Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So sorry it's took me a few weeks to respond back to you. Thank you so much for your response. My grandfather is clear about the pension deductions on his pay slips.  As I mention before all these went missing in the burgarly. We have tried Willis Tower Watson but they were not to helpful. I am stuck what we can try next. Thank you again.     
    • As a rough guess it would be your landlord who would be responsible. But you need to understand the extent of your losses before you can begin any claim. This means that you need to list out any expenses to which you have been put, any expenses which would be associated with repairing damage or cleaning et cetera. And then list out the inconvenience to which you have been put as a result of this. Any actual expenses – money loss which has been incurred already all that is likely to be incurred in result of repairs will need an inspection and to quotations which eventually you will present to the landlord. Even if I'm wrong and it is not the landlord – you will still need the evidence that I have listed above in order to begin any claim.  
    • Hi, I have been renting a three bedroom, top floor flat for six years now in England. Just so you know, there is a letting agent, landlord and a block management company involved. Eighteen months ago we had a considerable leak in one of the bedrooms, affecting the next door bedroom as well but not as badly. This led to a lot of damage to the ceiling and the formation of mould within the first bedroom and to a lesser extent in the second bedroom. As far as we are aware, the leak has only recently been sorted by the block management company(who owns the roof etc…) Just over three weeks ago, a large inspection hole was cut into the ceiling, the workmen (instructed to come by block management) who undertook the work did not put any dust sheets down over any of the furniture, causing an incredible amount of dirt and debris throughout the entire flat, rendering the room unusable. We were left on a Friday afternoon with a gaping hole and no instruction as to what was going to happen next. Only after contacting our letting agent to inform them about the state of the bedroom had been left in, with a gaping hole and bits of debris falling, did they come to do a temporary fix to cover the hole which was after a week. As the bedroom is still unusable. My daughter has for more than three weeks been sleeping in the lounge. The letting agent did offer to get the place cleaned, but we see no point until the job has been completed. My landlord has reduced my rent by £200 for the past couple of months and is now wanting full rent regardless of the work being incomplete. A plan has been put in place, however, we have not been given a timeline for when these will be completed and this could take some considerable time. In addition to this, there was a leak in the kitchen but this was very minor, and we have a major condensation issue in the bathroom as the extractor fan is apparently not strong enough so the ceiling is covered in mould which is now being revealed as the paint is flaking off. The problem we have is that the building (roof etc..) is managed by a block management company. My letting agent has basically said that the damage is the responsibility of the block management and this nothing to do with the landlord, and therefore, does not want to give us any compensation. What are my rights as a tenant in this situation? Am I entitled to a continued rent reduction or additional compensation given the ongoing uninhabitable condition of the bedroom and the disruption this has caused? I have attached photos as supporting evidence and would be very grateful for your advice. https://imgur.com/a/yfm4FP9 Should you require any further information, please let me know. Thanks in advance! 😁👍
    • I have just read it again and I see that you say that you are going to be claiming for time and stress. This is not recoverable loss so I think that you should leave it out.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell using SD for old BC debt **WON WITH COSTS**


Noumidia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4197 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

make a payment now so the balance is under £750.

 

There's an argument for an abuse of process as they are attempting to circumvent statute. The CCA 1974 sets out requirements lenders must follow for enforcement.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a court letter regarding the SD

 

1) The creditor shall by 4 pm on the 12/06/12 file with court and send to Mr xxxxx a statment exhibiting all documents upon which they intend to rely in support of the debt.

 

My question is if they provide all the document i asked for can i add in my application that the account is in dispute regarding the credit card charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would mention it, but it would continue outside of any court proceeding as well. If the SD was to stand and they ever moved towards bankruptcy, then any issues about charges could be addressed at that time.

 

No expert on this. I think the SD is only an enabling device that can then be used for bankruptcy proceedings, if the debt cannot be resolved by other means.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

In the court letter regarding the SD:

 

1) The creditor shall by 4 pm on the 12/06/12 file with court and send to Mr xxxxx a statment exhibiting all documents upon which they intend to rely in support of the debt.

 

2)The applicant (me) Mr xxxxxx shall by 4 pm 10/07/12 file with the court and send to the creditor a statment in reply.

 

3) The court day is 14/08/2012.I was told by the district judge that if Lowell miss the deade line then write to me to inform the court that they defaulted.

 

My question is there any special template letter? or what happen next

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could edit something along the lines of this and send recorded delivery to the court)

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

Case reference:

 

In the case of (Nasty DCA vs XXXXX)

 

On request of District Judge (name) I wish to inform the court / District Judge (name) and in line with the order of the court

 

That the claimant has failed to file any statement / documentation by the given deadline.

 

In light of the abuse of the insolvency rules, the defendant now requests a strikeout with an order for costs against the claimant.

 

I hereby declare that the facts laid out above in this statement are true.

 

(signed)

 

(dated)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I requested a SAR from Barclay Bank on 21/05/12 relating credit cards, however i have not received any reply from them, is there a template letter to follow? or do i need to call them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I requested a SAR from Barclay Bank on 21/05/12 relating credit cards, however i have not received any reply from them, is there a template letter to follow? or do i need to call them.

 

They have 40 days to respond from the date they receive the letter, I take it you sent it Recorded Delivery?

Once 40 days are up allow 2 days then if not received you then go to I.C.O. website and fill in a complaint form giving dates etc.

 

ICO must be getting fed up with the complaints about companies not complying with the rules, good maybe they start fineing them.

 

HSBC got a slap on this one after I complained.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my SAR this morning, however i am very disapointed of what they send.

Barclays are using their dirty tricks again when dealing with customer complaint.

 

They send the following documents.

  1. Credit Agreement.( PPI not tick)
  2. Dozens of corresponding letters.
  3. Data protection act reporting,

which contains

  1. a history of communications,
  2. credit limit increase,
  3. missing payments,
  4. last payment,
  5. Default notice,
  6. date PPI was cancelled,
  7. date the a/c was sold
  8. a load of usless information.

They never send a statment which shows

  1. transaction
  2. charges
  3. PPI and life insurance.
  4. I requested SAR for 2 Accounts and they send incomplete information only for one A/C.

I am preparing a letter before action (ConsumerWiki - Data Protection Act: Non-Compliance,template 2).

Thank you 42man for all your assistance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today,I received a letter from the court relating (see #33):

You letter dated xxxxxxxx was reffered to the District Judge who has directed that requests will be considered at the hearing on xxx August.

My problem is that i am not available during the date of the hearing and i dont know what to do. Do i delay the case ? which will cost about £80.

Please any help and thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the date changed or attend, too many people it seems do non appearance and loose, it is an important matter, and reading lowell threads you have to be careful , but others may be able to assist you with an idea , let us see.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can not attend because during this date i will be abroad and if change the date can i add the the cost to the claim ? or Can Lowell submit new evidences.At the moment the case is in my favour because they defaulted to submit the documents asked by the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my SAR this morning for both credit card accounts.However, the transactions were dated from 06/2004 to 06/2012 and the card were issued:

  1. Barcalaycard was issued 05/1997 and was sold on 06/2006, i know i canceled PPI on 02/2004, card protection, live insurance.
  2. Barclaycard (Mastercard) was issued 06/2000 till 2007, In the statement they dont show when they took about £800 from my current a/c on 11/2010.

So i am unable to claim charges on both account or to proove that the debt in Mastercard is less than £750.I send yesterday a letter before action requesting that "If you do not hold certain things / information then you have to confirm this in writing too ".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phone the court yesterday,asking them to change the hearing day, and i explained to them that the case is an insolvency case, the operator firstly said :"you need a N form." and i replied :" Is not a civil case" and then he put me on hold for few minute and said :"you need to fill a form 7.1.A and cost £70 ".I phone, twice and those courts operator are useless, I still dont know what to do and i am going away next week. Is anyone there had the some problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...