Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder

fred12345

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About fred12345

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. Thanks Eb. I will at some point sort the pictures out.. I have plenty more - but as it's early days I'm in no rush. A notable thing regarding this car Park is there are around 2 or 3 small shop unit car parks to the back which are not owned or run by Euro car parks but you have to drive through this car Park to gain access to them. At this stage should I ignore or write to them highlighting their contract is naff?
  2. She was parked right down the far end of this car Park within a marked disabled bay with a badge. As on the NTK.. We are using cameras to capture images of vehicles entering and leaving the car Park to calculate their length of stay. The signage, which is clearly displayed at the entrance to and throughout the car Park states that this Is private land, the car Park is managed by ucp and sets out the terms and conditions of the car Park by which those who park in the car Park agree to be bound. The parking charge notice &$#@ has been issued as the vehicle was in breach of the following terms and conditions; No valid pay and display / permit was purchased. The vehicle was parked at West Street Car Park. By remaining at the car Park without authorisation, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the signage, the parking charge is now payable to Euro car park (as the creditor)
  3. please answer the following questions.* 1 Date of the infringement 17/05/2018 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 24/05/2018 3 Date received*29/05/2018 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?]*Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?*Only pictures (black and white) of number plates 6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up* 7 Who is the parking company?*Euro car parks 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]*West Street Car Park Newbury For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.
  4. Euro car parks have issued a Notice to keeper. Date of Event: 17/05/18 Date issued: 24/05/18 After winning a previous case on parking and being very careful (mostly) my wife was issued with a Notice to keeper for parking on land which see assumed was council or public pay and display parking (with a disabled badge. However little did she know it was another badly signed car park by yet another bunch of crooks! Now another battle.. So this wasn't a windscreen ticket but anpr that show just the number plates!. What's the correct route to seeing these fools off? Cheers again
  5. Just received your message about my WS. Looks like yours is now approved by the site team, it's probably to late to send my over to you now.. Hopefully you'll nail them with yours - there's a few points in yours which I also have in mine. Good luck and I will at some point copy mine up and post up so people can see it.
  6. I will go on the chase for costs directly to ukcpm. As much as I'd like to feed my unicorns on the moon - a bit like sadstones tried with us! What / how much charges should I be claiming from them? Keeping in mind I represented so 2 of us had time off work etc..
  7. As I've just won a case in Basingstoke and keeping an eye on yours - being in the same town - I can only hope you end up having DJ Glen. Fantastic judge! He focused on one thing only (conflicting signs) that renders a contract invalid.. good luck
  8. Still beaming today and laughing my head off on how DJ Glen reduce the rep to a blabbering wreck. I lost count how many times he said to her "well come on you're supposed to be representing the claimant and you can't even answer a simple question"... and her more than often reply "I only got the paperwork yesterday" my wife was sure she was in tears almost! The fact the rep tried to throw the judge of the grilling on the lack of having any contract on conflicting signs by changing the subject grace periods I can only assume that annoyed him as he snapped at her and swiftly moved to sum the case up.. I'm also wondering if ukcpm should of sent me a copy of the statement explaining further why signs had 2 different prices on them? This was requested by judge Glen at the preliminary hearing, he read this statement out from sophie fenn during the hearing yesterday.. sure I remember reading that all further requested doc should be sent to all parties. I didn't get asked if wanted to claim back costs by the judge and as both me and the wife were left in shock how bad the rep was it totally slipped my mind as we left..
  9. Ok hear goes.. The usual chit chat in the waiting room but she was told we have nothing to say. I presented the judge with a letter asking to adjourn or to sling out the statement as Sophie Fenn wasn't there and challenged the rights of audience. He wanted to carry on.. So it turns out that gladstones had sent a CPR?? In saying they were not going to attend but for some reason a rep showed up. Going for the hope that as we never attended the preliminary hearing, we wouldn't show at the main hearing. In the preliminary hearing ukcpm were asked to submit a further statement as to why there are signs that contradict each other.. £90 & £100! The reason was they changed the rates in 2014 to £100 but the sign hasn't been updated! The rep was trying to say there's still a contract in place regardless.. the rep was more nervous than us.. The judge took about 10 minutes to talk about why no contract can made on having the signs being conflicting.. the rep wanted to talk about the grace period as in my statement but he cut her short and said the grace period is irrelevant as with all other points in our witness statement that were also good strong points that would of also shown that no contract could of been made. So there you go! CASE DISMISSED and yet another gladstones fail. Thanks all of you for the help. Please do pop up the link for a donation as you deserve it.
  10. Just getting ready for Thursday.. question relating to keeper liability. The car was ticketed on 4th March. What I can only assume is the notice to keeper (worded as "FORMAL DEMAND do not ignore this notice")this can be found in the claimants bundle of lies I uploaded a few post back. The date on this letter is 5th April. Am I correct they've failed to create keeper liability?
  11. Cheers all. Much appreciated.. I just wonder which hurdle they'll fall at.. Not paying the fee = booted out. We turn up, they don't. They send a tea boy, and it gets booted. Or I get a trial and sink them.. I'm kind of hoping for the last one in a way! I like to think that all the effort I've put in to defending it has a final result rather than just thinking what would of happened. Out of interest has gladstones won many cases in court that have been fully defended? I haven't seen one on CAG unless I missed it..
×
×
  • Create New...