Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case  when he penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi. Today we finally got a response from Vanquis, who we CCA'd at the start of June. They have already comitted an offense.

 

What we recieved is two photocopied sheets of paper, one is A4 sized and the other is a lot smaller. Theres nothing to link the two together and they cant be two sides of one document.

 

The part with the signature on it looks like a mailer, and the only things on that page are 'Your right to cancel' and some contact phone numbers.

 

On the other A4 sized sheet there is Key Financial Information, Other Financial Information, Key Information and Missing Payments details. Then underneath there's Your Declaration (with no signature) and at the bottom there is our pre-typed address next to a note saying Please reply by 11th July 2005. Also hand written date of birth, previous address and annual salary.

 

I dont know how to check if the interest/APR adds up though.

 

We also got a prinout of the long terms and conditions, which are reffered to underneath the signature. These are not the T&C's at the time we took the card though, as the late payments fees etc are £12, and on the 'agreement' it says they are £20.

 

Does anyone have any idea where we stand with Vanquis now, as they DID default and offend.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monopoly...how old is this?

 

statements like "key financial information" etc didnt come in until 2005(ish)

 

if the debt is older than a couple of years they have not complied with your request....go get them

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone,

 

i have just recieved this mbna cca via lowell financial.only one page recieved and this was scanned so it is a good copy.as can be seen it is mostly illegible with the exception of my name and credit limit which is crystal clear !.strange the credit limit is 2k yet i believe the apr rates refer to 1k 3k etc.

could you give me some idea on a professional response to lowell.it has also arrived beyond the 12 + 2 days but within the 12+2+30.

 

thanks

 

http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x175/janequeenie/lowell.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

wake up tomoz with a clear head may its past midnight lol

 

I wish:) had some homework to do on this one!

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monopoly...how old is this?

 

statements like "key financial information" etc didnt come in until 2005(ish)

 

if the debt is older than a couple of years they have not complied with your request....go get them

 

Dave

 

Hi. The smaller of the photocopies, which looks like a mailer/application is dated 22/06/05.

Ive also noticed on bills, that we're paying into a repayment option plan, and there is no mention of this or any kind of PPI in what they sent us. It is mentioned in the t&c's but only to explian under what circumstances it will come into effect.

Also, they have sent us their current t&c's, not the ones used at the time the account opened.

 

What I'd like to do is get all PPI payments back, plus charges because Im rubbish at trying to tell whether these 'agreements' are legit or not!

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also have thought that it would be time limited

 

if they have had no contact since 1993 then I would have thought that the statute of limitations would apply? they have 6 years to chase a debt. unless it has been the subject of a ccj

 

rgds

 

Dave

hI Dave

 

JUst to clarify the SL would apply even if the debt was subject to a CCJ

Section 24 stat of limitaions 1980.

 

Best regards

Petr

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just had a telephone conversation with someone at Lowell's who informed me that they neither have a copy of my Signed Credit Agreement nor do they need one. I was also told that to get one (From Capital One) would take 90 days. Is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Today we finally got a response from Vanquis, who we CCA'd at the start of June. They have already comitted an offense.

 

What we recieved is two photocopied sheets of paper, one is A4 sized and the other is a lot smaller. Theres nothing to link the two together and they cant be two sides of one document.

 

The part with the signature on it looks like a mailer, and the only things on that page are 'Your right to cancel' and some contact phone numbers.

 

On the other A4 sized sheet there is Key Financial Information, Other Financial Information, Key Information and Missing Payments details. Then underneath there's Your Declaration (with no signature) and at the bottom there is our pre-typed address next to a note saying Please reply by 11th July 2005. Also hand written date of birth, previous address and annual salary.

 

I dont know how to check if the interest/APR adds up though.

 

We also got a prinout of the long terms and conditions, which are reffered to underneath the signature. These are not the T&C's at the time we took the card though, as the late payments fees etc are £12, and on the 'agreement' it says they are £20.

 

Does anyone have any idea where we stand with Vanquis now, as they DID default and offend.

 

HI

 

When you ask for a copy of your agreement it should include within the body of the document the tems and condiotions laid out in the regulations as per section 2.

I would therefore totally disregard any information headed Tand cs as being an additional information sheet.

A copy of a signature document and a set of Tand cs is simply not enough to satisfy the requirements ofa true copy no matter what the creditors say.

As has been illustrated her many times there is nothing to link the documents even if they were made at the same time.

If the prescribed terms are not part of the signature document (not nesseserally the same page) then they are not in the agreement and it is unenforceable.

As i have said before there is no mention of the term "terms and conditons" in the regulations either as a heading or anything else nor shouold ther be it is not a legal document it is an information sheet it has not been executed and connot be used as part of the agreement.

 

Regards

Peter

  • Haha 1

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just had a telephone conversation with someone at Lowell's who informed me that they neither have a copy of my Signed Credit Agreement nor do they need one. I was also told that to get one (From Capital One) would take 90 days. Is this correct?

 

Hi

When Lowell took on the account they took on all the responsibilities as creditor see definitions cca1974.

This means they must comply with the request as if they were the creditor and suply the information within the required time frame or be in default.

 

Regards

peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I should write back saying that what they've sent does not satisfy my request and the account is still in dispute? Are there any other points I should mention apart from

1) The documents they have sent are not linked in any way, and the signature doc is a totally different size than the doc with the financial info on,

2) The t&c's reffered to in the doc are earlier ones to what they sent and are to be disregarded,

3)There are no prescribed terms within the signature doc

4)They are way over the lime limit for providing this info and cant enforce it without a court order anyway?

 

Thanks a lot peter, you're an absolute star! ;)

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

YOu could quote

Form and content of regulated consumer credit agreements

2.-{1) Subject to paragraph (2) below, documents embodying regulated

consumer credit agreements (other than modifying agreements) shall contain the information set out in Column 2 of Schedule 1to these Regulations in so far as it relates to the type of agreement referred to in Column 1.

And say that the t and cs you sent were not conntained within the agreement but were sepperate to and therere the copy you sent did not contain the prescribed terms. It might be woth mentioning, that it should be noted that the t and cs you sent were not even concurrent with the execution of the agreement.

 

Regards

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

When Lowell took on the account they took on all the responsibilities as creditor see definitions cca1974.

This means they must comply with the request as if they were the creditor and suply the information within the required time frame or be in default.

 

Regards

peter

 

RCJ this is what I sent to one of my DCAs, H Cohen & Co, when I got that same response as you (courtesy of Rory) :-

 

May I draw your attention to the XXXX paragraph of your letter wherein you state:-

 

“Please be advised that we Howard Cohen & Co are not obliged to furnish you with documentation under a request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, any such request should have been directed to our client, CL Finance Limited”.

 

May I now respectfully draw your attention to the following:-

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974

s.175

Where under this Act a person is deemed to receive a notice or payment as agent of the creditor or owner under the regulated agreement, he shall be deemed to be under a contractual duty to the creditor or owner to transmit the notice, or remit the payment, to him forthwith.

 

You are therefore obliged to pass on my request to your client.

 

 

Love Spiritgirl x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RCJ this is what I sent to one of my DCAs, H Cohen & Co, when I got that same response as you (courtesy of Rory) :-

 

 

 

Love Spiritgirl x

Hi

 

Yes alolutely if Lowells are acting as an agent for the creditor but if they have bought the account then they become the creditor.

"

“creditor” means the person providing credit under a consumer credit agreement or the person to whom his rights and duties under the agreement have passed by assignment or operation of law, and in relation to a prospective consumer credit agreement, includes the prospective creditor;"

section 189 cca

Regards

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Peter :)

 

LOL these DCAs will try anything to wriggle out of their responsibilities...obviously hoping we will never remind them of them:rolleyes:

...and if Capital One are involved as the OC, the chances of you getting a copy of a properly executed agreement anyway is nil IMHO. I've yet to see anyone on here (myself included) get anything other than photocopied application forms from Capital One RCJ!

 

Good luck, will keep watching!

Love Spiritgirl x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi pb spiritgirl,

 

could you give me assistance on the below as little new to this and i think trying to act on all my dca at once is causing confusion.

 

i have just recieved this mbna cca via lowell financial.only one page recieved and this was scanned so it is a good copy.as can be seen it is mostly illegible with the exception of my name and credit limit which is crystal clear !.strange the credit limit is 2k yet i believe the apr rates refer to 1k 3k etc.

could you give me some idea on a professional response to lowell.it has also arrived beyond the 12 + 2 days but within the 12+2+30.

 

thanks

 

http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x175/janequeenie/lowell.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As far as i can see they have not sent all the information they should have( full copy of T+cs cancellation details ,signed statement of account etc.) so they are still in default

I would challenge them on this first

 

Then i would challenge them on the agreement itself and the fact that it does not conform to regulation of form and content as required under section 60 of the act.

All the prescribed terms seem to be there so you would not be able to say tht this was unenforceable however there a large number of discrepancies that could be listed and used to make them have to go to court to get permission to enforce.

 

Regards

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Peter says, a copy of a sig document/ application form/mailer and copy of the T&Cs, does not a true copy of a properly executed agreement make.

 

Peter has written confirmation of this from the Secretary of State himself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Peter :)

 

LOL these DCAs will try anything to wriggle out of their responsibilities...obviously hoping we will never remind them of them:rolleyes:

...and if Capital One are involved as the OC, the chances of you getting a copy of a properly executed agreement anyway is nil IMHO. I've yet to see anyone on here (myself included) get anything other than photocopied application forms from Capital One RCJ!

 

Good luck, will keep watching!

Love Spiritgirl x

 

Yes i am waiting for one myself from Cap 1. I have just sent the letter threatening them with action to recover all charges on the account,usually stirrs em up.

 

Regards

peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Peter,

 

if they were going to rely on this as the agreement shouldnt it also be signed by them which this isnt unlike others i have recieved off mbna with the stamped signature .

also i find it hard to believe that they would already have given a credit limit of 2k on an application form, if this isnt the case surely thay are not allowed to tamper with the agreement by adding things on that werent their originally.

 

j

Link to post
Share on other sites

**thinks** BCard have sent me two versions of their T&Cs.

 

Neither of them are the same. One is dated as as 7/99 and the other 8/99.

 

Both came with a letter saying

 

1) herewith are enclosed copy of your executed agreement in the prescribed format. (unsigned photocopy of the T&Cs)

 

2)A copy of your Barclaycard signed Credit Agreement regulated by the CCA 1974, which you signed in agreement that you were legally bound by the Barclaycard Terms and conditions. (my application form/mailshot- no prescribed terms)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...