Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Changes at HFO / Turnbull Rutherford – Quarterdeck Law Ltd


DonkeyB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 306
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The problem for anyone associated with HFO in trying for a pre pack would be getting a consumer credit licence!

I was discussing the events that are unfolding here with a very learned colleague and the thought occurred in discussion ''would it be possible for consumers affected now

or in the past by the business tactics of the whole HFO/TR affair to petition the OFT and other regulators regarding the unsuitability of any ''phoenix'' arising from this ''package''

to be granted a CCL.

A reasonable idea to my mind but would need much care and consideration and a lot of hard work.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The aim of a pre pack/phoenix is to maintain jobs and continuity.

 

However, any assets must be INDEPENDENTLY valued.

 

I fancy the OFT will be on the ball, given that the licences are all MTR.

 

Though why the liquidation forms state that HFO (UK) Holdings was in the debt collection business I do not know – the company has no consumer credit licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The aim of a pre pack/phoenix is to maintain jobs and continuity.

 

However, any assets must be INDEPENDENTLY valued.

 

I fancy the OFT will be on the ball, given that the licences are all MTR.

 

Though why the liquidation forms state that HFO (UK) Holdings was in the debt collection business I do not know – the company has no consumer credit licence.

 

That is odd, but then what isn't with this lot????

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem for anyone associated with HFO in trying for a pre pack would be getting a consumer credit licence!

 

Of course the purchasing company would need such a licence PRIOR to purchasing all those accounts wouldn't they, you couldn't just purchase them and then apply for the licence retrospectively could you because wouldn't that be a criminal offence and invalidate all those lovely assignments? HFO are far too clever to ever do anything quite that stupid aren't they?

 

 

Aren't they? :oops:

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s something I would like all the authorities to look at.

 

Here is an part of a court application signed by Diana Nelson in the name of Turnbull Rutherford.

 

DNelson.jpg

 

Here is a screen grab of Diana Nelson’s current Linked In account, showing her employment with Turnbull Rutherford for nearly six years.

 

DiananelsonLinkedInFull.jpg

 

 

BUT... on the documents I uploaded in post #224, statement of affairs, Diana Nelson is listed as being owed money as an employee of HFO (UK) Holdings Ltd. Which is a completely separate legal entity from HFO (UK) Holdings Ltd.

 

Now, how on earth is that possible? What’s going on here, Bart?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon Donkey hows tricks? seems my credit report is well and truely on the up :) and my dealings with our friends at HFO have come to an end just like the company (fingers crossed) still keep popping in though like to keep my hands in .Regards GH

:) HFO fan club member :) HFO V GLORYHUNTER ( WON ) :)

0 - 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon Donkey hows tricks? seems my credit report is well and truely on the up :) and my dealings with our friends at HFO have come to an end just like the company (fingers crossed) still keep popping in though like to keep my hands in .Regards GH

 

GH, wasn’t your account supposedly assigned by BC to HFO in March 2008? I seem to remember that. The only direct assignment by Barclaycard to HFO Capital Ireland we have ever seen, with, er, paperwork. Amazing as I don’t think Barclaycard sold them anything after 2007. Did you ever get to the bottom of that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Donkey, you crack me up! Hey Bart, when one of you HFO/Rox/TR cronies look in again, would you be so kind as to tell me who I should be writing to? Since you still haven't answered my complaint or the one lodged with FOS, I'd quite like to know who to address my " stick this in your pipe and smoke it" letter to? Come on, you wanted to play silly buggers, don't back out now! What happened to taking me to court and stripping all my mortal possessions? I miss the letters, Bart, I just don't feel you're putting the effort into our relationship anymore.......perhaps we need some time apart? You know, do some soul searching, find ourselves?

 

Love and Huggles :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonders if this is why I have had a letter from TRS today dated the 13th and posted the 15th Feb, with my request for the credit agreement which I asked for twice 7 months ago, although they attached an application and a blank Credit Agreement which has a reprint date of a year later than the application. Do you think that they are trying to get as much as they can in.

 

Also go the usual dribble of 14 days to pay or they will issue leagal proceedings !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

 

I will of corse replt tommorow stating all of this and will be making a full complaint to the OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or maybe not.....

 

O well then see how far they go, I intend to take it as far as I can after the treatment from HFO and TRS they have made my life hell over the past year if it was not for these site I would not of had a clue how to handle them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mohair, welcome aboard

 

Glad this is helpful - please continue to contribute and start a thread if you like and give us more details, particularly about what type of account this is.

 

Certainly inform TR that they have not fulfilled your request and any attempt at legal action will be vigorously defended and also get a complaint to OFT ASAP, particularly about TR as HFO seem to have been put to sleep!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...