Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My bank are in criminal default of my CCA request because they haven't supplied the terms and conditons etc and have written to me saying that I am still liabole for the debt and they will write to me seperately to explain.

 

Any ideas ?

 

They are right Un1 the debt still remains, only problem is they cant enforce it without a court order and to get that they need the agreement.

 

I'd write back (when you get their fairy story explanation) telling them you will be happy to pay the debt when a Judge tells you to and not before. Might be an idea to ask why they can't just supply the documents instead of you having to collect them from the court during the hearing :D

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have found the template lette for ERC charges but is there anything that wold cover unlawful MIG (or just stating insurance and can be adjusted)?

 

MIG is a tricky one IMHO Maybelline, as you know I am arguing this on my ex wifes behalf with her mortgage company. It looks like they charged her about £1400 for it and then paid the broker £850 of it in commission just for the MIG portion. He got commission for the mortgage itself (about £300) and for the life insurance (about 600).

 

I'll post more on this as it develops.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just subscribing to this thread - it's taken me two days to read through half of it at the moment. Just a quick question to the Terminator - how did MBNA resolve your S85 default? I haven't got to that bit yet?

 

 

telling the final twist in the story before you read the whole book is banned :D

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks tamadus, I am challenging MIG because it was a secured loan (approx 5k) against a property with a very small mortgage and high equity, so dont think it should apply at all (?) posted earlier on this thread re this problem, so no broker involved because the lender just whacked it on the agreement on top of arrangement fees.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

MIG usually applies if your borrowing more than the loan to valuation percentage.

 

If the property had more equity than you borrowed then it shouldnt have been applied.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Oh boy, has this been an interesting exercise.

 

I did a spreadsheet out of curiosity regarding Section 85, working out the interest from November 2003 and it has come to a whalloping £2,385.95. Now if I add the contracual interest rate 24.90% to that it comes to £3,509.93. Wonder how I would word an N1 for that claim?

 

I am enjoying this more and more. i have to do the Crap One cards tomorrow.

 

I hope two banks choked on their morning coffee when they got my letters this morning serving the Section 85's on them.. now the clock has started ticking...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Battleaxe - have a look for a thread with Melaniebree - I am sure she recently did a claim with something like this (sorry if I am mistaken - I read so much on here) I am sure Melanie used something different than an N1 to do this stuff with as she wanted a default removing too I am sure. - she may have had the CCA/SAR stuff in with it - which was why she did it the other way - she was "happily" settled out of court I am sure.

 

Like you say it soon adds up?? Sure would start some tickers going wouldn't it? Blimey they'd soon need something in their coffee!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you work out how much interest to calim back for a sec 85 request? By looking on the statements?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh boy, has this been an interesting exercise.

 

I did a spreadsheet out of curiosity regarding Section 85, working out the interest from November 2003 and it has come to a whalloping £2,385.95. Now if I add the contracual interest rate 24.90% to that it comes to £3,509.93. Wonder how I would word an N1 for that claim?

 

I am enjoying this more and more. i have to do the Crap One cards tomorrow.

 

I hope two banks choked on their morning coffee when they got my letters this morning serving the Section 85's on them.. now the clock has started ticking...

 

Battleaxe - Ive just read your signature. In it (at the bottom) you state that you have CCA req two on 6/1/07. And that you have sent compaints to the OFT.

Errrr, the lender has 2 + 12 working days and then 1 calendar month to respond before you can do that - ot at least thats how I read it?!?!?!

 

Are you sure you have that right?

 

Please explain if Im wrong!

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Fully skinted, they are out of time 12+ 2+30 is correct. So I got in my OFT complaints when they after they got smart and sent me back T & C and a purported credit agreement for ME to sign and return to them Typical stalling tacts and feigning to misundertand my request. Decided to put a fire under them and yesterday I get a letter being threatened with Reliable Collections, so sent a missle back thanking them for affording me the oppoertunity to claim further compensation by their intransigent attitude. I also asked them to refer to thei legal department if they failed to understand the content of my letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

UnIboy,

 

The interest is listed on every statement with the date this interest was applied, so it was easy to follow and work out. i used one of Vampiresses spreadsheets (No 2) and for the heck of it used the contractual interest for this exercise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Tried to search and that is turned off, so decided to change my avatar, that facility is turned off, so I am off to the hairdressers for pick me up, hopefully when I come back things will be turned on again. I did make a donation this week, honest guys...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Fully skinted, I sent the original CCA request off 3 December, they took a month to reply so I sent them a reminder on the 6 January 2007 after they sent back a credit agreement for me to sign. This was the basis of my complaint to the OFT, that they are stalling. There isn't a credit agreement in existence for either of the accounts, this why they cannot provide them. Maybe I should have made my sig more clear; we are only allowed so many characters so I was trying to be concise. So whatever way you work it, the cunning little devils are out of time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh. I see :)

 

One of mine wrote back pretty quick saying no CCA in their archives. Im giving them the full +30 calendar month now to see if they change their mind...

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator

Now Mbusa have threatened to default me on the 31st January which happens to be the day they commit a criminal offence.You may call this cagey but they are going to get hit with an LBA on exactly the same day as they issue a default so they won't only choke on their coffee next Thursday morning but throw up as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Mbusa legal eagle (Bill Wareing) and I had a discussion this afternoon. they got my Section 85 default yesterday, he said I couldn't default them, so I just said watch me. We have reached a settlement on the non-compliance and I am £200.00 richer,plus court costs, told him I would notify the court once I had the cheque safely honoured in my bank account. We discussed the charges still to be filed, they don't want the agony of the Court room, so have to ring him next Thursday to see what they are offering.

he is very uncomfortable about the Section 85, he did ask how much was it going to cost them, so when I told him the figure, and the compund contractual interest. I think they are going to have some uncomfortable discussions in the ensuing weeks, seeing they have been in breach since November 2003. He also asked how I found out about Section 85 and I told him that I have a copy of the Consumer Credit Act and have plenty of time to read then spoke to some very wise men. I am going to get a pimple on my tongue for that fib.

 

I also reminded him about the Credit Agreement request that they in defualt of now and he said he is not sure they can find a properly executed one, so I just teased him and reminded him what a fine mess A & L have landed them with. Tam, this is so enjoyable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now Mbusa have threatened to default me on the 31st January which happens to be the day they commit a criminal offence.You may call this cagey but they are going to get hit with an LBA on exactly the same day as they issue a default so they won't only choke on their coffee next Thursday morning but throw up as well

 

 

Mr T - they cant issue a default in the + 30 days. As of the 12th day the account is HELD with no interest to be added, no adverse credit references/marks and no defaults or DCAs involved.

 

WTF are they playing at?

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Terminator -

Just getting around to raising S85 against Amex.

 

'To correct this, consolidation must be made within 1 month of this notice.

 

If the correction required by this notice is taken before the date of expiry of this notice then no further action will be taken in respect of the breach.

 

If the action required by this notice is not taken within 1 month of this notice then the default will be registered with a credit reference agency.'

 

Question: what does Consolidation do? ie to me it sounds like you have to add up values into one value.

Question: What do you register with the two credit reference agencies? that they in Default on your account under S85? Isnt this likely to give YOU adverse credit IF finance companies start looking for folk like us?

 

thanks

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we clarify here -this thread is so huge it's getting a tad difficult to decipher! Is it established (re: S85) that a credit card is in fact a Credit Token? Is it also established that a new agreement should be sent out with every re-issued Credit Card? And is it established that if a new agreement is NOT in existence then the CC isuer is in default? If all the answers are yes, then this is SUCH a goody!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...