Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
    • lowell letter = we've mugged you once - why are you not paying this other debt....😎
    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
    • I see what you mean. I will wait till the 8 weeks is up and then take it up with FOS. Before I do will be on with some more details on the SAR. Thank you once again. 
    • Tagging @stu007 who's great with this. You should have at least 2 months notice with a Section 21 notice (Which Form 6A is used) For now, scan, redact and upload anything you think will be useful    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is this discrimination?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anybody advise me please?

 

I had an interview for a job I really, really, wanted. I didn't get the job, I was in the top 3 but they offered the job to another woman initially, she declined, then they offered it to the second person, a male and he accepted, started the job.

 

This may sound really silly and I am hoping somebody, detached from it all, can give their true opinion.

 

Problem I have is that I had been doing this job on a temporary basis for annual leave cover twice over the year, then recently again for the third time, whilst they advertised for the role on a permanent basis. I applied, got invited for an interview (I was working there at the time), and watched as all the candidates come to the office for their interview, I was the last one interviewed, only the 2 candidates, other than myself, were 'in the running', so to speak, so I was really excited as I had expressed how much I enjoyed working there and also how nervous I was because I really wanted the job. It was 'odd' that for the first time ever HR came to the office to interview alongside the Manager. Well it seems that HR thought I didn't answer the questions fully enough, I agree I didn't because I was so nervous on the interview, but I did tell HR I was nervous because I really wanted the job, but alas, I was unsuccessful. What's the problem, well I feel cheated and I'm not sure if I'm being PC or not, ut I'm a white 54 year old woman and feel that I was discriminated against as the first candidate they offered the job to wanted more money and the second candidate who did take the job, who arrived 20 minutes late for the interview and did not even apologise but HR said 'that's not a big problem, we can get past that'. I thought being late for an interview was a big problem. Am I being over sensitive? I don't feel fairly treated as I have never been late to work, and have been asked back there 3 times to work as a temp so they are obviously pleased with my work, I'm really confused on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

For discrimination to occur, you have to be treated less favourably on the grounds of a protected characteristic, the main ones being race, age, sex or disability (but there are 9 in total). Do any of these apply to you, compared with the two people ahead of you who were offered the role?

 

If not, and by your own admission you performed poorly at interview, then no, it's probably not discrimination as an employer can choose who they wish to fill a job role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's more common in public sector roles, btw, and most commonly found in employers addressing a disability equality balance, but it's still possible if ethnic minorities or young people are significantly under represented in the company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But would they tell me that was the reason. I feel silly about this because I know I did not give my best on the interview, although I was actually doing the job with no problems and the Manager was very happy with my work. How could HR just 'overlook' the disrespect of arriving 20 minutes late for an interview with absolutely no excuse or apology? Also, both these candidates were currently in work and I have been trying so hard to get a job for over a year! It doesn't seem fair at all with the current unemployment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think being late to interview is fatal these days, if I'm honest. Its also not discrimination or unlawful to hire someone already in employment, in fact most employers see this as favourable!

 

If you genuinely believe you were discriminated against unlawfully (rather than just being treated unfairly, and there is a difference in law) then you could submit a discrimination questionnaire... But this could make your current position at work difficult, so think carefully whether it's worth it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

An sorry, I thought you were covering the role!

 

In that case, maybe you have nothing to lose, depending on whether you need the reference? If you do submit a discrimination questionnaire, you can ask what interview questions were asked to each candidate and the reasons they were chosen over you. Again, however, you may be burning your bridges, so I'd think carefully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that being late is no killer if there is a reason and the candidate is good.

 

Is is public or private?

 

 

My previous employer told me that candidates may be able to ask to see interview notes, hence they keep them written down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to be honest I don't think I have nothing to lose. I would like to know why HR were there and how an obvious sloppy attitude to an interview, should have mentioned when asked if he had a problem finding the office he said no. But I do want to pursue this as I do feel truly upset and fed up with the situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Theghost, it's housing, so does that count as public sector? I just don't understand that if I have been doing the job, on three occassions, with no problems, how can it be fair to offer to somebody else simply because I was nervous, too keen, on the interview and I know I should 'tread carefully' but hey, I've been kicked in the backside, I can't just roll over and not protest can I?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean't to ask, does anyone know how I can find the 'discrimination questionnaire' as the link doesn't take me there. Also, if this was a question that they were working inside the law by 'balancing diversity', should I not have been made aware of that at some point? At least it would not have made me feel like I was good enough to do the job, and then to pull the rug out from under me and then say I wasn't good enough to do the job:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean't to ask, does anyone know how I can find the 'discrimination questionnaire' as the link doesn't take me there. Also, if this was a question that they were working inside the law by 'balancing diversity', should I not have been made aware of that at some point? At least it would not have made me feel like I was good enough to do the job, and then to pull the rug out from under me and then say I wasn't good enough to do the job:-(

 

On the first link there is an age discrimination template letter to send to employer.

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/ResolvingWorkplaceDisputes/DiscriminationAtWork/DG_10026429

 

http://www.lge.gov.uk/lge/core/page.do?pageId=119667#contents-2

 

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/equalities/equality-act-publications/complaints-Equality-Act/

 

http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/about-us/vision-and-mission/our-business-plan/race-equality/

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1841

Edited by bonnygirl
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...