Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you honeybee if you would my head is mashed now. You guys our savers.  H
    • You can edit the answers to be in red or would you like me to do it? HB
    • Apologies dx100uk  I did not put the answers in red  Thank you all for your patience. H
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton  Name of the Claimant ? Overdales solicitors  How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  13 may 2024 What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account 4546384809766042. The defendant faild to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. The dbt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?   Not to my knowledge. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  Online but it was for a smaller amount they kept on increasing this with me asking Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  It was assigned to a debt collection agency  Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  Yes I also made offers to pay original creditor a smaller amount but was not replied to Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No Why did you cease payments? I was made redundant and got a less paid job I also spent some time on furlough during covid and spent some 3 months on ssp off work. What was the date of your last payment?  May 2021 Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes at the time I communicated with all my creditor's that I was running out of funds to pay the original agreements once my redundancy money ran out that was when my accounts defaulted. I then wrote to all my creditor's with pro rata offers of payments but debt collectors took over the accounts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

problem with dla appeal


johnnipain
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4459 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am new here but have a few problems I hope someone can help me.

firstly John has been getting high rate mobility and middle care for 7+years then in sept they used a very flawed esa medical nil points to remove all benefits

I have complained about this in sept but they state they never got any paperwork (I sent rec del and have the Proof of posting)

anyway the ESA people called him in late sept saying is this correct as the DM thought it was odd that after 7 years John was healed.

The outcome of this was the medical was overturned and John was given 15 points over 2 catagories

We then gave this info to DLA who said they would mark as a pass or remove this medical from further reconciderations

well we sent off 2 appeal forms they claim the first never got there 1 in sept 1 in dec and a whole bunch of medical evidence

Including a letter from my GP stating that John "remains serverly functionally restricted" can anybody tell me what that means?

but I sent this to DLA and they sent a submission to me that did not even mention the GP's letter

sorry one more thing he had a home visit from an EMP but she has not put his name or NI number on any of the pages bar the first is this a problem?

also she has ignored a lot of the medical evidence

Any help would be very appreciated

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

a letter from my GP stating that John "remains serverly functionally restricted" can anybody tell me what that means

 

sorry for the rush but i have an appointment with an advisor tommorow and want to be able to explain

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine the adviser would know what it means. I presume the letter also states what the severe functional restriction is.

 

It could mean John is still disabled, without knowing what the severe functional restriction is, it is impossible to be more precise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the Doctor mention in his letter how John remains serverly functionally restricted, is the function physical or cognative?

 

Sorry but without knowing the nature of the functional restriction it could mean anything. Such as still can't walk, or still has dificulty with completing simple tasks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

John has 3 prolapsed discs in his spine along with other problems I think I may have found it the dwp guidelines for DM's state in specific back pain care and mobility conciderations are at 3 levels mild/moderate and servere so he must be using there own terms to wrtie the letter

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Severe Functional Restriction

 

Category

DescriptionDisabling Effects

People with this level of functional restriction are likely to experience constant severe pain in their lower back for most of the time. The pain is likely to radiate into one buttock predominantly and travel down that leg below the knee into the foot and toes. The leg pain is often more severe than that experienced in the back, and is usually accompanied by numbness and tingling on the affected side in the specific region supplied by the nerve root. Tightening of the back muscles may add to the overall level of pain. Sleep may be disturbed by pain in some people. Moderate to strong analgesia may not be fully effective in relieving symptoms. Flexion of the spine is likely to be significantly restricted. Marked weakness of the thigh muscles may be present and there may be associated muscle wasting. Foot drop may be present. In cervical involvement, constant severe upper limb pain, weakness and abnormal sensation are present.

Mobility

Walking would normally be restricted in terms of distance (this may be in the range of 40 to 100 metres) and speed due to severe pain in the lower back and leg. They would normally have an abnormal gait, walking with a limp. There may be an increased risk of falls due to leg weakness, loss of sensation and foot drop although walking aids may help with mobility. There may be a need for guidance or supervision outdoors.

Care

People with this level of functional restriction would normally have difficulty coping with many activities of daily life. They may have considerable difficulties getting out of bed and out of the bath. They are likely to have difficulties with dressing, particularly with their lower garments e.g. trousers, socks due to bending difficulties. There may be considerable difficulty with other personal care tasks, such as rising from a normal height chair, climbing stairs and aspects of main meal preparations such as lifting pans, and bending to a traditional oven to insert and remove items. Due to leg weakness on one side, loss of sensation and possible foot drop, a risk of falls may be present. There may be a requirement for supervision and watching over if falls occur even with the use of walking aids. If affected on both arms there may be marked problems with dressing, preparing a main meal and toileting. If however only one side is involved, only bimanual tasks are affected

Link to post
Share on other sites

John/Sarah, while the DWP lose things and say they've never received things, the Tribunal srvice don't so don't panic once the DWP have done their reconsideration and it then goes on to the Tribunal service you can send things there and they will be part of your appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

are there any template letters on the forum for ask dwp for a typed transcript as the emp report is

unreadable (also has no personal info on any page it could be your medical lol)

 

can dla use a ESA medical to remove benefit?

 

and on my reasons for descision it states that "due to updated medical evidance you no longer have these needs " but i have looked through the stated paperwork and it does not say he is better anywhere the opposite in fact

I have asked Dla but they said it is the dm's opinion and thats that

 

Any help appreciated

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the DWP do routinely now use ATOS medicals to evidence DLA results. They tried that with me even though I appealed the ESA decision and won and still they tried to use that result! I just said "I am surprised that the DWP are using as evidence the ATOS medical on * date as an independent Tribunal subsequently found the result to be inaccurate and incorrect". It wasn't then referred to at the DLA Tribunal but the DWP will try anything. Having said that, had I not been successful at the ESA Tribunal, I think it would have been good evidence for the DWP at a DLA Tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

esa medical aug

 

Dla removed sept

 

I sent a GL24 in other paper work then waited was told ESA had been overturned and 15 points given and placed in wrag told DLA about this

 

got EMP medical

 

asked for EMP medical copy

 

a week later asked again for EMP medical copy and found out that first GL24 had never turned up but all the other paperwork did (i have rec del details)

 

so was told i had to do another even when i said i had copies so sent back form 2 with copy of form one stating there mistake and rec del form

 

early dec they log appeal ask phone up several times and am told that the ESA will not be used again as it was overturned but last recon and ESA listed

 

so in Jan I ask why they told me it has been removed now and sent a submission to the tribunal saying i am not happy with the ESA report being inc in submission

 

I phoned and tried to explain but no luck they have also put on the submission that the critera for DLA and ESA are completely different

 

But they don't seem to understand they removed my DLA with the ESA medical so how was it the same critera then

Edited by johnnipain
removing incorrect dates
Link to post
Share on other sites

they have also put on the submission that the critera for DLA and ESA are completely different

 

Given this, their reason for removing your DLA makes no sense at all. Yes, there is some criteria that is the same; but those benefits are both given for different reasons.

 

You might be able to use that as your argument, which must be based on a point of law. (that is, them not taking something into consideration. You can't appeal because it's not enough money)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just noticed along with no name/ni number on the EMP medical and lots of contradictions I can't find the dr on the GMC and she wrote the 20th on the medical but came on the 19th as the appointment letter stated

 

do you think someone is playing games with me or is micky mouse in charge?

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...