Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

andrew hart/paydayoverdraft claimform - Payday Loan Problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello!
 
 
I took out a loan with a payday loan company of 250. I rolled the loan several times. My financial situation had become very poor and I took some independent advice. I was recommended to Payplan, with whom I entered into a debt management plan. When this company received the details of the plan, he phoned me and said that if I did not pay him he would go to the police and report me for obtaining money by deception. I was extremely scared, so arranged with him to pay him 200 pcm (the balance of the loan was now over 750 due to 300 of admin costs). I made the payments each month until this month, when I explained that I could not pay, and came to an arrangement with him to pay 127, which would mean I had paid 527 to date, which is the outstanding amount of the loan plus interest, exclusive of costs.
 
 
Yesterday, I received a Claim Form for 2487. The Particulars of Claim are very strange: all different figures to the ones quoted, no reference to the payments that I have made to date, simply that I broke a repayment plan. Also, he accounts twice for admin costs (1k in aggregate) and twice for interest.
 
 
Obviously, I am going to contest this. 2487 on a 250 loan, of which 547 has already been paid is not fair.
 
 
Basically, I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations on how to deal with this, or how to deal with this company?
 
 
This is a big worry to me, but I feel that it must be pursued through the courts because this man is impossible to deal with. I also hate the thought of him doing this to someone else who is more vulnerable.
 
 
Any help you can provide is greatly appreciated.
 
 
Have a lovely day.
 
 
x
 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Approval Date Time 2011-xx-xx*

*Loan Amount (initially requested: 250) 250*

*Term (initially requested: 15 days) 30 Edit*

*Repayment Date: xx/xx/2011 auto calculated*

*Total to Repay 358.12*

*Made many promises to repay but failed a repayment plan*

*Non collection x 20 50*

*Default x 2 70*

*Admin 400 (capped)*

*Texts emails and tele 675*

*Interest to judgeement estimated – 829.48*

*Total outstandinging – 2407.60*

*The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xx to xx on 2,407.60 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of 4.66*

 

Dates removed

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Coledog.

 

There is no ref in the above to the 527 repayment i have made. Very strange. I have asked repeatedly for a breakdown of "admin costs" (i.e. what differentiates these charges from the charges for "texts emails tele" but haven't received any information. I have also asked for a schedule of dates, times and costs incurred under the "texts, emails, tele" bracket, but none has been received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi katysue

 

Firstly don't worry about any Court claim this person is threatening/trying to go ahead with

 

You've already shown to be more than willing to settle this matter so how can it be justified to put the matter before a Court, a Judge would not be best pleased to say the least

 

There are caggers who will help you format a good defence

 

This guy has just bullied you into making payments you couldn't afford and is now just being extra greedy

 

Good luck

 

R

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please let us know the date of issue of the claim form.. top right hand corner

 

You need to stick to a time table... which will be..

 

Date of issue + 5 for service + 14 to acknowledge + 14 to submit defence ( if that is your intention)

 

Your response to 42man's question.. Your document is a Fixed Sum Loan Agreement. In your first post you have confirmed that the original loan has been rolled over. Were you provided with new agreements each time it was rolled up ?

 

Were you sent a "Default Notice" which would be issued under the CCA1974 - Section 87(1) - This would advise that you have breached an agreement, and that you have a certain amount of time to remedy the breach (the repayment of arrears)

 

Were you sent a Formal demand

 

Were you sent a Letter before Action.

 

Sorry for the questions, just trying to discover if the company has followed court protocol :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. None of the above. I had a discussion with him via email at end of NOvember. I explained i could not meet the 200 payment, but could pay 127. He said this would be fine. I made the payment. Yesterday, the Claim Form showed up.

 

Citizen B - Don't worry. The CF is dated 8/12. It was received yesterday. By my calcs, that makes date of service Tuesday, and i filed AOS yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there is a court claim and the claim must be answered!

 

We need to get some CPR done.

 

Does it say anywhere in the T&Cs that he can add admin charges? Have a good trawl through.

 

He cannot report you to the police – he would have to allege fraud, and show criminality. This has a familiar modus operandi, but best not to alert the idiot concerned...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oddly, the FLA is not dated. Charges detail below:

 

OUR CHARGES FOR DEFAULTERS

£25.00 PER LETTER

£25.00 NON COLLECTION FEES (APPLIES FOR REPAYMENT PLAN)

£35.00 DEFAULT LETTER FEE (APPLIES FOR REPAYMENT PLAN)

£25.00 SET UP REPAYMENT PLAN

£400 COURT ADMIN FEES TO COVER ADMIN TO TAKE TO COURT AND A CHARGE OF £275.00 PLUS WARRANT FEE of £100.00 FOR EACH WARRANT

£190 COURT SECOND WARRANT AND EACH WARRANT FEE IS £100 WHICH WE WILL SUE FOR AFTER THE COURT JUDGEMENT.

£75.00 FOR ISSUING THE JUDGEMENT WHICH WE WILL SUE FOR AFTER JUDGEMENT.

£5.00 for each text reminder.

£25.00 for each ten texts/emails negotiation fees(ie if a negotiation is going ahead to resolve the matter and whether it is agreed or not the charge is £25.00 for each 10 texts)

A telephone call to resolve a dispute/work out a settlement is £25.00

A £5.00 charge for each text/email/telephone call for reminders for any debt outstanding or signing loan reminders for loan extension applicants.

Interest will accrue at 1.3% until the loan is repaid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any opinions on whether he could report me to the police for "obtaining money by deception"? Apparently i tiocked a box when i took out the loan saying i had no other loans.

 

If you completed the application honestly given your financial standing at the time and then things changed he would have a hard job proving "Deception" and besides the Police have more pressing things to do like polish thier truncheons (Showing my age there)

 

More threats and BS

 

R

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have already paid more than £500 on a £250 loan?

 

I have dug out the T&Cs – they would fail under CPUTR, and include clear unfair charges that do not relate to the actual costs involved.

 

There should be extra T&Cs and terms on the agreement itself – do you have a copy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've paid 527 on a 250 loan already, exclusive of the many rollover fees i paid.

 

I'm not trying to get out of what i owe him. I just dispute that that amount is 2.5k!

 

I have a copy of the agreement in PDF format. I also have some detail he provided on admin costs on email prior to the repayment plan being started back in September (this initial 230 figure appears to have risen to 675 in the Claim Form):

 

telephone, admin and texts emails (emails x 8/texts x 20/telephone calls x 9)=£230.00

 

 

each telephone call made is £5.00=£35.00

long discussion is £25.00 for conversations over 5 minutes

text are £5.00

emails are £5.00 for standard

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they permitted to charge for a Default Notice ? It is a statutory document !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get onto the police and ask for the Money Laundering team, this sort of loan sharking is big news at the moment.

 

Also get onto the OFT and Trading standards.

 

Those particulars are outrageous, I would CPR him and ask for

 

Itemised costs for the calls, itemised costs for each contact made, itemised bank statements of his company showing your repayments already made

 

Also ask for him in person to be present at court for questioning, this costs an additional £35 or so but it worth it, if they refuse to show up the court can automatically dismiss the case... especially if they are doing the claim on their own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Item no I in your defence is

 

"I have already repaid XXX which more than covers the original loan amount and one months interest. Given that the rest of the claim is unfair and unlawful and unproven charges this is a vexatious and litigatious case and therefore should be dismissed with no leave to appeal. There is no debt to repay."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice. Happy to attend court in person.

 

Will file defence on Saturday. Feel a bit stupid for giving him so much money already.

 

Hoepfully the judge will see how ridiculous it is, but being taken to court for 2.5k is very nervewracking!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...