Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IND Court Claim Received


Kasier
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. I’ve just received court claim from Robinson Way Ltd / IND. I used to have a bank account and credit card with HSBC but stopped using it since beginning of September 2006.

 

A few weeks back I received a letter from IND saying I owed over £6 for a HSBC Credit Card, then saying if I didn’t pay it would go to court which now I have a letter for that.

 

Please can someone help I have no idea what I need to do or what needs to be done.

 

Here is what the Court letter Says: (Date issue was 25th Jan 2012)

 

'The claimant is the assignee of a debt(s) from HSBC plc. Notice of assignment was provided to the defendant by the claimant in writing. Despite demand for payment the assigned debt(s) remains due. The claimant complied with section III and IV and annex B of the PD Pre-action conduct.

 

and the claimant claims:

credit card account number xxxxxxxxxxxx balance of 6,xxx as of x/x/07 interest under s69 of the county court act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from x/x/07to x/x/12 of 2,xxx and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of 1.44 and cost.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi PGH7447, I dont' remember receiving one but i have moved a lot over the year so they may have sent one, the claimant is robscumway.

Edited by Kasier
Link to post
Share on other sites

a side issue for now, but their claim for interest should prob be regarded as unreasonable, dependent on the circumstances. 5 years to start a claim!

Link to post
Share on other sites

kaiser

if you are defending, then you would need to acknowledge your intention to do so online (if northampton) in time (v. soon?). you'll then get a further 14 days to submit a defence. more if you can then agree an extension with the claimant.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

IND don't seem to have Notice of Assignment for alot of these claims. The last letter before legal proceedings state, that they have been appointed by the DCA to collect the balance.

Now i havn't received my court papers yet,they will be coming shortly no doubt. Who are the solicitors in the POC acting for, the DCA or IND.

What im trying to settle in my mind is if there is no assigment to IND how can they claim the debt. If there is no assigment but they act on behalf of the DCA is that enough in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IND don't seem to have Notice of Assignment for alot of these claims. The last letter before legal proceedings state, that they have been appointed by the DCA to collect the balance.

Now i havn't received my court papers yet,they will be coming shortly no doubt. Who are the solicitors in the POC acting for, the DCA or IND.

What im trying to settle in my mind is if there is no assigment to IND how can they claim the debt. If there is no assigment but they act on behalf of the DCA is that enough in court?

 

Good question - they appear on the scene with a letter before action and go straight to litigate, claiming that an assignment was issued from the OC to the DCA involved, and on the POC they are nowhere to be seen, I send a cpr and the solicitor just sent me the letter before action claiming that was the assignment, but of course it was not, so I dont really know what they are playing at, but I am damned sure I will inform the judge of this smoke and mirrors approach

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh IND aren't named, Robinson way are. address for sending documents etc is for HEGARTY LLP?

 

If you scroll through all the Ind related threads, most people have stated that Ind are assigned to their debts and Hegarty are Ind's solicitor. With the cases where another DCA have appointed Ind to collect the debt in the letter before action it states make payments to Ind even though they're not assigned to It... Dodgy I must say, not to mention a good reason to report them to OFT!!

As regards to the POC's Inds name is not mentioned anywhere on the claim form, but Hegarty llp are!! and it states that if your to settle before judgement then make payments to Hegarty not the claiment (DCA) who is assigned! - So it makes me wonder if the claim was settled before judgement who gets the money, Current assigned DCA or IND!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH7447

We have lightly touched this subject before. So on your court paperwork who are the claimants, Solicitor or DCA (obviously not naming them). What i understand then is that IND arn't named ?

 

The claimant is robscum and the sols are heggies, IND are not mentioned anywhere, I have since written to robscum with a without prejudice letter and they have said deal with IND, so who knows what they are playing at, and the only time I will deal with them is when I get to court, also people have said that they have called IND and the person who answered said they worked for Arrow, another debt collector, and people have rung heggies and got IND, all a bit suspicious if you ask me.

 

hopefully the complaints are racking up and the OFT take notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh its northampton, what would be the best course of action?

 

if you are defending then log on in time and enter your intention to defend.

some info re poss getting required info mentioned. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?159445-Getting-Them-To-Reveal-Their-Vitals.-Using-CPR-31.14-to-Your-Advantage

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?255329-CPR-part-18-vs-CPR-31.14-Confused-well-read-here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

what did you do? you've acknowledged service online MCOL? you'll then have a further 14 days in which to submit a defence. have a read of the links posted.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

as has been posted, there may be an issue re assignment and the agreement. so yes could do the the 31.14 request and see what they come up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ensure that you request the 'notice of assignment' and 'credit card agreement' that have been mentioned in their particulars of claim. can also include the 'default notice', despite it not actually being mentioned (they can only refuse on that!) (also, a valid def notice (if applicable) would be required before there can be any court enforcement)

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

tomorrow? maybe too late to get an extension. unless can arrange it with claimant via phone fax and then fax to court in time. but that may be cutting it fine. so, if defending, maybe do a 'holding' type defence in time basically saying unable to plead, claimant has failed to respond to your legitimate and reasonable request under cpr 31.14 for the required documentation ie agreement, notice of assignment, default notice? and has failed to agree to an extension as offered? see what others think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kasier

 

Oh bugger, no extension requested?

 

Bell the other side and follow up with an e-mail/fax tomorrow seeking an extension of 28 days to file defence, [you just need to quote the request is pursuant to CPR15.5] whilst they gather docs requested re; 31.14, include a reminder for the docs at the same time.

 

If you get a response by no later than say 13.00hrs file it with the court attached to a short covering letter stating case number and parties.

 

Failing that you'll need to get a basic defence filed in the afternoon, 16.00hrs is the cut-off so would suggest you get this sorted early rather than late afternoon. Below is a veeeeeeeeeeeeeery basic one, adjust to suit. Include an additional line [Fords post above] re: no response to CPR31.14 request, or extension request 15.5

 

 

 

IN THE (NAME) county court Case No

BETWEEN:

 

 

 

 

 

Give Claimant's Name (Claimant)

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

You - Give Name (Defendant)

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEFENCE

 

 

1 The Defendant denies that the Claimant is entitled to any of the relief claimed or at all.

 

2 For want of any or any adequate particularity apertaining to the allegations concerning the account/s, the Defendant's default, termination and its assignment the Defendant is embarrassed and unable to further plead to the Particulars of Claim.

 

I, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

DATED:

 

SIGNED:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, that's it.... get their agreement in writing first then copy to the court for the ext of 28 days :-)

 

Don't rely on a last minute response from them though, make sure you get either the extension or your defence filed as early as possible tomorrow.

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...