Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome got CCJ/CO without my knowledge - help to set aside please


Andrew25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

no.

 

so they've gone via the back door and sent everything to an old address

 

get it set aside .

 

did you ever get the SAR done?

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

no to be honest they accepted my £85 quite easily and when i was chatting with a friend at work

he said that the original CCJ doesnt show up because I agreed to pay it.

so they didnt like, enforce it or whatever.

 

So I never bothered with the SAR. Wish I did, was just reading that other welcome thread where it took the op months and then they only sent statements.

 

They havent sent anything to my old house. Its my parents, so I'm there all the time picking up mail as I havent changed address for my bank cards etc.

 

 

Really screwed me careerwise tho...

I was just about to walk into a Managment job finally, now I won't get the licence and probly wont even get offered the job :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

your freind is wrong.

 

if you did not ever get a claim form or any docs from the court

before the cases

 

then you canget it set side

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh yeah of course I just reread thread and I discovered this.

 

So the original was a notcie of attachment of earnings. no doubt for the 5k odd they mention here.

 

And because I've missed payments in dec/jan (??) they have send it through for collection ? Even though I missed loads of payments between...

 

I'm just in the process of writing the CAPS people a very ****ty email that I will probly delete before I send. Surely they would have the sense to check up the balance on 5 year old orders before banging letters out to peoples employers ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There has to be a judgment in place to enable an Attachment of Earnings Order ( this is the enforcement) .

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i found the old notifice of attachment of earnings thing, and it is the saame amount... can they do that? i would have thought they would at least have to find out what the balance is.

 

deleted images because i messed about with them and it went funny

 

 

I still kinda dont understand though..

 

so they take you to court, get an order (which mean i get a CCJ), then this would be the enforcement of the order?

 

but i never got told i was being taken to court, other than default letters i guess, do they count? but no actual notification.

 

Plus no CCJ showed up on that trust site or any of the CRAs... Maybe it will have now though :( just as it was getting slightly better.

 

 

And i still dont get the letter i got 21/12/11 from legal recoveries & collections LTD which stated:

 

"As you are aware our client obtained Judgement against you on 21/12/11 and the current balance is £1,704.05... (if they obtained judgement that day, how could i be aware?)

 

...You need to contact us to set up and agree a mutually acceptable payment arrangement to discharge the security the client holds on your property, which will remain in place until such time as it has been paid in full."

 

Anyway thanks for your help guys. I dont really know what to do now. I will ring the court I guess and see what they say. I mean surely they at least have to put the correct amount. Especially when they sent it to my damn employer.

 

An order for £900 odd is one thing and my boss would understand what happened, but jesus dropping a bill for five and half grand on his desk doesnt make me look like i can be left in charge of a £100k a night casino ...

Edited by Andrew25
Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

*********************************************************

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

DO NOT USE ANY PDF EDITOR TO BLANK STUFF, THAT CAN BE REMOVED

*************************************************************

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites [http://docupub.com/pdfconvert/]

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew you need to get the paperwork re. the recent claim.

 

If i'm reading this thread correctly either you never had a CCJ before or it was so far back in the past it has dropped off the system.

 

Anyway you only got a CCJ in Dec, this AoE is in relation to that Judgement.

 

Regarding missed payments Dec, Jan & Feb, this is immaterial, think about it for a second. How can they take you to court for payments you have yet to miss.

 

The good news regarding this, is that with the CCJ being very recent and the claimant used the old address trick, you can have this Judgement set aside on mandatory grounds regardless of the merits of your case.

 

But you need to start moving quickly on this, the clock is ticking, the longer you take to apply to set-aside the less chance you have of being successful.

 

Regarding your Job, dont worry about this, I have experience in this area. If you get the set aside granted, you can show them Judgement and tell them it was one big mistake by the claimant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

def get a set aside moving

 

whats this £85 you keep stating

hope its not via a fee paying CMC?

 

get that sar off to welcome today.-URGENT

 

do it by recorded delivery

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks,

 

i just spoke to the court and the lady was quite helpful. she said i had to write into them stating i dispute it and the reasons etc. and that will buy me time.

 

What makes you say i got the CCJ in december though? the letter about the "obtaining judgement" was 2011 and im preety sure that was before i checked all CRAs and the trust site etc. which all came up with nothing.

 

which paperwork do i need to get? from the court? or do i just write them a letter (i can drop it in by hand today) stating basically everything said here ??

 

 

wow im so confused... thansk you so much for your time everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

well when i got the letter in dec 2011 i went on their website and did a income expenditure thing and offered them 85£ a month. Paid that up until the 1st of august. then we had to move out quickly, i had no money after deposit rent etc so i contacted them sayin i couldnt pay 1st september, i didnt know what my new living expenses would be but i would make token payments of £20 from 1st october until i sorted out my financial situation.

 

changed banks in dec, they said the would change over DD etc, but it was a SO and just got cancelled and I didnt notice (So much comes out of my bank each month)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew, just clarify to get it set aisde on Mandatory grounds you need to prove the Claimant was aware of your correct address.

 

Secondly, it's probably worth preparing a second line of defence that your dispute is with merit. It not unknown for the other side to argue the judgement shouldn't be set aside because you have no chance of success when the claim is refiled and the judge to side with them even though it should be set-aside on the mandatory grounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also, yes i have nver had a CCJ... and as far as Im aware I still dont (althought it is becoming obv i do)

 

and they never sent anything to my old address. i moved in aug and notified LRC of this when I told them i couldnt pay for a month.

 

nothing has come to my old housefrom welcome LRC or a court

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Exact words on letter are "as you are aware our client obtained Judgement against you on 21/12/2012 and the current balance is £1,704.05. Our client's records show the last payment on the account was £105.75 on 04/04/2011. Effective immediately - please stop all payments to Irwin Mitchell."

 

 

According your post, you got a Judgement on the 21/12/12

Link to post
Share on other sites

the letter is a notice of change of solicitor and tells me to stop paying Irvin and Mitchell and to instead pay LRC it says it is on behalf of welcome and LRCs solicitors Sharp young and Pearce..

 

09/01/12 i got a final demand from those solicitors, and 16th i got a letter from LRC sayin £85 a month was accepted

Link to post
Share on other sites

andy

 

get that SAR sent off

 

it will give you the back ground info for the seta side.

 

it can take 40days so the quicker the better.

 

go catch the lunchtime post

you can get the £10 PO at the post office desk at the same time you RD it

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok SAR done and a letter to the court (although it is a bit long)

 

will go get them in the post...

 

 

Thank you all so much for your advice!

 

 

once more thing, do i need to SAR the companies I was paying on behalf of WF somewhere along the line? as im not sure I have evidence of all the payments I made. There are also two payments on one statement I have from WF with £302 of court fees for each, dated 10th and 12th of decembber 2008?? So why wasnt I informed about that?

 

Its all getting very strange

Link to post
Share on other sites

all the payments should be ging to WF

so no need

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...