Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is Landlord responsible for problem tenants.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4423 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Im posting on behalf of a friend. He bought a house some years back and has had persistent problems with the tenants from next door (private landlord). It is mainly the noise, the last 3 tenants have had parties most nights till the early hours. My friend and his partner previously complained to the landlord who just laughed at them and told them it was not his problem. They then approached the council who did act, although it took quite a while, the problem was though that when the council approached the tenants they stopped the music for a few weeks then it all started up again and they were back to square one....in the end the tenants moved out, however, my friend and his family had barely had a decent nights sleep for over a year!

 

After a few months of being empty the landlord has now put new tenants in. On the 2nd night the music started up and lasted till way after 4am. The next night when the music started at tea time my friends girlfriend went and asked them to turn it down......................................the guy laughed at her and told her to "go away and stop being silly!" When she asked him again if he was going to turn it down the lovely guy spat in her face!!

 

To cut a long story short, the police were called but advised that it was not worth taking it any further as even if it went to court he would only receive a slap on the wrist. My question is,...is there any way that the landlord can be made to take responsibility for his tenants and also is there anything that can be done quickly....it took them a year previously just to get the council to do anything and the thought of having to put up with this lot for a year is really getting them down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i think the best way is environmental health noise abatement issues, its the tennants causing the problem not the landlord he cant know if the tennants play music or not. Is it a student house next door? was it let out when he bought his house?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. No its not a student house its a couple. All tenants so far have been on benefits, hate to be judgemental but it means they can party all night and sleep it off every day as they don't have to go to work (not that I am saying that this is what everyone on benefits does!) The first tenants when they moved in were ok, they were a family but didn't stay long. The landlord just doesn't seem to care as long as he gets his rent and knowingly allows them to cause a nuisance. They did go down the route of the environmental noise abatement with the last tenants but it took such a long time...and in this case I think it is more the threat of violence that they are worried about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I agree with siisited blondes first part and yes the tenants are the ones causing the issues not the landlord but

 

the landlord is partly responsible if they have been informed of these issues and have taken no action to try and resolve the issue.

 

I may be incorrect but other caggers will advise.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

"the landlord is partly responsible if they have been informed of these issues and have taken no action to try and resolve the issue.

 

In what way can noisy Ts LL be partly resp if he is not contributing to the noise? OK he can seek s8 order for breach of a specified contract term (causing nuisance to neighbours) but this ground is discetionary and he would have to prove it.

Noise abatement officers can confiscate nuisance apparatus after at least one previous warning.

 

Affecteted Ts have access to enforcement agencies who can decide if an offence is being comitted. LL may reveal ID of complainant leading to further aggro.

Whilst OPs LL may want to help, best advice is don't get involved with T/neighbour disputes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The individual tenants may have a contract with the landlord that spells out reasonable behaviour and may say they can lose the tenancy of breached.

 

Additionally does the landlord own the property ?. If it is a leasehold property then there will be another landlord (or freeholder) who effictively owns the land the building is on and takes care of the buidling as a whole, there will also be a lease, the lease will hold the landlord responsible for any breaches (which often do include noise, etc). It is possible to find out whether it is leasehold and the names of freeholders, etc from Land registry website, it will cost £4.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though it took a long time before they still need to contact EH re noise as apart from anything else it gives a history to the situation if anything else happens, they should also keep a diary of when and what time the issues arrise. EH will sometimes come out and take a metre reading of the noise levels BUT EH can be suspicious of people who constantly complain especially if it is about different people, it may be that although the noise may seem a lot it isnt just some people being more sound sensative. In the short term can your friend do some things himself to help himself deal with the issues, earplugs, moving his bed away from conecting walls, closing windows etc

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Fully agree with assisted blonde you need to be reporting this and keep a log.

 

Everytime an incident happens report it to police, local authority (try to get noise teams number especially for out of hours) and that landlord.

 

This may be of use to you:

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...