Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
    • Paula Venomous refused to resign for 16 months and eventually did only because a doctor threatened to resign. Interesting snippets and insights in the article. Paula Vennells clung on to ‘plum’ NHS role after Horizon scandal ARCHIVE.PH archived 19 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hybrid installment orders allowing application for C/O help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I was awarded a CCJ installment order but then went back to court in December as MBNA/RESTONS wanted redermination hearing as they said would take too long to repay and want a C/O so wanted a forthwith judgment.

The judge ruled as the following:

 

It is ordered that

There be an order by instalments to continue at the rate of £xx per month as already ordered.

Liberty for both sides to review the order.

If so advised claimant be permitted to apply for a charging order, notwithstanding the instalment order already made.

date xx/xx/xx

 

I have now recieved an interim charging order as follows:

 

We enclose by way of service an interim charging order dated 5th february 2012 which is returnable for 8th March @ 11.00am at bla local court.

we enclose n379 form dated 30/1/2012 filed with the court in support of claimants application.

if you are aware of any creditors not mentioned please advise bla bla."

 

I have read that these orders are hybrid orders and my defence would have been based on THE COUNTY COURT ACT 1984

86 Execution of orders for payment by instalments..

(1)Where the court has made an order for payment of any sum of money by instalments, execution on the order shall not be issued until after default in payment of some instalment according to the order

 

Has anyone had experience of these orders as I cant seem to find out what the exact stance is based on both an installment order and the right to apply for a charging order?

 

I want to oppose the C/O but am really confused if the section 86 will be enough.:???:

 

If anyone can shed any light on the law in this case I would really appreciate some help.

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Molly my head hurts reading it.....well done you.

 

My forms have listed all my creditors so do the courts inform them or the solicitors?

 

Also im not sure if I should be getting the interim set aside or just objecting at the hearing?

 

If you can shed any light as I just dont understand why the judge has allowed me to make installments but given them the permission to apply for a charging order its that that I need to clarify as I want to object on the basis I have not missed any payment on my ccj even prior to redermination so they should not be able to give a c/o but I dont understand what notwishstanding the installment already made means.:oops:

 

:-)

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

...........

Also im not sure if I should be getting the interim set aside or just objecting at the hearing?

 

 

:-)

 

you would be objecting to the interim order, re the grounds you mention and anything else.

these 'hybrid' orders are contentious, and seem to rely on the judge lottery unfortunately.

perhaps also pm cymruambyth for input. afaik, c's case (won) seemed to rest on the fact that the ICO was after the instalment order. eg http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?203298-A-guide-to-Charging-Orders-amp-Orders-for-Sale/page24 #467, but not sure whether there was a further redet'n order allowing a CO in that case or not?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, No the house is in my name only,

I will have a look at that thread and see if It will help.

 

Im just confused that they can add things in to allow charging orders when installments havent been unpaid.

 

Judge lottery is very annoying as no matter what I read it doesnt apply as he has put this in!

 

:evil:

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent a PM as suggested so fingers crossed.

 

I can see what you mean about the thread as my origional CCJ was set and I paid it then they requested re determination and my installments were continued

as origionally ordered and they have been paid.

 

:-)

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent a PM as suggested so fingers crossed.

 

I can see what you mean about the thread as my origional CCJ was set and I paid it then they requested re determination and my installments were continued

as origionally ordered and they have been paid.

 

:-)

 

 

 

How much is the CCJ for and what was the level the repayments were set at?

 

Why did you not defend the CCJ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The debt is for £8500 and payments set for £50 based on income expenditure.

I couldnt defend the debt as I had the correct defaults and they sent copy of cca so did not think i would have a leg to stand on to be honest.

I do have other debts though and between credit card and o/d with hsbc it is slightly more than mbna and also card with natwest of about 5k. I have reduced payments agreed with

both and stopped interest.

Hope this helps :oops:

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The debt is for £8500 and payments set for £50 based on income expenditure.

I couldnt defend the debt as I had the correct defaults and they sent copy of cca so did not think i would have a leg to stand on to be honest.

I do have other debts though and between credit card and o/d with hsbc it is slightly more than mbna and also card with natwest of about 5k. I have reduced payments agreed with

both and stopped interest.

Hope this helps :oops:

 

 

I was going to suggest applying to det aside but looks like you already considered that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did look at papaerwork to defend but to no avail.

 

I have since my redermination however put in a complaint to ombudsman on unfair lending practices, the banking crisis hit in 2008 and they increased my limit 5 times in a 12 month period by 6k! from 3k limit to 9k. I have complained as my details and affordability to repay was not checked they sent blank cheques with every statement so i feel they have added to my financial difficulties as when times got hard I started to use the available balance and now are turning an unsecure debt into a secured debt.

 

I know Im clutching at straws but I want them to justify that to the ombudsman and if upheld they can reduce my debt.

:-)

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

No it was all very quick and to be honest it was only after the re determination I examined my statements and thought wow thats a lot!

 

my main aim was not to get a forthwith as I knew I would be heading for a c/o but it seems irrespective of not getting forthwith judgement Im over a barrell still anyway.

 

Oh to be a debtor :whoo:

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I will give you any help that I can. My thread which has been posted above covers just about everything.

 

When I lost in court I was given 4 weeks to come to an arrangement; when I got a letter of confirmation I belatedly applied for an instalment order. The solicitors applied for the ICO a couple of days after my application. My instalment order was granted days before their application was granted. I prepared this defence CO defence master.pdf. My DJ said that as I had an instalment order the case of Mercantile Credit was applicable and the CO application was thrown out. They tried to throw other cases into the mix but the DJ said that Mercantile Credit had precedence.

I sent my WS defence plus an abbreviated version for my OH to the court a week before the hearing was due. I also took copies of the instalment order as the DJ didn't have it on file. Plus I wrote out the dates to show that the instalment order was granted first. I also took proof of my payments.

 

 

Just because they have leave to apply for a CO doesn't mean it will be granted. In agreeing to my instalments the creditor wrote to say that they would be applying for further enforcement ........ but didn't get it.

 

If you any more information let me know and I will try to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thank you so much I will use that argument as my CCJ was agreed and maintained prior to redermintation hearing so hopefully that rule should still stand. Your info was really helpful as I am not very good at wording legal stuff.

 

Another question ....Do I have to sent Restons a copy of my defence? or can I just send to the court. I dont really want to give them a heads up on my defence.:lol:

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

..........

 

Another question ....Do I have to sent Restons a copy of my defence? or can I just send to the court.........:

 

 

ordinarily, both. at least 7 days before the hearing. see civil procedure rule part 73.8 etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ford.

Interesting word ordinarily..

 

Ok lets try another word lol... hyperthetically if I dont what would or could happen?

 

:-)

 

:) don't read too much into the word. was just posting that the cpr say that both 'must' be done not less than 7 days before the hearing.

did you not get any procedural notes to that effect with notification of the ICO?

 

anyway, note also practice direction 73 para 1.2 (4) etc.

could it not follow then that the 'notwithstanding' order means that a co can be applied for but only when there are unpaid payments re the instalment order 'if so advised'? ie reaffirming the current legal position? as in the cpr? why does cpr specifically ask for info re unpaid instalments if that is not relevant in considering a final CO?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I will send them a copy of my defence then in that case as I dont want to jeopordise my case.

 

I did not recieve any instuctions on the interim c/o and the covering letter just gave details of the date and time and asked me to disclose any other debtors not mentioned in the list they had on the c/o.

 

It doesnt even say if I want to object to send objections to the court 7 days beforehand, I have just established that from what I have read so thats why I am questioning if I have to send them details as they havent provided me any instruction to do so, as a layman who knows nothing about law its a bit cheeky to expect me to comply with the rules :|

 

The application completed for the c/o in section 2

Judgment debt is annotated as follows

X £ (see paragraph 7) of the instalments due under the judgment or order has fallen due and remains unpaid

(or) The judgment or order did not provide for payments by installments

 

Section 7 is the further information section and they have put the following:

The judgement creditor asks the court to take into account the following:

further to district judge smith and order dated xx/12/2011, claimant has permission to apply gor a charging order.

 

Do they not need a reason to apply or just that because the judge said we can so we will.

:???:

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they not need a reason to apply or just that because the judge said we can so we will.

 

 

 

They have permission to apply for a C/O so unless you can give some very good reasons they will get it.

 

The likelihood is the FCO hearing will have the same DJ sitting that made the Order so you will need to fight for him/her to change her mind. Not an east task with DJs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

my reasons are county court act 1984 section 86 installments not in default.

 

I have not defaulted on ANY installments on my CCJ since issued and my installments were ordered on a CCJ prior to redermination then kept the same so no changes to amounts etc at hearing so surely that is the law and that is how he should make a judgment?

:|

:p S x :p
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...