepared to be generous and pay £1.00 per week by standing order.

 

I further suggest that if you do not have sufficient authority to comply with this, please refer it to someone who does.:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a reply from them today at 8.15 am after they called on the phone which I didn't answer.

 

Dear Sir,

 

FINAL OPPORTUNITY

 

Re: Sundry Debt

 

Council Reference: ********

 

Despite our previous requests for payment of the above account, the sum of £14,394.44 remains unpaid.

It is our intention to return this case to our Client, who may now instigate County Court proceedings.

If the Court grants a Judgement against you then there will be significant consequences:

oYou will Incur Court Fees

oYou will have to Pay Interest on your Debt

oYou will have to Pay Solicitors Costs awarded by the Court

oThe Judgement will show up on any Credit Checks against you and will adversely affect your Credit Rating

 

The Court can also make you Bankrupt, meaning that you will no longer control your assets, which the Official Receiver or Trustee may sell to pay the debt and costs, for example –

oIf you own your own home it may be sold

oYour life assurance policies may be taken and disposed of

oAn order may be granted to take part of your wages for up to 3 years

oIf you are self employed, your business could be closed down and any employees dismissed

oYour credit rating will be adversely affected

 

In order to avoid this action you must pay this debt in full within 7 days.

 

Payment must be made direct to ourselves at the above address (not to the Council) in cash, postal orders, bankers draft, or cheque – please ensure that you quote your reference number with all payments and correspondence.

Payment can also be made by CREDIT or DEBIT CARD by telephoning our office on the above number or on the internet at www.bristowsutor.co.uk (Note: All card payments are subject to a small percentage charge).

 

If you are unable to pay the full amount within 7 days, you should IMMEDIATELY contact our office –

Call us on: 0871 677 0070

Text us on: 07781 488 270

Fax us on: 0871 677 0072

Visit us at: www.bristowsutor.co.uk

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Bristow & Sutor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the drafted letter anyway.

IF the OC gets back to you send

the same letter to them.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep that one, didn't know if you had sent it yet.

 

The OC may contact you, but more likely they'll farm it out to another DCA.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just an update

it's been a while now now since I had any correspondence from the council until

 

 

a few days back they asked for a budget sheet which I have sent them and waiting for their reply.

 

 

Today I have received a letter from the DWP who also asked me for a budget sheet 2 weeks ago which I sent them which showed I had a surplus of £8.00 a week,

 

 

the letter I received today is telling me that they are going to take £ 17.75 from me every week

which I just can not afford so what do I do now?

 

 

the money they will be taking is for an overpayment as mentioned at the start of this post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any non priority debts showing on the budget sheet...eg mobile phone contracts, credit cards etc...they will expect you to drop the repayments to them. If you do not have any non priority debts and the budget sheet puts you on the threshold of hardship to survive, then you need to contact them and tell them this and appeal their decision.

 

WD

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any non priority debts showing on the budget sheet...eg mobile phone contracts, credit cards etc...they will expect you to drop the repayments to them. If you do not have any non priority debts and the budget sheet puts you on the threshold of hardship to survive, then you need to contact them and tell them this and appeal their decision.

 

WD

 

Thank you for you advice.

 

Agreed, send an appeal to the manager of the DWP Debt Management Office..

 

Thank you again for you help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'll review the whole thread and info recd.and get back to you asap. prob tomorrow pm.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi having read through the thread

I must agree that a deduction based on the cost of your obviously essential mobile phone is unfair and unreasonable,

if the department will not acceed to this then imo an appeal to the Tribunal Service is warranted.

 

So, a formal complaint to the Manager at the office dealing with this,

your budget sheet clearly shows that you would be placed in hardship if such deductions are made,

 

 

lay it all out in a concise form and give explicit reasons to justify the phone contract for emergency use.

 

Notify the department that if they go ahead you wish to enter an appeal immediately.

[note for info only: I have seen Netsnipers I&E by pm as it contains personal data).

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...