Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you!    It was bought on my debit card    
    • Hi. Welcome to CAG. How was the car purchased?  
    • Absolutely for the agreement they are referring to.... puts them on notice that this is going to be a uphill fight.   Andy 
    • Particular's of claim for reference only 1. the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account (16 digits) 2. The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. 3. The debt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  4. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Suggested defence 1. The Defendant contends the particulars of the claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.3 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. The claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre action protocol) failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st of October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant 7.1 PAPDC. 3. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification. 4. Paragraph 2 is denied. I have not been served with a default notice pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974. 5. Paragraph 3 is denied. i am unaware of any legal assignment or notice of assignment. A copy of assignment was sent by Overdales solicitors when acknowledgement of receipt of CPR request was received, but this was not the original.   6. Paragraph 4 is denied. Neither the original creditor or the assignee have served notice pursuant to sec86c of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 Notice of Sums in Arrears and therefore prevented from charging interest on debt regulated by the CCA1974. 7. The defendant submitted a request for a copy of the alleged agreement pursuant to s78 CCA 1974. The claimant has acknowledged receipt of request but has failed to comply. The claimant has failed to provide any evidence of balance or Default Notice requested by CPR 31.14 8. It is therefore denied with regards to defendant owing any monies to the claimant. therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to:  a.  Show how the defendant has entered into an agreement with HSBC. b.  Show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a Default notice pursuant to section 87 (1) CCA 1974. c.  Show and quantify how the defendant has reached the amount claimed for. d.  Show how the claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity  to issue a claim. 8.  As per civil procedure rule 16.5 (4) it is expected claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 9.  Until such time the claimant can comply to a section 78 request he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement 10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.     .
    • OK, well rereading the court orders from March, in the cold light of day rather than when knackered late at night, it is quite clear that on 25 June there will only be a preliminary hearing about Laura representing her son.  Nothing more. It's lazy DCBL who haven't read things properly and have stupidly sent their Witness Statement early. Laura & I had already been working on a WS, and here it is.  It needs tweaking now after reading the rubbish that DCBL sent and after all of LFI's comments.  But the "meat" is there. Defendant's WS - version 1.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit debt collectors re old Visa Associates loan, now Citi-financial


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Letter to the Compliance Manager 1ST Credit.

 

Ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I refer to your letter dated xx xx xxxx in which you atempt to refute my claim that the alleged debt for £xxxx is statute barred because you received a letter from me dated xx xx xxxx, I do not acknowledge any debt to 1ST Credit as my letter was sent only in regard to a DISPUTE on the alleged debt which had NOT been rectified by the original creditor.

 

I therefore contend that my letter does not constitute an admission of liability as laid down in the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2011 Appendix B,

at B7. The Guidance states: A relevant acknowledgment will normally be made by performance of the debtor (or his representative). For example making payments,or by making An unequivocal written admission that the obligation still subsists.

This quite obviously is not the case here.

 

You also allege that a payment was made by me on xx xx xxxxx to a third party namely xxxxxxxxxxxxx, I categorically deny that I made any such payment thence your claim is refuted.

 

1ST Credit must produce irrefutable proof that any such payment was made, as I have no knowledge of the company you claim the payment was allegedly made to.

 

If a card payment was made you must supply the following details:

1. The name on the face of the card.

2. The name of the card issuer.

3. The 16 digit card number and the 3 digit security code.

4 The expiry date of the card.

5. The date (exact) of the alleged payment.

6.The amount of the alleged payment.

If a cheque payment was made:

1. The name of the bank the cheque was drawn on.

2. The Cheque number and account number shown on the face of the cheque.

3. The name of the drawer.

4. The date on the face of the cheque

5. The amount allegedly paid.

For all other payment types the details as laid out must be provided.

 

Unless this information is provided I cannot enter into any further correspondence on this matter, having

now researched 1ST Credit quite thoroughly given the unenviable reputation I find for your company I must

insist on the proofs laid out above.

 

For clarification I have not admitted any liability for the alleged debt and I have not at anytime made any payment

to any other debt collection agency.

 

I expect your reply within 7 days.

 

Send recorded delivery to The Compliance Manager ( marked CONFIDENTIAL).

 

Good Luck.

 

Just made a few corrections :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a standard reply from 1st crud saying they've passed the cca request to citi to be fulfilled. They say the account is on hold until such time as they send the documents to me.

 

I'm a little confused now. I received a notice of assignment from 1st crud sometime ago, yet they are going back to citi for the documents. Going through some of the other paperwork received from them they say they purchased they debt in 2006?? I just seems like bull all the way through.

 

With a CCA request, what would be they next likely steps on the basis of :-

 

1. No agreement

2. Recon agreement

Or

3. The original agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

the next likely step will be they wil sell it on a phishign list

 

or

 

sen a discount letter.

 

= BEGGING LETTER , you've found us out.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With Citi and 1st crud more likely a recon. + a stetement.

 

These debts are sold with the absolute minimum of details.

For clarification please when was the last payment or written acknowledgment made?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

last payment was april 2005 and no written acknowledgement to date, the letter you drafted for me brig rebutted thier claims of acknowledgment.

 

Althouh they have written to me acknowedging my letter and passing it to citi and also confirming the account is on hold do I still send the failed to comply letter after the 17th septemeber (that will be 12 + 2 working days)?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the account showing on your credit files?

 

Because if your last post is accurate no payment or acknowledgment since April 2005 this debt is statute barred, so send the following by recorded delivery to 1ST Credit addressed to the Compliance Manager.

 

Ref: as on their letters.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Formal Notice.

 

I refer to the debt for £xxxx Which 1ST Credit allege is owed by me, please take note I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or any company you may claim to represent.

 

I have now taken advice on this matter and have researched my credit history and have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred, given this information I will not now or at any time inthe future make any payment or offer of payment regarding this alleged debt.

 

You will now cease to process and store all date relating to me with immediate effect.

 

I am fully aware of the Limitations Act 1980 and the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2011 and specifically the sections regarding the pursuit of statute barred debts.

 

I now consider this matter closed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...