Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dwp medical - ** WON **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3979 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I have written back to the tribunal service, asking for statement of reason. (My tribunal gave me 18 points) I have supplied further evidence of serious errors at my ATOS Medical and complained that my tribunal missed vital evidence from that Medical. Asking tribunal for a fresh decision. I, have now complained to my MP and asking him to investigate further for me. I let the DWP know via letter. Will just see what happens. Getting very down with the whole process now. Still think that in the end the job centre awaits me. Will give it one last push to highlight their mistakes. Feel like I am the one in the dock all the time as so to spreak. I do believe the DWP are just wearing people down until they finally give in. In any case,if you heard the news, all benefits are being scrapped soon to be replaced by the universal benefit. I have contacted my local radio station, as they are interested in mental health matters and whats happening at the moment with the benefits. Its ok, it will not go out on air. I, do feel like contacting a national newspaper. But thats just pie in the sky.

Best wishes to you all

Edited by grahamdavid31
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

:Hiya grahamdavid31:

 

You've asked for the full statement of reasons. So far so good. Unfortunately, you can't just ask the Tribunals Service for a fresh decision. You have to make a formal application to the first tier tribunal for leave to appeal to the upper tribunal.

 

If, having read the full statement of reasons, you want to continue to the upper tier you'll need; specialist advice from an experienced benefits advisor or welfare rights solicitor and nerves of steel.

 

Good luck, whatever you decide, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought I'd also mention being in the WRAG group doesn't mean you'll automatically be forced into applying for work. Some people have their WFI interviews done over the phone as the advisor can see they're not fit or ready for them at the first meeting. Many people are in the WRAG group and their experience isn't always negative. To try to put it into proportion remember people tend to post on forums for advice where they encounter a problem, we don't tend to get posts where someone is in the WRAG group and finds it ok.

 

Only people with a prognosis of less than 3 months I think usually start being 'pushed' towards some job seeking tasks like doing a CV. The other times where it has occasionally happened is usually due to lack of experience/knowledge on the WFI advisors part, which can be put right.

 

Try not to worry or stress too much and also wish you good luck with wahtever you decide to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a wrag interview yesterday at the jc and the lady took one look at me and said "i will phone you in 12 months time, I will never be able to work with you to get you in work" and you really should be in the support group" after ten minutes the interview was over after she had finished typing...not the ordeal i was dreading.. She wished me well and was very polite...

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are in the same situation, I said that they are turning people away, because they are too ill. That is brilliant news though, pleased for you. They have a hard job to do, and sometimes they understand and they are stuck in the middle of all this nonsense.....

LilythePink

If you liked what I said, and if it helped in any way, please tip my scales..... thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

She also said she had never met anyone who had scored 36 points and was in wrag...She also said if you need any help whatsoever with anything that i should phone her and she would try and sort it..I jokingly asked her to attend my tribunal with me..her answer was "i wish"...restored my faith a little..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes..i have cab helping me..i have also had dla cut to lc/lm from hc/lm but was refused dla at first then they changed just days before tribunal...resubmitting for dla after six months..I have big neuro problems and need another op..my tenth.. Awaiting a emergency appointment with a neuro after a recent scan..Such is life..

Link to post
Share on other sites

This government is truly the worst we have ever had, and they are wasting money, instead of trying to get people jobs, that can work. Good to hear that you are getting somewhere with it all. I am still on a waiting list since May for counselling, so am very frustrated, and no money to pay the mortgage....

This forum is the best forum I have seen, and continually use it for advice....

LilythePink

If you liked what I said, and if it helped in any way, please tip my scales..... thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

After wining my tribunal (18 points) Work group. I have written to the tribunal service for statement of reason and asked for another hearing.

The Job Centre have written to me and are aware of another appeal coming up.

My main reason for complaining since tribunal is the reason that the ATOS doctor missed alot of my health conditons and that reflected at my tribunal.

I have my MP involved, and he has also written to the tribunal service for reasons why my health conditions were missed.

Best wishes to you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is where we are at at the moment on 29th Aug had ATOS medical got 39 points dr basically said what are you doing here, next day had DLA tribunal panel said you have no problems, so we are waiting for statement of reasons to see if there is an error of law to take to the upper tier. Have a benefit welfare advisor helping us we are just deciding whether to apply again as been told about the 6 month rule any future claims are knocked back in the 6 months after tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I,wish you well. Very serious that the ATOS Doctor gave you 39 points and the tribunal nil. Go luck waiting for for statement of reasons. I have involved my MP, who has written to the tribunal service on my behalf. Will just have to wait and see like you.

In the long run, I may well make a fresh claim again for ESA after six months, if things do not work out.

Best wishes Graham

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for the replies sorry did not make myself clear the DLA tribunal were horrid said with all my aids I can do what eveytone else can which is not true still need all the help just not so much lifting for my wife. We have got the MP involved also, told today tribunal have asked the judge twice for the statement of reasons but not arrived yet tribunal said they will give her until Wednesday, then they will ask judges boss. Just out of interest is 39 a high score for ATOS medical or is that average. Thanks in advance for any replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would keep in contact with your MP and give him/her as much information as possible, if they have contacted the tribunal service on your behalf.

I think 39 points for ATOS medical is quite good. I,would keep in contact with the tribunal service yourself to see how things are coming along. I have found them quite helpful on the phone. My MP has contacted the tribunal serivce on my behalf, but warns me that it could be at least six weeks before he expects a reply. My best wishes to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply got the statements of reasons today have not attempted to read it yet. Seeing benefit caseworker on the 8th October to discus this and whether to put in a fresh claim, will be seeing the MP on the 19th all go isn't it my best wishes to you too we can only hope we both have a positive outcome. Ill keep you all informed of progress.

ps I have always found the Tribunal Service helpful, just not the panel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Update....

 

Just had a scathing tribunal ruling....They decided before we went in and the papers allowing the appeal were on the desk when we sat down...

They did not hold back and have noted their dissatisfaction with the dwp for letting the case get near them..36 points awarded and put in wrag after assessment.

Appealed for support group and many doctors from top neurological hospital wrote letters of support which were given on assessment and copied to DM...

Had a proper judge and a doctor who knew much as after they announced the decision the doctor asked about condition and its progress and congratulated me on providing some very good reports which they found helpful..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...