Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've not seen it personally but I think that's the letter Dad has had from Overdales. I'll see it tomorrow. It states balance: zero
    • Agreed as you clearly have little faith in your star runners, mind you - I have less - conditional on the welcher clause I defined being part, and that we are talking about the three defined candidates: Tice Farage and Anderson - not anyone anywhere as reform might (outside chance) get someone decent to run somewhere. If any of the three dont run - they count as a loss.   welcher clause. "If either of us loses and doesn't pay - we agree the site admin will change the welchers avatar permanently to a cows ass - specific cows ass avatar chosen by the winner - with veto by site on any too offensive - requiring another to be chosen  (or of course, DP likely allows you can delete your account and all your worthless posts to cheapskate chicken out and we'll just laugh) "
    • This is the full details, note they have made an error (1) in that paragraph 5 stated 14 days before hearing not 7. Surely a company of their size would proof read and shouldn't make basic errors like that 1) The Claimant respectfully applies for an extension of time to comply with paragraph 5 of the Order of Deputy District Judge XXX dated XX March 2024 i.e. the evidence upon which the parties intend to rely shall be filed and served not later than 7-days before the hearing. 2) The Claimant seeks a short extension of time allow them to further and properly investigate data provided to them by Royal Mail which is of importance to the proceedings and determination of the Claim. 3) The Claimant and Royal Mail have an information sharing agreement. Under the agreement, Royal Mail has provided data to the Claimant in respect of the matters forming the basis of these proceedings. The Claimant requires more time to consider this data and reconcile it against their own records. The Claimant may need to seek clarification and assurances from Royal Mail before they can be confident the data is correct and relevant to the proceedings i.e. available to be submitted as evidence. 4) The Claimant's witness is currently out of the office on annual leave and this was not relayed to DWF Law until after the event which has caused a further unfortunate delay. 5) The Court has directed parties to file and serve any evidence upon which they intend to rely not later than 14- days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 6 June 2024. Regrettably, the Claimant will have insufficient time to finalise their witness evidence and supporting exhibits as directed. We therefore respectfully apply to extend the time for filing/serving evidence so that the evidence upon which the parties intend to rely by filed and served not later than 7-days before the hearing i.e. by 4pm on 13 June 2024. 6) This application is a pre-emptive one for an extension of time made prior to the expiry of the deadline. In considering the application, the Court is required to exercise its broad case management powers and consider the overriding objective. 7) In circumstances where applications are made in time, the Court should be reticent to refuse reasonable applications for extensions of time which neither imperil hearing dates nor disrupt proceedings, pursuant to Hallam Estates v Baker [2014] EWCA Civ 661. 😎 It is respectfully submitted that the application is made pursuant to the provisions of CPR 3.1(2)(a) and in accordance with the overriding objective to ensure the parties are on an equal footing when presenting their cases to the Court. The requested extension of time does not put the hearing at risk and granting the Application will not be disruptive to the proceedings.   They have asked for extension Because 2) The Claimant requires additional time to consider and reconcile data received from Royal Mail which is relevant to these proceedings against their own data and records in order to submit detailed evidence in support of this Claim.
    • i was merely pointing out if the OP did put in an N244 it required a bundle. as for what they need to do now.... it might be an idea to post a link to your thread then the OP can read it and understand where your guidance is coming from and the ongoing process he will have to follow... dx
    • The notes entered into circulation yesterday and are proving popular with collectors, who will be hoping to snap up examples with low serial numbers.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

county court personal injury claim against me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4422 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi-first post.

in march 2009 i had my MGBGT mot'd. In may 2009 i then had a complete brake failure and crashed 5mph into another car. Insurers sorted the issue between themselves and i thought that was over with...

just today i have received a county court claim against me for personal injury caused against the child passenger(3 years old at the time) who has remembered in these hard times that he has suffered whiplash, bedwetting and psychological trauma.

the car i crashed into was previously involved in another accident in march 2009 in which the child passenger suffered similar casualty.

to me this claim is laughable and obviously after nearly 3 years this person(child(mother of))feels that it is about time she bought a new flat screen.

as part of the claim i would have expected to see some evidence of a medical report or something from her doctor close to the time of the accident though there is only the solicitors expert opinion on what the injuries are and how they were caused even though the child seemed fine at the time.

i am about to have a baby in 8 weeks and do not need this opportunist harassing me and would like to know if anyone can advise me as to where i stand and what i might do?

thanks in advance-karina

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes refer it to yuor insurers... they've already paid out once on the claim so no no claims to lose, and they will want proof of whiplas etc before they pay out.

 

And they'll delay it all they can too...

 

Just inform th solicitors in writing that you have passed the matter on to your insurers and that all further correspondence should be directed at them.

 

It makes no difference if yuo are no longer with the insurance company in question, they are still liable for the claim and will pay out if necessary or not if not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Child seats only prevent whiplash at 5mph when there is no potentially milkable insurance policy.

 

I hate to think of the litigation possible with the forces of kids heading footballs and jumping off swings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the claim will be done and dusted pretty much and all the child's solicitors have done is issue proceedings for the Court to approve the settlement agreed between the OP's insurers and solicitors.

 

In any event, you need to pass the insurers. Regarding the previous RTA, any medical expert will have had to review the medical records before coming to a decision and so they will have taken into account the previous RTA (hopefully).

 

This sort of claim is perfectly normal and insurers get hundreds of them a week. They know how to sniff out a fraud claim usually and so just let them get on with it would me my advice.

 

Interesting article I read yesterday about fraud blackspots for anyone who might be interest...

 

http://www.insurancetimes.co.uk/keoghs-index-finds-nine-new-motor-fraud-black-spots/1395249.article

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

i would have expected to see some evidence of a medical report or something from her doctor close to the time of the accident though there is only the solicitors expert opinion on what the injuries are and how they were caused even though the child seemed fine at the time.

 

That is a key statement which must be contested by your insurers.

 

A Solicitor is not a medical expert, the child will have to be examined by an independent medical expert, and therefore if the solicitor is saying that in his expert and professional opinion that the injuries were caused by X, then immidiately he/she is discredited.

 

Are you sure that it is a solicitor and not a legal exec from a claims management firm?

 

Given your statement, you appear to have grounds to make a complaint to the Law Society against the solicitor (if it is actually a solicitor) for professional negligence.

 

But most certainly as mentioned get it over to your insurance company, but make sure that they also flag up your concerns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure that it is a solicitor and not a legal exec from a claims management firm?

 

.

 

So what you are saying is that a qualified Legal Exec is more likely to make fraudulent or frivilous claims than a solicitor. I am sure ILEX would love to hear such things!!

 

Plus if you want to make a complaint against a solicitor/Legal Exec you must make a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman, not the Law Society.

 

I would also suspect that the lawyer in the proceedings is just setting out on the claim form and within the particulars of claim the alleged injuries sustained and not purporting to be a medical expert.

 

In any event, if proceedings have been issued and served without medical evidence, then they are in breach of the Pre-action protocol Para 2.14 and so service will not have been effected. Plus, the Claimant will not have established causation and a prima facie case without expert evidence and so coupled with the lack of service, an application for strike out can be made.

 

However, I still maintain that this has the feel of proceedings issued for a court approval.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thank you for the replies so far, I sent letters to the third partie's solicitor to notify them that I forwarded the claim form to my insurance company. I forwarded the claim form to the insurance company with a letter of explanation , all recorded delivery. No response. They haven't even corrected my name. I received a Final Judgement notice a week ago from the court and then today a Notice of Hearing! I am under the impression that the insurance company hasnt established any contact with the third parties solicitor nor the court. Now i am starting to worry as it appears the court expect me attend and take responsibility for the claim. The third parties solicitor is ignoring is emails, phone calls and requests to have him call me(S.Umerji of equitas solicitors, Lancashire) possibly counting on my(his) ignorance to bring about his claim.

Can someone please advise me if this is the normal procedure in a claim like this? All the correspondence is coming to me and not to my old insurance company, but does this mean that the insurance have or have not acknowledged responsibility for the claim against me(them!). To me it looks like i am the one who is held to account and that the insurance companys solicitors have neglected to step in and do their job. Should i not have received some kind of notice from the insurance company or do i need to send them and have them sign a statement that i am not responsible for any court appearances or payments? having sent the claim to the insurance company and then a letter to them and the third parties solicitor saying to both that i have sent the claim to my old insurance company, and having since received this final judgement and then the notice of hearing, what should my next step be? karina

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you not read the previous posts that have said the insurance company takes care of it? what you say cant be right otherwise why on earth would an insurance company 'offer' to pay out for someone making a dodgey personal injury claim against me? ...and whenever was i being negligent? ..and of what?

final judgement says-no defence having been filed it is ordered that the defendent(me/my insurance company(which one?))must pay the claimant an amount which the court will decide...and costs.(!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you not read the previous posts that have said the insurance company takes care of it? what you say cant be right otherwise why on earth would an insurance company 'offer' to pay out for someone making a dodgey personal injury claim against me? ...and whenever was i being negligent? ..and of what?

 

 

Yes your insurer SHOULD be taking care of it on your behalf but something may not be right. That is why I asked what exactly the Judgment you received said.

 

Also I'm sorry but in the eyes of the law you were negligent in causing the accident.

 

You keep referring to the claim as "dodgey" but unless you are a doctor you can't really say that for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to forward the documents to your insurer bit keep copies just in case. You then need to call and check they have them and have passed them to their nominated solicitor.

 

The Claimant has issued a claim (probably as they couldn't agree the correct level of compensation) and your insurer has ignored it at worst and at best is still sat in a backlog of post to work through.

 

You will not have to attend Court yourself as liability is not in dispute, only quantum.

 

If your insurer continues to fail to deal with this you could ultimately have enforcement proceedings issued against you personally so it is vital that you push you insurer into action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am a pharmacist-more qualified than your average G.P-but that is besides the point. i say dodgy because the doctor who has produced reports for the court wasnt even doctor, let alone the claimants(3 year old passanger/5 mph 'bump', psychologically scarred-following similar accident previous to mine!) doctor anywhere near the time of the accident!

I understand what you are saying anyway-bit when should i expect my insurance company(at the time) to take over? am i supposed to push the my old insurer or the claimants solicitor...all the while informing the court that everyone is ignoring me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, your insurer at the time of the accident.

Thank you very much for your help! I managed to contact the lawyers and they assured me that they are dealing with the case and going to cover all expenses. Such a relief...:):-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...