Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
    • oh no just logged in and it says a judgment was issued literally 2 hours ago! see attached Screenshot 2024-04-29 214754.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Tribunal Aid - Practical and Mental?


Sura
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I only have recieved the evidence pack, no forms.

 

I guess I'll wait. Thank you.

 

Hello again.

 

I'm still not sure what forms they were talking about. Would you mind confirming please, you've sent off a GL24 or a letter saying you want the DWP to reconsider their decision about your ESA and they've said no?

 

I'm happy to be corrected, but I thought the next step was the tribunal.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what's happened so far;

 

I attended a medical.

I recieved my letter saying I scored 0.

I filled in a 'Why you think we are wrong,' form and wrote a letter stating I'd like to appeal and why. I sent it off with my GP's letter.

I recieved a pack last Thursdsay stating a Decission Maker has refused to look over my appeal and so the decission is still 0 points. The pack contains a copy of everything so far, my letter, ESA50, ATOS report, etc.

On the front of the pack is a letter with Tribunal addresses but no dates and no information of what to do next.

It states I should be expecting some 'forms for my completion' within '2 weeks of the submission.' ?

 

Maybe that'll help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Does it say the DM [decision maker] refused to look at your appeal [request for reconsideration], or that they looked at it and refused to change the decision please?

 

I'm still confused about the forms, I would have thought the next thing would be a tribunal date, but maybe not very soon. But the pack they've sent you sounds like the documents you need to mount your case against the decision not to reconsider.

 

Is there a name on the letter of someone you could ring to check what else they're sending you and if your papers have been/will be sent to the Tribunals Service?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just a bit concerned that you waiting for forms that might not arrive, not sure what forms they are, will mean you have missed the deadline to tell them you are appealing. If it were me I would just write and say I am appealing and state why, again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a phone number but I'm guessing I could ring the DWP and try and work my way through the Hold times and try and get some info! I'm also worried I'm waiting on forms that may never come.

 

I'm unsure, HB. The sheet at the back of the pack has the 'Revision refused' box ticked, and the statement from the DM says 'There was no additional evidence provided and I saw no break in the law.' That's all I know.

 

I'm going to go ahead and collect some evidence, and I've already made a list of things I can't do and worked on the score I think I should gain from their criteria. I've also annitated the ATOS report, outlining where the doctor has contridicted himself, lied, noted down undiscussed matters or given vague/twisted answers. :/ (Which was quite shocking, but more common after reading everyone's posts on here!) So I am fully prepared to appeal again or make a case for Tribunal either way...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sura,

 

I've been through this before.

 

First off, there are no other forms to wait for.

 

From what you're posted, you've sent in your appeal, it's been reconsidered by the DWP and the DWP DM has refused the reconsideration.

 

You're now at the stage where you prepare your written submission to the Tribunal Service, and gather evidence.

 

Secondly, forget about phoning the DWP. It's better to do everything in writing (as you have been doing), so you continue the 'paper trail'.

 

Don't be fearful of the CAB / Welfare Rights. Their job is to assist you. Let them help.

 

I was nervous about going through it all with the CAB / Community Legal Service lady, but she couldn't have been nicer. She's taken a lot of stress away, just by writing to the DWP / ATOS / The TS on my behalf (I'd prepared my own submission to send as well).

 

You're on the right track.

 

First things first. Tomorrow, make your appointment with the CAB for help with preparation / representation.

 

All the best, and good night.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help.

 

I've had a few set backs - in that my Physiotherapist has moved hospitals and now I need to wait 2 weeks and start seeing a new one all together... I also don't have a GP appointment till the 23rd, but once I see those 2 people I can have my medical evidence.

 

I will also make a CAB appointment.. Just very nervous. :(

 

Is there a time limit on this like there is with the appeal process? A month?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Regarding the time limit on the appeal process, to give you an idea;

 

I had my Medical last June '11; Zero points in July; Reconsidered by DWP automatically in August; Still zero points; Appeal then submitted to Tribunal Service in September '11;

 

Still waiting for an appeal date!

 

TS have told me that they're currently confirming dates for appeals received by them last July.

 

So, I'm looking at another month - two months before my Hearing.

 

I have submitted my written statement via the CAB, who have in turn, sent it to the TS. Also sent in my GP's letter, and just waiting for one more letter now from a friend.

 

You can probably expect to wait at least six months.

 

However, the sooner you can see the CAB / gather supporting evidence the better, as you can then focus your energy into getting well.

 

About 70% of ESA Appeals are apparently successful at the Appeal stage, with representation.

 

Good Luck.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello!

 

Sorry for the late updates and all.

 

I have gotten someone from CAB involved, they've come round, spoke to me, looked over the case and the situation. She agreed the doctor's report looks suspisious.

 

However, she also says that if your partner is claiming carer's allowance, they can apply for income support and there's no need for anyone (at least with DLA/Carer's) to go through this...? I'm unsure how true or not that is. She suggested it to me because mine was not going to be a life-long problem, probably a year at most.

 

I don't know. I'm clueless.

 

If this expirience has taught me anything It's that the system is made to be played. It's like some sick game. If you don't know how to fill in a form 'correctly', it doesn't matter how honest you are, or how ill you are. They want specific sentances, terms, etc. It's... kind of scary, in honesty. And the types of help out there are split between those who will help you fail or those who will help you succeed, very few who will help you find what's best for you and your condition.

 

~

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...