Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RTA claim & solicitor problems


johnyretro
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4566 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am having problems with an RTA (road traffic accident) claim.

I suffered neck injury from an accident almost 3 years ago, a bus came across a give way sign and ploughed into the side of my car. I approached a local solicitor to ask about a claim as my insurance did not cover me for legal costs.

I did received a payment for the car damage but my injury claim is on going.

My solicitor did all the paperwork etc and last year the bus company offered me £2,500 for my injuries, my solicitor keeps pushing me to accept the offer and also seems worried about the case going to court , I was advised by a number of friends not to accept this as I am suffering long term neck pain, and also that when the solicitor advised me in writing to accept the offer he also stated that I would have no further claims after my acceptance.

I have been examined once by their doctor and she made an assessment of my injuries. and the claim is based on this assessment. My solicitor says that to increase the claim I have to get a prognoses from the doctor or consultant to state that the current prolonged injury was caused by the accident. But this is proving very difficult and I thought the solicitor should be doing this, i also thought that he would arrange for further treatment for me as I am struggling to receive the appropriate treatment via the NHS.

One of the problems is that I have also got underlying problems from an Injury I had 10 years ago which seems to complicate the issue.

I did have one or two flare ups before the accident but since the recent accident I have suffered neck and arm pain every night

I also have slight compression of one of the nerves which gives me pain down both arms.

I had a recent MRI scan and nerve conduction studies and the consultant says that the neck pain is cause by degenarative changes in my spine and when I asked if the accident had made it worse he refused to comment and just said "I am not getting involved in any accidents "

I have only months to go before my claim ends (apparently I have only 3 years to complete the claim) and my solicitor is pushing me to accept the offer.

My solicitor also says that there is outstanding debt for the car hire which I think the cost of this has been exaggerated somewhat but has been claimed from the bus company.

I feel i need to complain about the solicitor as I don't think he has done enough to help me..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to insurance forum

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, we really need to know how your claim is being funded. Is the solicitor working on a 'no win no fee' basis or through 'after the event' insurance, for example, or are you paying the costs?

 

Secondly, I think your expectations of what your solicitor should be doing are a little unrealistic - for example it is entirely up to you or your GP to organise treatment for your injuries whether that's privately or through the NHS, and if the cost of medical reports etc isn't covered by insurance then it would be unreasonable to expect the solicitor to pay for them though he should do the actual organising.

 

However, you do need to move on this quite swiftly. If legal proceedings have not been issued within 3 years from the date of the accident, that's the end of your claim, and your solicitor is quite right to warn you about this.

 

Tell us who is paying the solicitors costs and I'm sure you'll get some more help.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, we really need to know how your claim is being funded. Is the solicitor working on a 'no win no fee' basis or through 'after the event' insurance, for example, or are you paying the costs?

 

Secondly, I think your expectations of what your solicitor should be doing are a little unrealistic - for example it is entirely up to you or your GP to organise treatment for your injuries whether that's privately or through the NHS, and if the cost of medical reports etc isn't covered by insurance then it would be unreasonable to expect the solicitor to pay for them though he should do the actual organising.

 

However, you do need to move on this quite swiftly. If legal proceedings have not been issued within 3 years from the date of the accident, that's the end of your claim, and your solicitor is quite right to warn you about this.

 

Tell us who is paying the solicitors costs and I'm sure you'll get some more help.

 

 

 

I would tend to agree, it seems like the OP's expectations are unrealistic and to complain seems unfair.

 

You cannot have treatment if it is not supported by the medial evidence as ultimately the Defendant's insurers will not pay it and you would be liable for the costs so your solicitor may actually be acting in your best interests!

 

Assuming that the claim is funded by a CFA then the solicitor is taking the risk with the cost of the medical report. Each medical report costs around £400.00 (and that's only from a GP!) and I am guessing you are not privately funding this?

 

It may help if you told us the prognosis the medical expert gave. It sounds like it was a exacerbation of a pre existing condition that I would guess was under 1 year?

 

At the end of the day your friends are not privy to your full file and are not legally qualified and so I would be very wary of listening to them over your solicitor.

 

The problem you have is that if you do not accept the offer and the Court award a lower amount you will may to pay the Defendant's costs. Its all about risk. If you do not commence Court action within 3 years of the date of the accident then you will be barred from doing so you need to make up you mind quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Ganymede.

 

Basically I assume that you have a medical report from a GP or orthopaedic consultant that says that you have problems with your neck that was either present before the accident or that the accident has caused the symptoms to be present now, but that they would have been present in a years time, irrespective of the accident happening or not.

 

This is why your solicitor is telling you to settle.

 

In order for you to try and get any more dosh, you will need to obtain and serve medical evidence that supports your claim that the ongoing medical problems are related to the RTA and not your pre-existing condition. Very difficult to do and the Court will probably not allow you to get/rely upon further medical evidence and in any event, the Defendants will just rely upon your original medical report that you served on them.

 

If you ignore your solicitors advice, you are running a very real risk that you will end up paying some, if not all, of the Defendant's costs if you go to Court and do not get more than what they offered you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Ganymede.

 

Basically I assume that you have a medical report from a GP or orthopaedic consultant that says that you have problems with your neck that was either present before the accident or that the accident has caused the symptoms to be present now, but that they would have been present in a years time, irrespective of the accident happening or not.

 

This is why your solicitor is telling you to settle.

 

In order for you to try and get any more dosh, you will need to obtain and serve medical evidence that supports your claim that the ongoing medical problems are related to the RTA and not your pre-existing condition. Very difficult to do and the Court will probably not allow you to get/rely upon further medical evidence and in any event, the Defendants will just rely upon your original medical report that you served on them.

 

If you ignore your solicitors advice, you are running a very real risk that you will end up paying some, if not all, of the Defendant's costs if you go to Court and do not get more than what they offered you.

 

 

Yup, the pre existing degenerative chances make it very unlikely that any other medical expert will give a different prognosis.

 

The OP wants the medical expert to say all her current symptoms are as a direct result of the accident when unfortunately that simply isn't the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, we really need to know how your claim is being funded. Is the solicitor working on a 'no win no fee' basis or through 'after the event' insurance, for example, or are you paying the costs?

 

Secondly, I think your expectations of what your solicitor should be doing are a little unrealistic - for example it is entirely up to you or your GP to organise treatment for your injuries whether that's privately or through the NHS, and if the cost of medical reports etc isn't covered by insurance then it would be unreasonable to expect the solicitor to pay for them though he should do the actual organising.

 

However, you do need to move on this quite swiftly. If legal proceedings have not been issued within 3 years from the date of the accident, that's the end of your claim, and your solicitor is quite right to warn you about this.

 

Tell us who is paying the solicitors costs and I'm sure you'll get some more help.

 

 

Hi thanks for your response.

my claim is being funded on a no win no fee basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitors medical expert said I was suffering from whiplash injuries and that I had previous problems from an older injury wish has been exacerbated by the more recent accident, her prognoses was that I should be able to return to the previous state before the accident within 12 months, the original neck problem occurred in the year 2000 with occasional flare ups one of which was a few months before the accident, but the 'flare-ups' normally only last for a short time, and I have been suffering intense pain everyday since the accident. the claim handler also wants me to accept and sign for the first offer the 3rd party has made and also that I will have no further claims after this acceptance!

 

 

I would tend to agree, it seems like the OP's expectations are unrealistic and to complain seems unfair.

 

You cannot have treatment if it is not supported by the medial evidence as ultimately the Defendant's insurers will not pay it and you would be liable for the costs so your solicitor may actually be acting in your best interests!

 

Assuming that the claim is funded by a CFA then the solicitor is taking the risk with the cost of the medical report. Each medical report costs around £400.00 (and that's only from a GP!) and I am guessing you are not privately funding this?

 

It may help if you told us the prognosis the medical expert gave. It sounds like it was a exacerbation of a pre existing condition that I would guess was under 1 year?

 

At the end of the day your friends are not privy to your full file and are not legally qualified and so I would be very wary of listening to them over your solicitor.

 

The problem you have is that if you do not accept the offer and the Court award a lower amount you will may to pay the Defendant's costs. Its all about risk. If you do not commence Court action within 3 years of the date of the accident then you will be barred from doing so you need to make up you mind quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well obviously if you accept an offer and settle you won't be able to go back for further compensation as you could just going back for more!

 

£2500 doesn't seem unreasonable for a 12 month prognosis but we're not privy to the information your solicitor has. If the £2500 if what the solicitor expected and valued you claim at you will need to accept it soon otherwise your 3 years will expire and you won't get a penny!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It all depends on the evidence on your file and key to this is your medical report. Your doctor seems to be of the view that your pre-existing neck problems were exacerbated by the more recent accident and is also clear about the prognosis. It would be difficult for you to challenge this opinion without further medical evidence. Besides, the bus company has already seen your medical report and the offer has been pitched at £2500 based on this evidence. Did your solicitor obtain all your medical records from your GP and or hospital? It's worthwhile getting your medical records to assess the extent of your pre-existing condition.

 

If you accept the bus company's offer, the settlement will be final. You need to issue court proceedings before the three years run out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...