Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4970 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you all for the replies, I shall defend the claim as planned.

CL Finance now have the debt as it was assigned and it is they who are taking me to court,is it worth me reminding them that I'm still awaiting a true copy of the final document?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

is it worth me reminding them that I'm still awaiting a true copy of the final document?

There is no harm in it.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks,

 

is there a limit to the number of SAR's you can make to one company in a given time period?

 

I put 1 in January, now taking legal action and the company just state in their defence they supplied the data last year?

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks,

 

is there a limit to the number of S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'s you can make to one company in a given time period?

 

I put 1 in January, now taking legal action and the company just state in their defence they supplied the data last year?

 

Nope, as far as I am aware you can do as many as you like. Although, you could argue that if say you claosed an account and then had no contact with the company and did a sar that there would be little point doing another one.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I got a CCA agreement from Lloyds the other day, and these are the results from the checker site.

 

Can anyone tell me whether it's enforceable from the amounts shown?

 

The bits that are blank or have zeros in are because it tells you not to enter anything if the exact wording isnt shown.

Thanks

 

Im putting up the agreement from Lloyds that these checker results are from. It is written word for word, typos and all. Ive left out the last two pages and just done a summary.

The checker shows it to be unenforceable but what do you all think?

Big loan CCA.doc

Agreement assesment.doc

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im putting up the agreement from Lloyds that these checker results are from. It is written word for word, typos and all. Ive left out the last two pages and just done a summary.

The checker shows it to be unenforceable but what do you all think?

 

Checker site?

 

Can I have a link please??

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

It does say agreement doesn't it.

And even if it didn't i would say thank your for your agreement knowing the court would throw it out. If you sign a form and it says this is an agreement then that is what it is ,it may not be properly executed it may not even be covered by the cca but that is for us to show and the more sloppy they are in handing out these mikey mouse copy agreement the easier it is for us to show they are unenforceable.

So as far as i am concerned if they send me cow back and say it is a copy of my agreement as requested i wil say thank you for the agreement and see you in court.

A common missconception is that they have to send a correctly executed copy of the agrreement on a section 77- request . They don't they just have to send a true copy of the executed agreement you signed it is up to you to decide whther it is correctly executed if they have sent a copy of the document you have signed they have fulfilled their request.

 

Also let us not forget that an agrement can be used to apply for a loan it happens when you sign the agreement and the creditor signs it later if he doesn't approve he doesn't signgn no ageement ,no signature,aplication refused.

 

Another thing the term application for crdit means to apply for credit.

You are not asking for a quotation which you could under the CCA.

Granted you should know that you are signing a binding agreement and the agreement should adhere to all the reqired form and terms but you are still asking for credit if not what?

 

Best regards

Peter

 

Peter

 

Bet regards

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peter. If that's a response to my question, I really don't have a clue what you're saying about it (dense day today) :confused:

If they have to send a true copy of the document I signed, then this isn't it, is it?

 

PS. I dont mean to sound rude or anything like that, it's just that I really dont get it!

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peter. If that's a response to my question, I really don't have a clue what you're saying about it (dense day today) :confused:

If they have to send a true copy of the document I signed, then this isn't it, is it?

 

PS. I dont mean to sound rude or anything like that, it's just that I really dont get it!

 

Monopoly, did they send you a document with your signature on it - whether it was an application form, or an unenforcable agreement or not?

 

If they did then they have satisified their obligations under sec 78 and you should accept it. You can then take them to court to get it ruled unenforcable.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im putting up the agreement from Lloyds that these checker results are from. It is written word for word, typos and all. Ive left out the last two pages and just done a summary.

The checker shows it to be unenforceable but what do you all think?

HI

 

The APR is 7.78%

The TAP seems to be incorrect in the assessment it should be £2,549.49

Thus the total charge for credit should be 2549.16- 1825.16 =£724.33

The total interest would be the same as the tcc as there are no set up fees etc

Why has it changed your payments form 49.99to49.98?

This is why it is coming out wrong and unenforceable. if the data you entered is correct it isn't not onthe maths anyway.

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peter. If that's a response to my question, I really don't have a clue what you're saying about it (dense day today) :confused:

If they have to send a true copy of the document I signed, then this isn't it, is it?

 

PS. I dont mean to sound rude or anything like that, it's just that I really dont get it!

Sory no it was a response to rory my fault forgot the quote button.

your responxe is the next posting.

As regrds

the previous response i was just reiterating that an executed agreement meely has to have both signatures and if that is what you signed and that is what they sent thent hey have complied.

It does not have to be an properly executed agreement.

 

Petr

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uniboy-no they did not send me anything with my signature on or even a ticked box from internet application.

 

Peter - it comes out as £49.98 instead of £49.99 because of the 0.1% interest difference that I pointed out before. But you said that was allowed anyway. 51 monthly payments at 1p less = 51p difference.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If an agreement is to be terminated by the creditor then i assume the default notice must contain reference to this as per section 87(a)

 

87.

Need for default notice.

— (1) Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice ”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

(a)

to terminate the agreement, or

 

(b)

to demand earlier payment of any sum, or

 

©

to recover possession of any goods or land, or

 

(d)

to treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred, or

 

(e)

to enforce any security.

 

 

(2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the creditor from treating the right to draw upon any credit as restricted or deferred, and taking such steps as may be necessary to make the restriction or deferment effective.

 

(3) The doing of an act by which a floating charge becomes fixed is not enforcement of a security.

 

(4) Regulations may provide that subsection (1) is not to apply to agreements described by the regulations.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, as far as I am aware you can do as many as you like. Although, you could argue that if say you claosed an account and then had no contact with the company and did a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) that there would be little point doing another one.

I believe that if you have an account open, the data controller can refuse to supply data if it has already received a request within a month previous.

As Un1 states, if the account is closed, and no financial changes, balance outstanding etc - they are not obliged to provided another.

 

If, for example (which is I think where you're going) you are trying to receive pre-6 year info, then send one, but ensure that you make it clear thats what you're after. Also, quote that the limitations act does not apply to personal data, and if they state they don'y have any further - ask for the method, date, time, method of disposal and by which staff member the data was destroyed. See what you get back.

JMO

  • Haha 1

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uniboy-no they did not send me anything with my signature on or even a ticked box from internet application.

 

Peter - it comes out as £49.98 instead of £49.99 because of the 0.1% interest difference that I pointed out before. But you said that was allowed anyway. 51 monthly payments at 1p less = 51p difference.

Hi

 

That is in the APR not the repaymtents how much did you pay 49.99 or 49.98 thatis the staring point together with the amount of credit if you entered 49.99 it should have worked out the APR ont hat figure not the other way around. 51p is enough to alter the figures on the TCC for which i don't think there is any tollerence and interest (Not APR)

 

Regads

Peer

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they state they don'y have any further - ask for the method, date, time, method of disposal and by which staff member the data was destroyed. See what you get back.

JMO

 

Hi,

 

Do they have to supply that information?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peter. We have been paying £49.99 which is 0.1% over what we should have been paying according to the checker.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Do they have to supply that information?

To ensure that the Data Controller (DC) is securely maintaining your data (including any that is allegedly no longer available) you have a right under DPA to ask how it is being disposed of. I remember someone quoting a letter from the ICO (I will trawl my saved quotes to see who it was), stating that if the data is being disposed of (from any media type) the subject has a right to know in what manner the disposal is carried out, ensuring the utmost security of any information that may be retrievable.

As the DC has overall responsibility, he/she should provide info on how, when, why, by whom, and allegedly a certificate showing how the disposal was carried ou (schredding, magnetic destruction, file deletion, burn etc) it's part of his specific responsibilities.

 

HTH

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To ensure that the Data Controller (DC) is securely maintaining your data (including any that is allegedly no longer available) you have a right under Data Protection Act to ask how it is being disposed of. I remember someone quoting a letter from the Information Commissioners Office (I will trawl my saved quotes to see who it was), stating that if the data is being disposed of (from any media type) the subject has a right to know in what manner the disposal is carried out, ensuring the utmost security of any information that may be retrievable.

As the DC has overall responsibility, he/she should provide info on how, when, why, by whom, and allegedly a certificate showing how the disposal was carried ou (schredding, magnetic destruction, file deletion, burn etc) it's part of his specific responsibilities.

 

HTH

 

Nice one, thanks!! :)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monopoly, did they send you a document with your signature on it - whether it was an application form, or an unenforcable agreement or not?

 

If they did then they have satisified their obligations under sec 78 and you should accept it. You can then take them to court to get it ruled unenforcable.

 

I wouldn't take them to court, just write to them and say you won't be paying. It's up to them to show the court it is enforceable, not the debtor to instigate the action to show it isn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't take them to court, just write to them and say you won't be paying. It's up to them to show the court it is enforceable, not the debtor to instigate the action to show it isn't.

 

Fair enough. I am having to take mine to court though because they are still processing a default- I haven't paid them since August 2006 and they haven't asked me for payment either. Granted, they haven't told me it's unenforcable either.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4970 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...