Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EON debt- what should i do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4453 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I changed my gas & electricity supplier from EON to NPower a couple of months ago. I have pre-payment meters for both and had no debt on my meters.

 

After the switch i was sent a final bill by EON totalling £41.60. It says on the bill that this is based on an estimated meter reading. At no point during the switch did EON ask me for meter readings and I have had no explanation of why I owe this money.

 

It rubs salt into the wounds when the reason I left EON in the first place was because their high prices meant that, even with a 2 year old in the house, we couldn't afford to have the heating on for more than a couple of hours a day as it was!

 

I admit i buried my head in the sand about this final bill and ignored it instead of ringing EON. They have now passed the debt to UDS who have now sent an 'intention of court action' notice which says a rep (bailiff?) could call to my address to collect the money.

 

I've read about recalibration charges - when tariff prices change but the meters are not updated to reflect them? - and think this may be why they claim i owe them money. But at no point did EON ever contact me to say my meter needed updating or try to arrange this.

 

So where do I stand on this? Can they take me to court for a bill that is only an estimated one? Is it too late for me now to contact EON themselves seeing as it is in the hands of UDS? Can a bailiff remove items from my property for debt like this?

 

I know, compared to some on here, my debt is a pitiful amount but for me it is the principle that's the issue here more than the actual amount. This is due in part to the fact that quite a few years ago i changed supplier from Yorkshire Electricity to Scottish Power. That time i was sent a final bill of (I think from memory) £190 - despite again having no debt to them and being on prepayment meters. In the end (after numerous phone calls back & forth and getting no explanation of why i owed this) I ended up borrowing this money from a family member to pay them off & rid myself of this "debt" - money i could ill afford to borrow.

 

Any advice as to what I should do now - especially now it has gone as far as threat of court action - would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you switch suppliers with a credit meter the company you are moving to sends the one you are moving from the changeover meter reading. They should not be using estimates.

 

How this works for pre-pay I don't know. It might be possible for the payments & meter readings to be out of line.

 

I would write or email to EON & ask why they have sent a bill for a pre-pay account, why there is an estimated reading and why they are pursuing this. Also contact the company you are moving to & ask what the process should be

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JS33

 

Don't worry about this account being passed to bailiffs, it hasn't reached that point.

 

As 2Grumpy says, it's the responsibility of the new supplier to send the old supplier the meter readings they'll use to open their account. The old supplier will then use the same readings to close their account. This ensures you're only charged once for the same energy. This is the same for both prepayment and credit meters.

 

If, after a certain time, we haven't received readings from the new supplier then the account will automatically close to estimated readings. However, we'll re-bill the account accurately as soon as we receive the correct readings.

 

We won't ask you for the readings because, by this time, you're not our customer.

 

The outstanding amount may just be down to incorrectly estimated readings. There used to be an issue with the old token prepayment meters. These needed re-calibrating by an engineer each time prices changed. However, these have nearly all been replaced with key meters.

 

We're able to re-set key meters by sending an electronic message to the meter each time there's a price change. This allows us to up date them immediately. There's the odd token meter still around, though, so I'm not discounting this totally but it is unlikely. Do you top up using a key or buy tokens?

 

Was there a delay when you changed suppliers? If there was, did you use the new supplier's payment device to top up the meters before the account actually switched to them? If you did, these payments may have gone to them for energy used whilst you were still with us. This would also lead to a debit balance showing on the account.

 

Don't worry if this did happen. There's an industry wide process in place to make sure this type of misdirected payment is returned to the correct account.

 

Talk to one of our prepayment teams about this (contact details are on your bills). Give them the readings your new supplier has used to start your account with them. They'll re-bill your account to these. If there's still a balance showing, they'll be happy to explain where it comes from.

 

Sorry for all the questions JS33 but hope this is of some use. Give me a shout if you need any more info as will be happy to help.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much 2Grumpy and Malc,

 

I'm not long home from a 12 hr shift so have only seen your replies tonight. I'll ring NPower & EON tomorrow though & try to get to the bottom of it.

 

There probably was a delay with my account as I submitted both my gas & elec readings to NPower via their website facility - then received a letter maybe 2 weeks later (?) saying they hadn't received my gas reading so i had to ring them up & provide this one again over the phone.

 

By that time I think I already had used my new NPOwer key & card to top up - so hopefully you're right Malc and this is what has happened. But that was all weeks ago now and EON haven't sent me any revised bills - the amount still says I owe them £41.60 on the most recent letters I've received.

 

I have a key for my elec meter but my gas one is still topped up with a card. Not sure what type but my meter looks exactly like this one:

(Sorry couldn't submit link as I don't have enough posts yet!)

Don't worry about asking me questions Malc, I really do appreciate your help. I'll update as soon as i've spoken to both companies.

Thanks again to both of you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

we also have eon rep here

he should pickup on this thread tomorrow

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JS33

 

Gas prepayment meters are usually topped up using a card. These generally work in a similar way to electric key meters, in that, electronic messages pass between the meter and supplier. This allows us to update meters with the correct settings.

 

Have you spoken to us yet? Would be interested in the outcome.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Malc/everyone,

 

Sorry only just updating this...

 

I spoke to NPower who confirmed the date they were charging me from. These tallied with the dates E-ON had billed me up to...but didn't really explain why i still owed anyone!

 

Then i spoke to a nice lady Carol at E-ON & she said their estimate appeared to be too high. She put me on hold a couple of minutes then came back on the line to tell me I don't owe anything as their estimate was too high.

 

Still don't really understand the how & why ....eg. how & why I can threatened with court action 'unless payment is made in full within 7 days' for money i don't even owe!....and I still feel that something dodgy has occurred!...but i don't owe E-On any money so that's good enough for me. :)

 

Just to add though - my 'debt' was only a small amount & had I been liable for it wouldn't have had too much trouble finding this kind of money. Can't help but wonder though how an old age pensioner or someone equally vulnerable would cope with receiving such threatening letters!

Edited by JS33
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi JS33

 

Sorry for the late reply. Have been out of the office for a couple of weeks.

 

Glad this is sorted. As I suspected, we'd closed to estimates and this resulted in a debt because they were too high. Once re-billed accurately, the false debt disappeared.

 

I do understand how disconcerting some of our debt letters can be. I've fed back about the tone of these letters before and will happily do so again.

 

We do have a responsibility to make customers aware at the earliest opportunity of the possibilities if debts are ignored. Consequently, the letters can sound harsh.

 

Anyway, happy you're sorted and many thanks for letting me know.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...